Improving Virgin picture quality?

Improving Virgin picture quality?

Author
Discussion

clonmult

Original Poster:

10,529 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
Got an LG 42PQ6000 plasma set, and picture quality through the Wii/PS3 is absolutely fantastic. However the Virgin standard def picture is decidedly rough (uneven colours), even with a better quality scart cable.

So wondering about going for a V+ HD box. I know that they don't have many HD channels apart from those that the beeb offer, but would piping their standard def image through a HDMI cable improve the SD image at all?

cjs

10,884 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
The V+ box does up-scale the SD picture, I notice an improvement over the Freeview picture on my Panasonic Plasma.

One thing to check on your set up, have you set the output of your V box to RGB rather than PAL or Composite?

clonmult

Original Poster:

10,529 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
Setting the RGB/Composite was the first thing I did on setting up the Virgin box - always set to RGB.

Thats good that it upscales the SD picture. As we were thinking of going from the L to XL TV package, will probably only have to pay for the V+ box and no additional monthly subs for the package.

cjs

10,884 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
I got my V+ box for free, I did have to haggle and threaten to leave for Sky. Had it just on a year and am very pleased with it, picture quality on most channels is very good, I just wish Virgin would add more HD channels!

Another option for HD is Freesat.

shoggoth1

815 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
cjs said:
The V+ box does up-scale the SD picture, I notice an improvement over the Freeview picture on my Panasonic Plasma.

One thing to check on your set up, have you set the output of your V box to RGB rather than PAL or Composite?
If you're connected via HDMI then setting to RGB makes no difference, it only affects the SCART output (and is the reason why I almost returned my V+ box within a few hours of installation).

The HDMI port outputs a converted composite signal regardless. I know this because I connected my V+ box via HDMI and SCART at the same time and switched between the two (and then got somewhat annoyed that they chose, when RGB was available, to output the inferior quality signal over HDMI).

clonmult

Original Poster:

10,529 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
shoggoth1 said:
cjs said:
The V+ box does up-scale the SD picture, I notice an improvement over the Freeview picture on my Panasonic Plasma.

One thing to check on your set up, have you set the output of your V box to RGB rather than PAL or Composite?
If you're connected via HDMI then setting to RGB makes no difference, it only affects the SCART output (and is the reason why I almost returned my V+ box within a few hours of installation).

The HDMI port outputs a converted composite signal regardless. I know this because I connected my V+ box via HDMI and SCART at the same time and switched between the two (and then got somewhat annoyed that they chose, when RGB was available, to output the inferior quality signal over HDMI).
I've read on other forums that the V+ box does a good job of upscaling the standard def picture over HDMI - but if its only effectively sending a slightly improved composite picture .... mmmmmm.

Still, going for a V+ box would get us away from the incredibly crappy iPlayer.

cjs

10,884 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
clonmult said:
shoggoth1 said:
cjs said:
The V+ box does up-scale the SD picture, I notice an improvement over the Freeview picture on my Panasonic Plasma.

One thing to check on your set up, have you set the output of your V box to RGB rather than PAL or Composite?
If you're connected via HDMI then setting to RGB makes no difference, it only affects the SCART output (and is the reason why I almost returned my V+ box within a few hours of installation).

The HDMI port outputs a converted composite signal regardless. I know this because I connected my V+ box via HDMI and SCART at the same time and switched between the two (and then got somewhat annoyed that they chose, when RGB was available, to output the inferior quality signal over HDMI).
I've read on other forums that the V+ box does a good job of upscaling the standard def picture over HDMI - but if its only effectively sending a slightly improved composite picture .... mmmmmm.

Still, going for a V+ box would get us away from the incredibly crappy iPlayer.
The SD up-scaled quality is also very channel & programme dependant. Some of the lesser channels are awful, fortunately the important ones are good.

V+ Box also has a component RGB (YUV) output, I have not tried this as I connect via HDMI, I will have a go at connecting this up later today as a bit of an experiment, I'll let you know what happens.

shoggoth1

815 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
Don't get me wrong - the picture quality is not bad as such. I just got a little annoyed that I was effectively paying them more money for slightly inferior quality most of the time (apart from the odd occasions when there was something on BBC HD that I wanted to watch). I had the standard 'V' box before.

The RGB signal is a lot sharper than the composite one, but it's only really noticable when you're daft enough (like me) to compare them side by side and then with 'text images', like the on screen TV guide. Normal viewing I doubt you'd notice - it's not something that bothers me (after my initial hissy fit).

cjs

10,884 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
shoggoth1 said:
Don't get me wrong - the picture quality is not bad as such. I just got a little annoyed that I was effectively paying them more money for slightly inferior quality most of the time (apart from the odd occasions when there was something on BBC HD that I wanted to watch). I had the standard 'V' box before.

