Another good reason to keep your belt on.
Discussion
This could have been so much worse. Catastrophic engine failure, fan blade detatching punching through the nacelle and debris impacting the fuselage breaking the window.

Video of the damage - https://x.com/_stavmat/status/2075597900868997609
Video of the damage - https://x.com/_stavmat/status/2075597900868997609
It wasn't long ago that O'Leary was proposing that being sucked off, when Flying Ryanair, was going to be introduced as a cost option.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfIY24BErBE
craig1912 said:
He was wearing a seat belt
Yeah, there is more emerging about this incident.https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/l0058lqf/man...
As ever, Juan gives his comprehensive take on things here.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RlIO_91ceoQ&pp=y...
As 48 K has already mentioned, it could have been so much worse.
Crumpet said:
Was this kind of thing common back in the day when engines were nowhere near as reliable?
Earlier jet engines didn't have such large fans - some had none (pure turbojets).So fan failure was rarer on engines with much smaller fan assemblies at the front - or no fans at all.
The other factor is that there just so many airliners flying around today compared to the 80s and earlier.
When the 727 production line ended, just over 1,800 had been built - and that was a record for a jet airliner at the time.
Now we have production runs for some airliners of over 10,000 - such as the later variant 737s and the Airbus A320 family (all of which feature high bypass large fan turbofan engines).
s2000db said:
Aren t jet engines designed to contain all the debris from a fan blade failure?
Looks like a design or build failure then..
They are, though looking at that the bits were retained from the initial failure, then rattled around and got spat out forward instead through the non armoured part.Looks like a design or build failure then..
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



hanging out the window.