Jordan Collard

[GR86]

Would he have been caught if he had a front number plate?

Although to be driving something like that you must be a bit of a plank.

[Dave46]

stevieturbo said:

vagina ?

Next time I see a Navara that's all I'm gonna see now

Edited by Dave46 on Friday 9th December 11:49

[andrewcliffe]

If his front number plate hadn't fallen off, he'd had been done on illegal spacing as JC12ACE on 'Nelly the Navara' had been made to appear as JC RACE at first glance, made by his own handmade number plate business.

[stevieturbo]

pablo said:

Not sure what your point is, wait until someone has committed a crime before pulling them over? It’s very hard for the police to pull over every numpty who may potentially be at fault in an accident, best to pull over those who stand out by nothing obeying simple rules, chances are the are guilty of other offences

Either way there are pictures of the truck on THE Jordan Collard’s instagram page along with pictures of very fast racing cars including McLarens, BRDC references etc but stupid games, win stupid prizes is the old adage isn’t it….

In a way I feel sorry for him, on face value a stupid decision has cost him severely, on the other hand, this may be a regular occurrence…..

Is it not normal for police to wait until a "crime" has been committed ? Do you think it is good practice, to ignore people who have actually caused crashes, damage and harm ? Yet proactively target those who have not ?
Which have proven themselves more dangerous ? those who caused a crash, or those who did not ?

And it's very easy to attend crashes where there has been a dangerous driver who caused it. After all, it seems easy for them to task police to stand with speed cameras all day doing nothing productive. So why not do something useful instead like target those who have actually caused crashes and harm ? Those who have proven themselves dangerous without question ?

[anonymous-user]

stevieturbo said:

Is it not normal for police to wait until a "crime" has been committed ? Do you think it is good practice, to ignore people who have actually caused crashes, damage and harm ? Yet proactively target those who have not ?
Which have proven themselves more dangerous ? those who caused a crash, or those who did not ?

And it's very easy to attend crashes where there has been a dangerous driver who caused it. After all, it seems easy for them to task police to stand with speed cameras all day doing nothing productive. So why not do something useful instead like target those who have actually caused crashes and harm ? Those who have proven themselves dangerous without question ?

A crime was committed. No number plate. But If you’re going to drive whilst under the influence of something, don’t give the police an opportunity to pull you over by not having a number plate on display…. By removing this guy from the road, it may have prevented him continuing to drive whilst under the influence and causing a serious accident next week…. So I don’t follow your logic really, the police didn’t target him, he made itself a target.

[Dingu]

stevieturbo said:

Is it not normal for police to wait until a "crime" has been committed ? Do you think it is good practice, to ignore people who have actually caused crashes, damage and harm ? Yet proactively target those who have not ?
Which have proven themselves more dangerous ? those who caused a crash, or those who did not ?

And it's very easy to attend crashes where there has been a dangerous driver who caused it. After all, it seems easy for them to task police to stand with speed cameras all day doing nothing productive. So why not do something useful instead like target those who have actually caused crashes and harm ? Those who have proven themselves dangerous without question ?

Defending driving under the influence is a weird hill to die on. Ridiculous.