The RGB signal is a lot sharper than the composite one, but it's only really noticable when you're daft enough (like me) to compare them side by side and then with 'text images', like the on screen TV guide. Normal viewing I doubt you'd notice - it's not something that bothers me (after my initial hissy fit).
Sorry a bit confused. Are you saying you found the RGB Scart picture is better than the up-scaled HDMI Picture?

shoggoth1

815 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
cjs said:
shoggoth1 said:
Don't get me wrong - the picture quality is not bad as such. I just got a little annoyed that I was effectively paying them more money for slightly inferior quality most of the time (apart from the odd occasions when there was something on BBC HD that I wanted to watch). I had the standard 'V' box before.

The RGB signal is a lot sharper than the composite one, but it's only really noticable when you're daft enough (like me) to compare them side by side and then with 'text images', like the on screen TV guide. Normal viewing I doubt you'd notice - it's not something that bothers me (after my initial hissy fit).
Sorry a bit confused. Are you saying you found the RGB Scart picture is better than the up-scaled HDMI Picture?
Yes. When compared the composite picture has a slight fuzziness/lack of definition than RGB, but it's only really noticable with text on screen (like I said, the on screen displays seem to show it up rather well). I don't think the V+ box (or Virgin) do anything 'clever' for HDMI. They just convert/digitise the composite signal for output over HDMI.

clonmult

Original Poster:

10,529 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
shoggoth1 said:
cjs said:
shoggoth1 said:
Don't get me wrong - the picture quality is not bad as such. I just got a little annoyed that I was effectively paying them more money for slightly inferior quality most of the time (apart from the odd occasions when there was something on BBC HD that I wanted to watch). I had the standard 'V' box before.

The RGB signal is a lot sharper than the composite one, but it's only really noticable when you're daft enough (like me) to compare them side by side and then with 'text images', like the on screen TV guide. Normal viewing I doubt you'd notice - it's not something that bothers me (after my initial hissy fit).
Sorry a bit confused. Are you saying you found the RGB Scart picture is better than the up-scaled HDMI Picture?
Yes. When compared the composite picture has a slight fuzziness/lack of definition than RGB, but it's only really noticable with text on screen (like I said, the on screen displays seem to show it up rather well). I don't think the V+ box (or Virgin) do anything 'clever' for HDMI. They just convert/digitise the composite signal for output over HDMI.
Are you sure thats what they do - have you seen it written somewhere?

Its just odd, as the signal is coming in via digital means, and to "just" convert the composite signal for HDMI seems utterly ludicrous. But then the whole Virgin setup is close on ludicrous at times ....

cjs

10,884 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
shoggoth1 said:
cjs said:
shoggoth1 said:
Don't get me wrong - the picture quality is not bad as such. I just got a little annoyed that I was effectively paying them more money for slightly inferior quality most of the time (apart from the odd occasions when there was something on BBC HD that I wanted to watch). I had the standard 'V' box before.

The RGB signal is a lot sharper than the composite one, but it's only really noticable when you're daft enough (like me) to compare them side by side and then with 'text images', like the on screen TV guide. Normal viewing I doubt you'd notice - it's not something that bothers me (after my initial hissy fit).
Sorry a bit confused. Are you saying you found the RGB Scart picture is better than the up-scaled HDMI Picture?
Yes. When compared the composite picture has a slight fuzziness/lack of definition than RGB, but it's only really noticable with text on screen (like I said, the on screen displays seem to show it up rather well). I don't think the V+ box (or Virgin) do anything 'clever' for HDMI. They just convert/digitise the composite signal for output over HDMI.
Surely, if that is the case, you would be better off running on Scart RGB rather than HDMI?

shoggoth1

815 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
clonmult said:
Are you sure thats what they do - have you seen it written somewhere?
Not seen anything written, empirical data. I ran HDMI and SCART side by side and it is the standard composite output over HDMI. I seen it with my own eyes I tells ya.

clonmult said:
Its just odd, as the signal is coming in via digital means, and to "just" convert the composite signal for HDMI seems utterly ludicrous. But then the whole Virgin setup is close on ludicrous at times ....
Yes, you see now why I almost had phone in hand a couple of hours after installation to demand that they come and remove it forthwith. It does seem rather daft.

cjs said:
Surely, if that is the case, you would be better off running on Scart RGB rather than HDMI?
If you want the best SD picture quality and can be bothered then yes, use SCART/RGB (and optical TOSlink for audio). Use HDMI on the odd occasion there is something you want to watch on BBC HD (the only HD channel you currently get with Virgin).

But, as previously stated, at normal viewing distances, watching normal telly I doubt you'll notice to be honest.

shoggoth1

815 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th May 2009
quotequote all
Right, disregard what I've said. I decided to do a bit research.

Clonmult, I found your post on avforums about this and the first response states that you can get better picture quality by setting the V+ box to output 720 rather than 1080 - I've just tried this and my on screen display 'fuzziness' is dramatically improved - now at least as good as SCART/RGB. Thanks for that. smile

If anyone else is interested:
http://www.avforums.com/forums/virgin-media/991812...