777
Author
Discussion

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,370 posts

207 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Just landed back from Orlando on a BA operated 777, speed reading on moving map at one point was 734mph with a 187mph tailwind. Knocked the journey down to just over 6 hrs, result!! Is this sort of speed normal?

Wheelrepairit

3,044 posts

233 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Highish, but fairly normal.

tuffer

9,003 posts

296 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
You were just behind me then.....Just landed back from Dubai on a BA 777. New format one with the latest seats and entertainment system (not that I used it as I was unconscious before take off). Nice kite but I still prefer 4 engines.

nevgroom

2,183 posts

188 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
jontysafe said:
Just landed back from Orlando on a BA operated 777, speed reading on moving map at one point was 734mph with a 187mph tailwind. Knocked the journey down to just over 6 hrs, result!! Is this sort of speed normal?
Ground speed = 734, Air speed = approx 547. Stated cruising speed is 560mph spo about normal - That tailwind was a good one though, just over 6 hours is pretty neat!!

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,370 posts

207 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies. Have any Boeings or Airbuses ever got near the speed of sound?

Landed Gatwick and now Athens bound from Heathrow, exhausted!

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
I was on a BA 777 out of JFK a few years ago with 200mph windspeeds and you could hear the pilot throttling it back, we made up a 45 minute delay and landed so early into LHR they had to shut the engines town and be towed to the terminal for noise regs (we landed 5.50am IIRC).

DieselGriff

5,160 posts

288 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Was there much turbulence? I've experienced similar tail winds before especially when flying east but each time the turbulence was so bad the dollies stopped serving drinks frown

nevgroom

2,183 posts

188 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
DieselGriff said:
Was there much turbulence? I've experienced similar tail winds before especially when flying east but each time the turbulence was so bad the dollies stopped serving drinks frown
Definitely on a couple of flights back from Miami (Virgin a340-600), turbulance was mayhem!!

Soovy

35,829 posts

300 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all

Four engines please.


mattdaniels

7,362 posts

311 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
jontysafe said:
Have any Boeings or Airbuses ever got near the speed of sound?
Yes the Boeing F/18 has, many times. rofl

spitfire-ian

4,209 posts

257 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Soovy said:
Four engines please.
I quite agree!

2 engines just doesn't seem right.

rolty

239 posts

226 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Had a pretty good tailwind from Atlanta to Manchester overnight on Tuesday. Left ATL one time, but arrived at MAN 45 early. Tailwinds of around 100mph all the way so groundspeed was pushing 650mph!

Edit: Should have said this was on N185DN: http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/N185DN.html

Edited by rolty on Friday 11th February 13:20

-crookedtail-

1,593 posts

219 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
rolty said:
Edit: Should have said this was on N185DN: http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/N185DN.html

Edited by rolty on Friday 11th February 13:20
Those 767s look awesome with winglets!

eharding

14,648 posts

313 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
As the 747 nears retirement your only option for 4 engines will be the A380 - and from recent experience it looks like the engines on either wing of an A380 have formed unions - one out, the other one stops talking to the management.

Edited: Alright, you can have the A340 as well...


Edited by eharding on Friday 11th February 13:36

Wheelrepairit

3,044 posts

233 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
eharding said:
As the 747 nears retirement your only option for 4 engines will be the A380 - and from recent experience it looks like the engines on either wing of an A380 have formed unions - one out, the other one stops talking to the management.
What about the A340

rolty

239 posts

226 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
-crookedtail- said:
Those 767s look awesome with winglets!
They do, I hadn't seen one in the metal before last week. They're huge compared to the ones one 737NG aircraft!

rolty

239 posts

226 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Wheelrepairit said:
What about the A340
And the 747-8 which is due to roll out later this month

As an aside, check out the size of the engines for the 747-8 compared to the ones that were fitted on the early 747's!



Edited by rolty on Friday 11th February 13:41

eharding

14,648 posts

313 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
rolty said:
And the 747-8 which is due to roll out later this month
But then Soovy would only have the option of flying Lufthansa, Korean or...er....cargo

Fat Albert

1,462 posts

210 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Don't forget that the speed of sound relates to airspeed not groundspeed, so even if your groundspeed was over 1000mph, unless the airspeed is greater than 760mph (at sea level) then you are still very subsonic....

Soovy

35,829 posts

300 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
eharding said:
But then Soovy would only have the option of flying Lufthansa, Korean or...er....cargo
Netjets smile