There's alow pass and there's a low pass - Qatar 777
There's alow pass and there's a low pass - Qatar 777
Author
Discussion

swampy442

Original Poster:

1,894 posts

238 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Someones flying rubber dogs $hit out of Hong Kong forever, if they ever fly again!

https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/flight-tracking...

Riley Blue

23,201 posts

253 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
yikesyikesyikes

TheDrownedApe

1,680 posts

83 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
could fit a double decker bus under there mate

Eric Mc

125,186 posts

292 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
swampy442 said:
Someones flying rubber dogs $hit out of Hong Kong forever, if they ever fly again!

https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/flight-tracking...
Ironically, that'sd exactly what this particular cargo conversion of the 777 is designed to do.

Super Sonic

13,581 posts

81 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Is it possible he was going to land, then realised his wheels were up?

Eric Mc

125,186 posts

292 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Is it possible he was going to land, then realised his wheels were up?
It was a flypast performed for the people working at that airfield. It's a business executive jet airfield and not designed for large widebodies.

Condi

20,038 posts

198 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.

He was a sensible separation distance from the people, and the aircraft was never in danger, so aside from some handwringing, what is the issue?

Cue the joke about Buccaneer's taking off then lifting their landing gear to get down to flying altitude. hehe

Master Bean

5,083 posts

147 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Possible interview for Aerosucre?

Eric Mc

125,186 posts

292 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Condi said:
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.

He was a sensible separation distance from the people, and the aircraft was never in danger, so aside from some handwringing, what is the issue?

Cue the joke about Buccaneer's taking off then lifting their landing gear to get down to flying altitude. hehe
That right wingtip seemed awfully close to the ground. He got away with it but there wasn't much margin for error - and I am pretty sure it wasn't something he declared in his original flight plan.

gotoPzero

20,390 posts

216 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Condi said:
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.
Its the flying equivalent of doing a hand brake turn into a parking space at your local tescos.

It looks cool, it can be done with enough skill but if something goes wrong its a bad day.

Most fly pasts in the US are done at 1000ft - those that might be in areas which are less populated can be as low at 500ft.

Lower than that I believe you would need very specific permissions from the FAA etc.

I stand to be corrected though.

48k

17,014 posts

175 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Condi said:
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.

He was a sensible separation distance from the people, and the aircraft was never in danger, so aside from some handwringing, what is the issue?

Cue the joke about Buccaneer's taking off then lifting their landing gear to get down to flying altitude. hehe
At best its incredibly stupid. The right bank at the end could have turned out very badly. This was a new aircraft being delivered and possibly filmed by the trailing helicopter but even so with no landing gear down its incredibly dangerous.

HocusPocus

2,002 posts

128 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
Maverick did fly pasts supersonic, so these pilots must try harder smile

Tango13

9,964 posts

203 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
HocusPocus said:
Maverick did fly pasts supersonic, so these pilots must try harder smile
Apparently Tony Scott enquired about the possibility of an F-14 performing an actual supersonic flypast of the tower whilst filming TopGun

The over pressure would've taken out every window within a couple of miles so they made do with a high subsonic pass instead.



https://www.amazon.co.uk/Never-Anger-Anthony-Bugs-...

This chap actually performed a slightly supersonic run in a Lightning once, it was not well received... rofl

Super Sonic

13,581 posts

81 months

Friday 26th June
quotequote all
HocusPocus said:
Maverick did fly pasts supersonic, so these pilots must try harder smile
Oh ok thanks!

gotoPzero

20,390 posts

216 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
FAA is investigating.
Company that owns the aircraft has issued a statement that its not within their operational procedures.

Either someone was about to retire or someone is going for a short chat without biscuits.

5150

745 posts

282 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
Condi said:
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.

He was a sensible separation distance from the people, and the aircraft was never in danger, so aside from some handwringing, what is the issue?

Cue the joke about Buccaneer's taking off then lifting their landing gear to get down to flying altitude. hehe
Airlines don't want their pilots performing these sort of manoeuvres in their multi million aircraft. Airlines are granted certification to operate based on vetted procedures, normally based on the manufacturer's ops manuals. Any operation (like this) outside of those procedures is deemed as a violation, and is subsequently investigated. If the pilot can't justify going outside of the procedures (say for safety reasons), then they can expect to be made an example of!

Mr Pointy

13,186 posts

186 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
Has it been verified that this really happened & it isn't just an AI clip?

48k

17,014 posts

175 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
Mr Pointy said:
Has it been verified that this really happened & it isn't just an AI clip?
Yes. There's a Flight Radar trace of it.

48k

17,014 posts

175 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
5150 said:
Condi said:
Forgive me here, but I saw this earlier and couldn't work out exactly what (if anything) the pilot had done wrong.

He was a sensible separation distance from the people, and the aircraft was never in danger, so aside from some handwringing, what is the issue?

Cue the joke about Buccaneer's taking off then lifting their landing gear to get down to flying altitude. hehe
Airlines don't want their pilots performing these sort of manoeuvres in their multi million aircraft. Airlines are granted certification to operate based on vetted procedures, normally based on the manufacturer's ops manuals. Any operation (like this) outside of those procedures is deemed as a violation, and is subsequently investigated. If the pilot can't justify going outside of the procedures (say for safety reasons), then they can expect to be made an example of!
It would not be a Qatar Airlines pilot fliying this aircraft. The aircraft had not been handed over to the airline yet having been converted to a freighter. It will have been flown by someone from the converstion company / aircraft ferrying service or maybe the leasing company. It's obviously pre planned to some degree as you don't by chance have a helicopter tracking it and a couple of people on the ground filming but it does have a strong whiff of "watch this" or someone going a bit off-script laugh.


Eric Mc

125,186 posts

292 months

Saturday 27th June
quotequote all
I notice that the aircraft does not seem to have had any flaps or leading edge devices deployed. How slow can a 777 fly with a "clean" wing.
I assume the plane was lighly loaded.