DVD-Audio?

Author
Discussion

LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

219 months

Thursday 26th June 2008
quotequote all
Having recently heard the Beatles Love album, I am amazed this format never took off.

Just ordered Metallica's Black Album it a slightly high price of £25 (though a bargain when they are selling for $170 on some sites!). Looking forward to a blast when it comes. biggrin

So, any of you have prized discs from a bygone format of excellence?

ETA In fact add SACD!

Edited by LaSarthe+Back on Thursday 26th June 22:43

clived

577 posts

246 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
Yeah smile I've got a fairly big collection of SACD, DVD-A and even a few DTS audio-only discs. If you're into this stuff you might also want to check out the HDAD stuff (like Alan Parsons' "I, Robot") which is a not-quite standards compliant spin off of DVD-A, stereo only, and sounds great smile

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
The general public just aren't interested in sound quality, they prefer convenience. I've a DVDA/SACD player and the quality is sublime but as the format never took off there's a very small selection of albums available.

Didn't help that this format was never advertised I'd wager most people don't even know what they are.


Stamp

3,589 posts

242 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
A lot of the Linn download you can have at DVD-A quality.ears
I downloaded Judith Owen at higher rate to burn to DVD-A and it is great.
I have a few REM, Tubular bells etc.
There are quite a few topics on this on the Hitch-hikers guide to Meridian, the forums for Meridian Audio, as their flagship stuff plays DVD-A, like minecloud9

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
What you reckon, 24-bit digital or vinyl?


LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

219 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
What you reckon, 24-bit digital or vinyl?
Digital all the way. In an analogue system you can't do very much with it. With digital, there are endless algorithms you can apply to give such different sound.


JustinP1

13,330 posts

236 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
The Seal Greatest hits DVDA as superb.

Also REM Greatest Hits and Fleetwood Mac Rumours are excellent.

On a good system, that is the best audio experience I have heard. Going back to stereo CD after having that on 7.1 surround you can really tell the difference...

clonmult

10,529 posts

215 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
LaSarthe+Back said:
qube_TA said:
What you reckon, 24-bit digital or vinyl?
Digital all the way. In an analogue system you can't do very much with it. With digital, there are endless algorithms you can apply to give such different sound.
But do you continually change the algorithms on your DAC? And doing that is little different to the differences between solid state and valve amps, class a, etc.

LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

219 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
clonmult said:
LaSarthe+Back said:
qube_TA said:
What you reckon, 24-bit digital or vinyl?
Digital all the way. In an analogue system you can't do very much with it. With digital, there are endless algorithms you can apply to give such different sound.
But do you continually change the algorithms on your DAC? And doing that is little different to the differences between solid state and valve amps, class a, etc.
Going by your job description, I would expect you to know the advantages of being able to manipulate data/information bit by bit.

Digital is simply much more efficient than analogue systems. While they have their own sound, that is mostly a function of the inaccurate components they must use [for fat crossovers].

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Sure you can use a DSP on a digital signal but you can also do that on an analog one (albeit with more noise) but why on earth would you want to? You'll be buying a graphic equaliser next!

For my ears a high quality vinyl setup was always the ultimate until SACD came out, they're just fabulous. I've little time for surround sound though.


LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

219 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
...I've little time for surround sound though...
Maybe cos you've not seen it to its full potential?

Do you like Pink Floyd? The DSOTM original quadrophonic tapes in surround is jaw dropping.

clonmult

10,529 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
LaSarthe+Back said:
clonmult said:
LaSarthe+Back said:
qube_TA said:
What you reckon, 24-bit digital or vinyl?
Digital all the way. In an analogue system you can't do very much with it. With digital, there are endless algorithms you can apply to give such different sound.
But do you continually change the algorithms on your DAC? And doing that is little different to the differences between solid state and valve amps, class a, etc.
Going by your job description, I would expect you to know the advantages of being able to manipulate data/information bit by bit.

Digital is simply much more efficient than analogue systems. While they have their own sound, that is mostly a function of the inaccurate components they must use [for fat crossovers].
But efficient does not necessarily equal improved/"better" sound.

I was brought up on high end vinyl systems, and have seen digital audio progress in leaps over the years, i've heard no end of systems at all levels on both analogue and digital, and I still prefer the analogue systems I've heard.

Got an old mate who reviews kit for one of the UK audio mags, and the killer for me is that his primary source is vinyl, even though he's got access to the best analogue/digital kit on the market. Although said deck is a Basis, used to have a Debut Gold, unsure of what he's upgraded to from their product line.

AngryS3Owner

15,855 posts

235 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
I've got a few DVD-A and the DSOTM SACD and they do sound rather good, but not as good as I'd hoped compared to some normal DVD concerts I've got (DTS ones).

I think for multi channel music you really do need the speakers set-up how they suggest and for my 7.1 it's just not going to happen to have another set of speakers just for music at the rear.

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
LaSarthe+Back said:
qube_TA said:
...I've little time for surround sound though...
Maybe cos you've not seen it to its full potential?

Do you like Pink Floyd? The DSOTM original quadrophonic tapes in surround is jaw dropping.
I have most of the PF quad albums plus a few by Mike Oldfield, I still have a Sony quadraphonic amp.

Having sounds come at you from all angles is interesting but hardly jaw-dropping. I'm not saying it's bad but it's the higher resolution that makes me interested in SACD/DVD-A not the multi-channel ability of it.


Plotloss

67,280 posts

276 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
DVD-A played on a THX array configured in the ASA style with the amp running in Music Mode is utterly utterly utterly fabulous.

The overall effect is significantly better than even the stereo beards can create.

clonmult

10,529 posts

215 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
DVD-A played on a THX array configured in the ASA style with the amp running in Music Mode is utterly utterly utterly fabulous.

The overall effect is significantly better than even the stereo beards can create.
A well setup THX array is utterly incredible. Even the old THX train intro, or the THX logo just blew people away.

telecat

8,528 posts

247 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
I love DVD-Audio the shame is that it is not exploited to the Maximum. Most of the Disc's I have are 24/48 which is really good except with a DAC64, CD works better!! My player is a Technics DVD-A10.

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
In the studio music is generally recorded at 24 bit/96KHz and has been for a while, it's then converted to 16 bits for use on CD's n MP3's which makes the music sound squashed and messy if there's a lot going on, the HD audio discs cure that by giving you essentially a bit-for-bit identical copy of the studio master. There's no way a CD can be better unless the HD version is a really bad master.




telecat

8,528 posts

247 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
In the studio music is generally recorded at 24 bit/96KHz and has been for a while, it's then converted to 16 bits for use on CD's n MP3's which makes the music sound squashed and messy if there's a lot going on, the HD audio discs cure that by giving you essentially a bit-for-bit identical copy of the studio master. There's no way a CD can be better unless the HD version is a really bad master.
I'd doubt that. Most studio's are capable of 24/96 but not much is recorded to that quality at the moment. If you really want to get the best out of DVD-Audio I'd recommend the Audio Synthesis Dax Discrete with a Transcend modified Transport, or the Townsend TA565.

qube_TA

8,405 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Nah, stuff has been recorded at 24 bit since the early 90's. Ever since hard disc recorders came in they've been high resolution. My home PC has been able to do it for over 10 years so I'm fairly confident that your average professional recording studio can.