Plane overshoots runway @ Madrid airport
Plane overshoots runway @ Madrid airport
Author
Discussion

oobster

Original Poster:

7,558 posts

233 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Just seen the Breaking News on BBC News 24

A plane has overshot the runway at Madrid Barajas airport (Terminal 4) and 'deaths are feared'.

gazza_3

6,432 posts

230 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Just turned over now. Spanair, haven't they had A few issues before?

Edited by gazza_3 on Wednesday 20th August 14:21

Fly Boy

1,282 posts

263 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
On CNN now, Spanair 160pax onboard & onfire eek

Hope they all get off ok

dan1981

17,948 posts

221 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
bbc linky

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7572643.stm

how do you "slip off" on take off???

Fittster

20,120 posts

235 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Fly Boy said:
On CNN now, Spanair 160pax onboard & onfire eek

Hope they all get off ok
What does 160pax mean?

_Batty_

12,268 posts

272 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
2 dead 20 injured apparently...
engine fire on left...

Edited by _Batty_ on Wednesday 20th August 14:26


Edited by _Batty_ on Wednesday 20th August 14:26

gazza_3

6,432 posts

230 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Fly Boy said:
On CNN now, Spanair 160pax onboard & onfire eek

Hope they all get off ok
What does 160pax mean?



160 Passengers.

ALawson

8,014 posts

273 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
160 passengers.

NDA

24,582 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
What does 160pax mean?
It's Spanish miles per hour.

HTH

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

270 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
That flight should be an Airbus A321. Interesting that it happened on take-off...

gazza_3

6,432 posts

230 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
They are saying its an engine fire, I doubt that could cause an aircraft to crash. They could have stopped I.E before V1 and if not they could have taken off I.E after V1. Well I think thats right hehe

El Capitano

1,157 posts

215 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
gazza_3 said:
They are saying its an engine fire, I doubt that could cause an aircraft to crash. They could have stopped I.E before V1 and if not they could have taken off I.E after V1. Well I think thats right hehe
yup...

pilot error im assuming

Munter

31,330 posts

263 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
These things never normally come down to 1 thing though do they. It'll be Engine fire = problem 1 and some other unknown problem which left the plane unable to deal with problem 1.

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

270 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Sorry I was wrong, it is an MD-82...

Edited by Bee_Jay on Wednesday 20th August 14:37

gazza_3

6,432 posts

230 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Bee_Jay said:
Sorry I was wrong, it is an MD-82...

Edited by Bee_Jay on Wednesday 20th August 14:37


I wonder if the engine problem may hav damaged one of the rear control surfaces?

_Batty_

12,268 posts

272 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
maybe none dead smile

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

270 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Indeed, engine fire in an MD-82 would give you serious issues with rear control surfaces, plus having to very quickly deal with a thrust imbalance - recipe for disaster...

Vipers

33,403 posts

250 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
I can see another 20 pages at least!

smile

Roop

6,018 posts

306 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Bee_Jay said:
Sorry I was wrong, it is an MD-82...
Didn't know those things were still flying...!!!

phumy

5,812 posts

259 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
gazza_3 said:
Bee_Jay said:
Sorry I was wrong, it is an MD-82...

Edited by Bee_Jay on Wednesday 20th August 14:37


I wonder if the engine problem may hav damaged one of the rear control surfaces?
Nothing like good old speculation, what! rolleyes