China catches own sub in snare net*, crew suffocate

China catches own sub in snare net*, crew suffocate

Author
Discussion

ChemicalChaos

Original Poster:

10,519 posts

167 months

Wednesday 4th October 2023
quotequote all
  • Allegedly.... nothing to see here, according to totally truthful goverment office in Beijing
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12589429/...

Some interesting questions though...
- How does a modern submarine with sonar not see a giant chain net under the sea, even if you weren't expecting it to be there?
- How does running out of air magically get "repaired" some time later to let some crew survive?
- Once caught in a net, surely it can't be as easy as just reversing out of it or they'd be useless.... so how does one escape?

dudleybloke

20,471 posts

193 months

Wednesday 4th October 2023
quotequote all
Tofu dreg navy.

youngsyr

14,742 posts

199 months

Wednesday 4th October 2023
quotequote all
A tragedy for those involved, can't help but feel that in the wider picture it's a case of play stupid games,...

The detail in the intelligence report on it is impressive though, included everything bar what the crew had for breakfast (and I wouldn't be surpised if they knew that too).

MesoForm

9,143 posts

282 months

Wednesday 4th October 2023
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
* Allegedly.... nothing to see here, according to totally truthful goverment office in Beijing

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12589429/...

Some interesting questions though...
- How does a modern submarine with sonar not see a giant chain net under the sea, even if you weren't expecting it to be there?
- How does running out of air magically get "repaired" some time later to let some crew survive?
- Once caught in a net, surely it can't be as easy as just reversing out of it or they'd be useless.... so how does one escape?
Sonar bit - they only listen for stuff as if they sent sound out to see what is outside then other submarines, etc. will be able to hear where they are.

I can't add anything else, it all seems a very odd incident.

Simpo Two

87,030 posts

272 months

Wednesday 4th October 2023
quotequote all
''We have kit which absorbs co2 and generates oxygen in such a situation. It is probable that other nations do not have this kind of tech.'

Apollo 13 could do it.

Why didn't the sub call for help?

Then again, it may all be made up. 'According to a secret UK report'... you may want to rethink that...!

Countdown

41,991 posts

203 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
The article says the Sub was a “nuke” and then refers to “batteries running out “. That doesn’t make sense to me. Also wouldn’t a Chinese sub KNOW where the Chinese sub traps were???

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

205 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
There was gossip going around some of the OSINT channels about this some months back when it was supposed to have happened, it still makes little sense though. A nuclear submarine that runs out of air in a few days?

littlebasher

3,834 posts

178 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
On the other hand, they did prove their nets work

For their own subs anyway.....

youngsyr

14,742 posts

199 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
Well, they name the submarine and the Captain and claim that both are at the bottom of the sea, so should be pretty easy to verify?

Countdown

41,991 posts

203 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
According to Wiki the Type 093 is a nuclear attack submarine (not a diesel-electric) so the comment about batteries running out is baffling.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

205 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
Countdown said:
According to Wiki the Type 093 is a nuclear attack submarine (not a diesel-electric) so the comment about batteries running out is baffling.
"Daily Mail"

No ideas for a name

2,401 posts

93 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
Well, they name the submarine and the Captain and claim that both are at the bottom of the sea, so should be pretty easy to verify?
Report implies it came back up after 6 hours... but that was too late for 55 of the crew.
Daily Mail report so who knows.

Mabbs9

1,247 posts

225 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
Does a nuke sub not also have batteries for any time the reactor is offline? I don't mean to continue normal ops but as a gap fill?

Evanivitch

22,056 posts

129 months

Thursday 5th October 2023
quotequote all
Countdown said:
According to Wiki the Type 093 is a nuclear attack submarine (not a diesel-electric) so the comment about batteries running out is baffling.
Nuclear submarines are still mostly electrically driven. The reactor would likely power batteries for the onboard systems, even if not for propulsion, to improve power conditioning.

Why they didn't have oxygen candles on board is very odd.

Countdown

41,991 posts

203 months

Friday 6th October 2023
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Countdown said:
According to Wiki the Type 093 is a nuclear attack submarine (not a diesel-electric) so the comment about batteries running out is baffling.
Nuclear submarines are still mostly electrically driven. The reactor would likely power batteries for the onboard systems, even if not for propulsion, to improve power conditioning.

Why they didn't have oxygen candles on board is very odd.
But how would the batteries "run out"? The nuclear powerplant would still be generating, providing electric current.......

Evanivitch

22,056 posts

129 months

Friday 6th October 2023
quotequote all
Countdown said:
But how would the batteries "run out"? The nuclear powerplant would still be generating, providing electric current.......
Depends if there's an issue with charging and charge management. Clearly there was a failure that could be fixed, the question is why it was such a catastrophic failure for the crew.