Fire at Old Sarum Historic Hanger
Discussion
Very suspicious circumstances, just after planning permission granted on condition of rebuilding listed hanger.
https://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/25099944.s...
https://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/25099944.s...
Yes - every suspicious.
It seems the Boscombe Down Aviation Collection was not harmed in any way - which is a relief.
Not the first serious hangar fire at Old Sarum either. The hangar being used by Edgley to build their innovative Optica aircraft went up in flames back in 1986. That was suspicious too.
It seems the Boscombe Down Aviation Collection was not harmed in any way - which is a relief.
Not the first serious hangar fire at Old Sarum either. The hangar being used by Edgley to build their innovative Optica aircraft went up in flames back in 1986. That was suspicious too.
'given the green light for a development just one week prior'.
Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Simpo Two said:
'given the green light for a development just one week prior'.
Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Conditions of the planning permission were that they restore the hangar. Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
This is where the fire is in case anyone doesn't know.
https://www.google.com/maps/search/Hanger+1+South,...
https://www.google.com/maps/search/Hanger+1+South,...
miniman said:
Simpo Two said:
'given the green light for a development just one week prior'.
Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Conditions of the planning permission were that they restore the hangar. Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Presumably the fire doesn’t change the conditions of the planning that was granted
And presumably the owners have the building insured
And so surely this is not a problem?
I know it was historic and now it’d be a reproduction, but surely that’s the outcome that’s desired here by the planners?
And presumably the owners have the building insured
And so surely this is not a problem?
I know it was historic and now it’d be a reproduction, but surely that’s the outcome that’s desired here by the planners?
Simpo Two said:
miniman said:
Simpo Two said:
'given the green light for a development just one week prior'.
Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
Conditions of the planning permission were that they restore the hangar. Perhaps the culprit thought that burning it to the ground was cheaper than paying for a demolition team.
Rather silly because if the area was about to be redeveloped anyway, he/they could be facing arson charges. Hopefully CCTV will help solve it.
I feel the same about the scumbag developers who put in an estate and them either refuse to build the promised infrastructure or 'go bust'... surely the council can't be so stupid as to not insist that infrastructure is built first? So it increases the developer's costs, my heart bleeds
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff