SVA Today - Brake Bias Setup
SVA Today - Brake Bias Setup
Author
Discussion

mclark

Original Poster:

582 posts

265 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Well today I took my car to the SVA but sadly failed on the brake bias adjusment.

Strangely I removed the locking mechanism and tweeked it on the fly (at one stage moving the bar all the way from one side to the other) but this made absolutely no difference.

When they run the original failed data through their computer but in reverse it would pass but this meant I had the cylinders the wrong way round. Spoke to the factory and I do have them correct.

There was minimal braking difference between front & back.

Any pointers to what can be wrong, other than swap the cylinders just for the SVA.

Cheers

Michael

Oooo, so close but yet so far on first attempt.

davefiddes

846 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Did you bed the pads/disc in on the way to SVA as per the AP instruction sheet? This makes a huge difference to the braking output compared with pedal input.

mclark

Original Poster:

582 posts

265 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Hi David,

Luckily I managed to rack about 40 ish miles on them prior to today.

I'm going to bled the system again just to be sure, how much travel do you have in your pedal before the brakes bite?

Michael

steve_D

13,802 posts

287 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
mclark said:
......how much travel do you have in your pedal before the brakes bite?

Michael


None.

Steve

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
I assume you have twin master cylinder with an adjustable balance bar. If both brakes are working but the adjuster is having no effect then my first suspicion would be that you have run out of angular travel on the balance bar.

steve_D

13,802 posts

287 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
If all the bits are in the right place and you need to ask how much travel then I'm sure it's air in the system.
I have no free travel and the balance bar sits almost central.

Steve

mclark

Original Poster:

582 posts

265 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Cheers guys, fingers crossed it's just air then.

Michael

pee

210 posts

278 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Hey Mclark

Which way round do you have the masters? You should have the .625 to the front and the .75 to the rear. This is the way that you get more line pressure to the front.

By the way well done you've got to be well pleased
Cheers Pee

>> Edited by pee on Thursday 4th August 09:31

mclark

Original Poster:

582 posts

265 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Hi Pee,

I phoned the factory during the test and they confirmed the front should be .75 and the rears .625.

Yes, after the initial disappointment had worn off I was very pleased to come away with just this.

Now need to find a rolling road in Essex/Herts to get the car running/setup correctly.

Cheers

Michael

pee

210 posts

278 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Sorry to break it to you, but that's round the wrong way. To get more pressure to the front you need to put the .625 on the front and .75 on the rear.
This change will solve all your problems.

Cheers Pee

pee

210 posts

278 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
With all due respect it doesn't make sense having more line pressure to the rear with equal size disks and calipers. All that will end up happening is you'll have more breaking force on the rear than the front which can be a little tricky especially in the wet.

Cheers Pee

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
pee said:
With all due respect ... etc

You seem to be assuming equal weight distribution? If the car was rear-heavy with equal caliper and disc sizes front/rear then balanced braking would require higher line pressure at the rear.

pee

210 posts

278 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Don't forget Green V8s that under breaking you get front end dive so therefor the weight is being sent to the front and as you say the disks are the same size front and back so that would be compensation for the weight split without offering it more line pressure.

Factory, I'm not arguing with you I am trying to obtain as much info so I can have the car as well set up as possible. Could you please tell me some more of the factors you are refering to.

Cheers Pee

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
pee said:
Don't forget Green V8s that under breaking you get front end dive so therefor the weight is being sent to the front


That is (or should be) taken care of by the bias valve, not by the static balance.

gtrclive

4,193 posts

312 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all

I had my set up the factory way, but the balance bar was hard over I could only get 58/42 I could not get any front bias... Spoke to AP they have a setup that needs to be followed closely.. The balance bar should be setup so that it is level when under normal braking force, so when at rest with your foot of the pedal it is at an angle. The larger cylinder puts up more resistance so will travel less. The smaller cylinder puts up less resistance so travels further.

Got it so far......

So they say (untested by me but this is AP I spoke to)
The smaller cylinder due to traveling further etc will produce more pressure i.e. Front (even though I didn't have this on the GTR, but I'm no braking demon) I did not know about this until recently but the GTR I'm building has a Brake pressure sensing device so I will test both ways and report back when I've tried both setups......

Not trying to step on anyone’s toes here, just relaying information I have, as this is what forums are all about.....

All the best GTRClive

PS I had a SPA Brake pressure gauge on my GTR so that’s how I knew what I had…

gtrclive

4,193 posts

312 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Just on the weight split discussion etc. my car Had 58% front on my SPA Gauge and passed first time so you can though wieght split out the window as far as SVA is concerned.....

gtrclive

4,193 posts

312 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
www.wilwood.com/Products/005-PedalAssemblies/Pages/techtip/pedaltech.asp

This is how Wilwood Setup there Balance bars.. Interesting reading....

gtrclive

4,193 posts

312 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Note the 5-6mm side float on the bar ends....

pee

210 posts

278 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Sorry guys, thought about this more and there is no way that this car should be running more breaking force to the rear. If you watch the 0-100-0 test you'll see the rears starting to lock and not the front.

mclark if you change them over you'll sort out all your problems. If you doubt me speak to anybody who deals with AP breaking systems and race cars.
Cheers Pee

layada

112 posts

261 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
gtrclive said:

The smaller cylinder due to traveling further etc will produce more pressure i.e. Front (even though I didn't have this on the GTR, but I'm no braking demon) I did not know about this until recently but the GTR I'm building has a Brake pressure sensing device so I will test both ways and report back when I've tried both setups......



Fortunatley hydraulics is not a wholly black art (although some people may have you bellieve it is). It acts as simply as a gearbox might with ratios.

In this case, its the ratio of the master piston area (not volume)to the caliper piston area. The smaller master cylinder, the *greater* the pressure exerted on the caliper piston.

Be cautious of your new pressure guages - absolute line pressure does not by itself indicate very much at all. However the ratio of pressures between front an rear lines will indicate relative breaking effort applied to the front and rear tyres... (assuming identical calipers, rotors and wheel sizes etc)

Look forward to your figures..

adam