General Grabber UHPs

General Grabber UHPs

Author
Discussion

Dan Friel

Original Poster:

3,823 posts

285 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
Having just entered the 4x4 world I wondered what the consensus on these is? Not really heard of them. Seem very good on the cold roads, and will only be used for light off road use..

stone-islandV8

163 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
Just my opinion but I'd go Grabber AT2s, tread looks better for what you want and can't fault mine on either the Jeep or the truck.

plasticpig

12,932 posts

232 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
Another vote for AT2's. Although someone posted one here that they were being discontinued.

Stu R

21,410 posts

222 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
Very impressed with them. I replaced the Freelander's road tyres with them as a more civilised alternative to AT2s - I didn't want the road noise associated with more knobbly tyres, nor to kill the handling by having big soft sidewalls on a car which seemingly prefers a slightly stiffer sidewall. They're actually grippier than the FL2's OEM tyres, which I wasn't expecting, and they've yet to see me stuck on any green lanes or fields, of which it's been through many, and they've handled 2 foot of snow deftly.

I think for a road orientated tyre, they're stunning frankly. Cheap as chips too smile

AT2s are better off road, but UHP's are significantly better on road, as well as being not bad at all off road.

Edited by Stu R on Wednesday 1st December 17:52

stone-islandV8

163 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
http://www.generaltire.com/

No problems with either onroad manners or noise from the AT2s.

Dan Friel

Original Poster:

3,823 posts

285 months

Wednesday 1st December 2010
quotequote all
All very reassuring..