This Must Be Borderline Take Off Conditions!!
This Must Be Borderline Take Off Conditions!!
Author
Discussion

Urban Sports

Original Poster:

11,321 posts

232 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
yikes

I fly regularly but this would have had me a bit panicked!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9IhQxmt08U

pacman1

7,324 posts

222 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Look on the bright side, it kept the pilot awake.
getmecoat

Bebee

4,724 posts

254 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Good link, this also made me shiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EHPxeRWzRI&fea...

Stu R

21,628 posts

244 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
pacman1 said:
Look on the bright side, it kept the pilot awake.
getmecoat
...and the blades on the engines were sparkling clean afterwards biggrin

Edited by Stu R on Sunday 28th November 19:01

speedtwelve

3,546 posts

302 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Reminds me of an Aussie F-111 crew that attempted to get airborne in the '70s from a rather wet runway. Just as they were nearing rotate speed they suffered a double engine flameout due to water ingestion, followed by nil braking action as the aeroplane was by now handling more like a powerboat. Faced with the end of the runway approaching at a higher rate of knots than they would consider ideal, the crew then proved that the F-111's ejectable crew module worked just fine when fired on the ground.

The OP's clip does indeed look quite sporty. I'm sure the passengers loved it.

mattdaniels

7,362 posts

311 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Can't see a problem?

Simpo Two

92,639 posts

294 months

Sunday 28th November 2010
quotequote all
Piston engines can benefit from water injection but I'm not sure about jets!

Seemed he tried to unstick once and failed?

Flintstone

8,644 posts

276 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
mattdaniels said:
Can't see a problem?
Me neither.

Eric Mc

125,596 posts

294 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Piston engines can benefit from water injection but I'm not sure about jets!

Seemed he tried to unstick once and failed?
Water injection was common on earlier jets such as the original Boeing 707 and DC-8. This was the reason why their take-offs were notoriously smokey.

Here's a clip of B-52s taking off using water injection.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq6Hpxyrhyo

The real Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
mattdaniels said:
Can't see a problem?
Me neither.
Took off from Atlanta in the middle of an ice storm, just before de-icing the windows were covered in a layer that looked about an inch thick, the de-icing machinery was the daddy though and looked like something from a Sci Fi film........still, I was bricking it for the first time in a lifetime of flying both civvie and mil

Simpo Two

92,639 posts

294 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Here's a clip of B-52s taking off using water injection.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq6Hpxyrhyo
Ah, the power of editing - they got 15 seconds down to 8 smile

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

213 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Water injection was common on earlier jets such as the original Boeing 707 and DC-8. This was the reason why their take-offs were notoriously smokey.
It's also used on the Harrier to boost thrust for heavy weight hover/landings.

Shar2

2,268 posts

242 months

Monday 29th November 2010
quotequote all
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Eric Mc said:
Water injection was common on earlier jets such as the original Boeing 707 and DC-8. This was the reason why their take-offs were notoriously smokey.
It's also used on the Harrier to boost thrust for heavy weight hover/landings.
The Sea Harriers used it every time they landed on the carriers no matter what weight they were at. Gave the pilots that extra bit of leeway to get the landing right.

khaosai

120 posts

228 months

Tuesday 30th November 2010
quotequote all
Hi,

looks fairly challenging judging by the position of the control surfaces on top of the wing. All good fun i guess !

mrloudly

2,815 posts

264 months

Tuesday 30th November 2010
quotequote all
pacman1 said:
Look on the bright side, it kept the pilot awake.
getmecoat
You might laugh wink