tx-p42G10 v 40W5500 v LE- 40B650 v other
Discussion
I'm looking for a 40-42" TV to buy in the next couple weeks, budget approx £750 give or take a bit.
Considering:
Panasonic TX-P42G10
Sony 40W5500
Samsung LE-40B650
Mostly it'd be used for watching SD TV and Dvds however I'd like it to be futureproof so both good SD and HD performance is a must.
I have a lot of films on avi/divx/mp4 form on my computer so being able to play these on the TV, either by USB or network is a major plus point.
A wide viewing angle would be useful as the room it'll be in is relatively long and thin.
Does anyone have any opinions as to which suits my requirements better? Or any other TVs which would be more suitable?
Many thanks!
Considering:
Panasonic TX-P42G10
Sony 40W5500
Samsung LE-40B650
Mostly it'd be used for watching SD TV and Dvds however I'd like it to be futureproof so both good SD and HD performance is a must.
I have a lot of films on avi/divx/mp4 form on my computer so being able to play these on the TV, either by USB or network is a major plus point.
A wide viewing angle would be useful as the room it'll be in is relatively long and thin.
Does anyone have any opinions as to which suits my requirements better? Or any other TVs which would be more suitable?
Many thanks!
I'd have the Sony. Too many people I know with Samsungs have spent their days watching telly wishing they'd spent the extra on a Bravia, and I personally have had too many issues with Panasonic kit to recommend it to anyone sadly.
I'd be tempted to look at some of the LG panels as well, as I've been hearing nothing but good things about them from friends and reviews. Oh yeah and I've got one and it's fairly uber. Really annoying motion blur on Sky Sports, but apart from that it's been spot on (out of interest will the motion blur go away if I upgrade to Sky HD?).
I'd be tempted to look at some of the LG panels as well, as I've been hearing nothing but good things about them from friends and reviews. Oh yeah and I've got one and it's fairly uber. Really annoying motion blur on Sky Sports, but apart from that it's been spot on (out of interest will the motion blur go away if I upgrade to Sky HD?).
bodhi said:
E31Shrew said:
Plotloss said:
bodhi said:
Too many people I know with Samsungs have spent their days watching telly wishing they'd spent the extra
But the Sony's the better of the 2 LCD sets but the G10 kills both of them easily
You could consider JVC's LT-42DV1.
A wee salvo of short, sharp claps and it switches off. Repeat to reverse.
Brilliant, yes but it also has one overriding, thoroughly redeeming characteristic for a larger LCD - it's actually bloody good - not ok but better than it has any right to be good.
A wee salvo of short, sharp claps and it switches off. Repeat to reverse.
Brilliant, yes but it also has one overriding, thoroughly redeeming characteristic for a larger LCD - it's actually bloody good - not ok but better than it has any right to be good.
Thanks for all the advice!
I'm still agonising over this one - unsuprising given the figures involved!
Elsewhere people have said that given I'm going to be sitting 2.5m from the TV I shouldn't look at anything less than 50" if I'm going to notice the benefits of HD.
Equally lots of people have said that the SD performance of large screens is really quite poor.
At first I expect the TV will be used mainly for SD with the occasional HD (from blu-ray/possibly freesat), as I can't yet afford Sky and my area isn't cabled.
But on the other hand I don't intend to replace the TV for 3 or 4 years - I'm paying for it with money from my 21st birthday and a sign-on bonus from starting work - neither of which will be seen again, so I'm unlikely to be able to afford to change it until I'm qualified (3 yrs) and recieve the resulting pay rise! But in te next 3-4 years I expect HD broadcasting will become normal - by that time analogue will have gone. So I don't want to sacrifice HD performance too much.
I'm prepared to push the budget to the £1000 mark for the right TV - but any thoughts on how to weigh up the big size for HD vs avoid big and full HD ready TV for SD watching?
Is the only option to go to an independent store and get them to show me TVs when they've been set up right?
Thanks again!
I'm still agonising over this one - unsuprising given the figures involved!
Elsewhere people have said that given I'm going to be sitting 2.5m from the TV I shouldn't look at anything less than 50" if I'm going to notice the benefits of HD.
Equally lots of people have said that the SD performance of large screens is really quite poor.
At first I expect the TV will be used mainly for SD with the occasional HD (from blu-ray/possibly freesat), as I can't yet afford Sky and my area isn't cabled.
