N. Korean Ship launch gone wrong

N. Korean Ship launch gone wrong

Author
Discussion

Decky_Q

Original Poster:

1,794 posts

191 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
I've been looking at the satellite images of the Destroyer launch. To me it looks like the bow section didnt release properly, the stern slid into the water deeper than expected as a result of the pivoting, bottomed out puncturing the hull, and falling over.

Anyone else have any theories? Agree or disagree?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx279v4z9lzo

Wacky Racer

39,728 posts

261 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Some people (and their families) are going to be having some sleepless nights.

Blib

45,961 posts

211 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
Some people (and their families) are going to be having some sleepless nights.
Sleepless: as in 'dead'.

EmailAddress

14,432 posts

232 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Seals Black Team.

CoolHands

20,698 posts

209 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.

hidetheelephants

30,115 posts

207 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Sideways launching is sketchy at the best of times, certainly more prone to incident than lengthwise launching; both are fraught with fk-up potential which is why many shipyards don't do dynamic launches any more. It's probably fit for bean tins and razorblades, but given the ste that the NKs have in their navy it may well be patched up and used for something just to save face.

Condi

18,741 posts

185 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.

ChocolateFrog

31,656 posts

187 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Sounds like the scapegoats have already been lined up for the firing squad.


fooman

274 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.
Looked like the curtains from one of Kims palaces to me.

hidetheelephants

30,115 posts

207 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
Condi said:
Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.
It will have a keel shaped like a dog's hind leg, as long as they don't mind it going sideways it'll be reet.

CoolHands

20,698 posts

209 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
fooman said:
CoolHands said:
I wonder where you find that much blue tarpaulin. Can’t be easy.
Looked like the curtains from one of Kims palaces to me.
biggrin you just made me think, his suits are pretty big… maybe this is a bit of spare material from his tailor

thewarlock

3,281 posts

59 months

Sunday 25th May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Condi said:
Depending how much fitting out they had done - probably not a lot - it could well just be a case of refloating, drying out, repairing any holes and continuing with the program. I would doubt if it's damaged much terminally.
It will have a keel shaped like a dog's hind leg, as long as they don't mind it going sideways it'll be reet.
Probably not.

Depends I guess, at that stage of build it was probably displacing somewhere between 1/2 and 2/3rds of her design deep end of life displacement.

If it was designed to some sensible sort of ruleset (LR, DNV, BV, ABS), which it probably wasn't, but some sort of sensible equivalent sort of design combined still water and wave bending moment for a warship, the hull girder will be pretty damn stiff and strong.

Yes, they've dropped it on its side, but unless they've managed to buckle all the internal decks, it'll probably still be pretty straight.

It'll certainly need some remedial work, but i doubt it's going to be scrap as a result of this.

Popeyed

563 posts

233 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
I stood by two ships as Captain built in South Korea. All of the machinery and ancillary equipment was put in on a slipway, the accommodation was pretty much completed too. They were released down the slipway into the water for finishing off. In this case I would imagine they will basically have to start again with what is inside.

Condi

18,741 posts

185 months

Friday 30th May
quotequote all
Good video here on the ship, it's class, state of construction, etc. Really interesting. The shipyard which was building it had no experience of building large warships, and more commonly built fishing vessels. Also unusual for them to launch sideways.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCZqPZSx9I4&ab...

Condi

18,741 posts

185 months

Friday 30th May
quotequote all
Popeyed said:
I stood by two ships as Captain built in South Korea. All of the machinery and ancillary equipment was put in on a slipway, the accommodation was pretty much completed too. They were released down the slipway into the water for finishing off. In this case I would imagine they will basically have to start again with what is inside.
Video shows it was much less finished than that, they suspect it was rushed to meet a political deadline, as the other ship of the class was launched in a much more complete state last month, and it's suspected they wanted to show how quickly they could launch a series of ships.