But on the other hand I don't intend to replace the TV for 3 or 4 years - I'm paying for it with money from my 21st birthday and a sign-on bonus from starting work - neither of which will be seen again, so I'm unlikely to be able to afford to change it until I'm qualified (3 yrs) and recieve the resulting pay rise! But in te next 3-4 years I expect HD broadcasting will become normal - by that time analogue will have gone. So I don't want to sacrifice HD performance too much.
I'm prepared to push the budget to the £1000 mark for the right TV - but any thoughts on how to weigh up the big size for HD vs avoid big and full HD ready TV for SD watching?
Is the only option to go to an independent store and get them to show me TVs when they've been set up right?
Thanks again!
At the end of the day its down to which model you feel gives the best picture, bearing in mind all the relevant factors...Distance, SD and HD image, cost etc etc. I think the advice that Derestrictor and others have given including myself, bearing in mind we all sell and install televisions. is pretty well spot on....Go for the 42G10 or 15.
When you go into the store make sure yo usee the image showing standard telly signals as well as HD or Blu Ray. If they cant or wont show you SD telly pictures then walk away!
When you go into the store make sure yo usee the image showing standard telly signals as well as HD or Blu Ray. If they cant or wont show you SD telly pictures then walk away!
Following advice from people on here about the Panny being the best for the money, I got that.
I'm very very happy with it. I just use it for normal TV and DVD's (though I discovered the SD slot yesterday - I now have a 42" photoframe that looks superb) and I really can't fault it.
I've not got the rivals so I can't comment on how good they are. What I will say is that I'm very happy with the Panny and if a meteor hit my house tomorrow, I'd buy another with the insurance money - I wouldn't bother considering alternatives.
I'm very very happy with it. I just use it for normal TV and DVD's (though I discovered the SD slot yesterday - I now have a 42" photoframe that looks superb) and I really can't fault it.
I've not got the rivals so I can't comment on how good they are. What I will say is that I'm very happy with the Panny and if a meteor hit my house tomorrow, I'd buy another with the insurance money - I wouldn't bother considering alternatives.
tenohfive said:
Following advice from people on here about the Panny being the best for the money, I got that.
I'm very very happy with it. I just use it for normal TV and DVD's (though I discovered the SD slot yesterday - I now have a 42" photoframe that looks superb) and I really can't fault it.
I've not got the rivals so I can't comment on how good they are. What I will say is that I'm very happy with the Panny and if a meteor hit my house tomorrow, I'd buy another with the insurance money - I wouldn't bother considering alternatives.
Not sure if the 5 year warranty covers meteors!I'm very very happy with it. I just use it for normal TV and DVD's (though I discovered the SD slot yesterday - I now have a 42" photoframe that looks superb) and I really can't fault it.
I've not got the rivals so I can't comment on how good they are. What I will say is that I'm very happy with the Panny and if a meteor hit my house tomorrow, I'd buy another with the insurance money - I wouldn't bother considering alternatives.
jamieboy said:
TonyHetherington said:
I'll be buying the Pan 42G10 very soon - highly recommended by many.
Slight hijack, but how do the G10 / G15 / V10 all stack up?Spend a bit of time reading the extras the V10 and G15 have, and you'll then know whether the extra spend is worth it.
PJ S said:
jamieboy said:
Slight hijack, but how do the G10 / G15 / V10 all stack up?
http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/287749/module/general/compare/products/displayResult.html?p=TX-P42V10&p=TX-P42G15&p=TX-P42G10Spend a bit of time reading the extras the V10 and G15 have, and you'll then know whether the extra spend is worth it.
Something like "the G15 is probably worth £100 over the G10, the V10 isn't worth £100 on top of that".
jamieboy said:
PJ S said:
jamieboy said:
Slight hijack, but how do the G10 / G15 / V10 all stack up?
http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/287749/module/general/compare/products/displayResult.html?p=TX-P42V10&p=TX-P42G15&p=TX-P42G10Spend a bit of time reading the extras the V10 and G15 have, and you'll then know whether the extra spend is worth it.
Something like "the G15 is probably worth £100 over the G10, the V10 isn't worth £100 on top of that".
Coupled with the lesser reflections and other nik naks, it's possibly money well spent in light of using for the next 3-5 years before thinking of changing to something else.
Gassing Station | Home Cinema & Hi-Fi | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff