Aircraft range

Author
Discussion

andyA700

Original Poster:

3,296 posts

44 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Just looking at FR, and an Embraer 135 has just landed at Biggin Hill from Newark, New York, which is approx 3,500 miles away. How is that possible, when the range of an E135 is 1750 miles?

Aircraft in question D-AIRG

https://uk.flightaware.com/live/flight/DAIRG

Eric Mc

122,854 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Ferry tanks?

Refuel at Gander/Iceland/Shannon/Prestwick?

RedWhiteMonkey

7,217 posts

189 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
andyA700 said:
Just looking at FR, and an Embraer 135 has just landed at Biggin Hill from Newark, New York, which is approx 3,500 miles away. How is that possible, when the range of an E135 is 1750 miles?

Aircraft in question D-AIRG

https://uk.flightaware.com/live/flight/DAIRG
Flat Earth, wake up sheeple.

RobbyJ

1,634 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
It's a Legacy 650E private jet based on the 135 airframe. More fuel tanks, more range, less useable weight.

Maximum Range
3980 nm
Payload - Full Fuel LBS
1909 lb
Seats (Executive)
13
Long Range Cruise
425 Ktas

trashbat

6,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
It's a 650E and it's got a range of 3,900nm. New York to London is about 3,500nm.

Edit: too slow!

parabolica

6,807 posts

191 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
That's quite an interesting flight history for just the last 2 weeks; looks like it's been all around the world.

peter tdci

1,819 posts

157 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
It's an Embraer Legacy 650E. It has a range of 3,800nm.

https://www.flyvictor.com/en-gb/aircraft-operators...

edit: even slower!

RobbyJ

1,634 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
It's owned by Air Hamburg and charter company with quite a few jets. It's interesting to look at the history of a lot of these jets, like the Vistajet fleet that aren't LADD so you can track their history in FR24.

https://www.faa.gov/pilots/ladd


RobbyJ

1,634 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
trashbat said:
It's a 650E and it's got a range of 3,900nm. New York to London is about 3,500nm.

Edit: too slow!
biggrin

MarkwG

5,093 posts

196 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
parabolica said:
That's quite an interesting flight history for just the last 2 weeks; looks like it's been all around the world.
It's only earning when it's in the air, on the ground it's costing smile

Amateurish

7,901 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
peter tdci said:
It's an Embraer Legacy 650E. It has a range of 3,800nm.

https://www.flyvictor.com/en-gb/aircraft-operators...

edit: even slower!
Isn't it cutting it rather fine to fly 3,500 nm when the range is 3,800?

RobbyJ

1,634 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Amateurish said:
Isn't it cutting it rather fine to fly 3,500 nm when the range is 3,800?
I assume that's the useable range with appropriate reserves but only a guess.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

268 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
RobbyJ said:
Amateurish said:
Isn't it cutting it rather fine to fly 3,500 nm when the range is 3,800?
I assume that's the useable range with appropriate reserves but only a guess.
Also, they probably had a tailwind and weren't committed to continuing all the way to Biggin. They could have stopped at Prestwick if running low.




andyA700

Original Poster:

3,296 posts

44 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Thanks for all the answers, that is an impressive range.

Amateurish

7,901 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
RobbyJ said:
Amateurish said:
Isn't it cutting it rather fine to fly 3,500 nm when the range is 3,800?
I assume that's the useable range with appropriate reserves but only a guess.
Also, they probably had a tailwind and weren't committed to continuing all the way to Biggin. They could have stopped at Prestwick if running low.
That all makes sense. Really interesting, thanks.

Tango13

8,920 posts

183 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
It's got two engines, let's have a discussion about ETOPS...

getmecoat

Sheets Tabuer

19,642 posts

222 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Probably had a few layers of paint scrubbed off, backend of this one was stripped for a repaint when I worked at BH, obviously the rest would have been stripped too.


PurpleTurtle

7,581 posts

151 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Amateurish said:
peter tdci said:
It's an Embraer Legacy 650E. It has a range of 3,800nm.

https://www.flyvictor.com/en-gb/aircraft-operators...

edit: even slower!
Isn't it cutting it rather fine to fly 3,500 nm when the range is 3,800?
They just glide if they run low, yeah? I’ve seen it loads of times on Air Crash Investigations! hehe

MarkwG

5,093 posts

196 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
It's got two engines, let's have a discussion about ETOPS...

getmecoat
Looks like it stayed within 75 mins flight time of land on that route so don't think ETOPS applied smile

Crumpet

4,059 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd February 2023
quotequote all
RobbyJ said:
It's owned by Air Hamburg and charter company with quite a few jets. It's interesting to look at the history of a lot of these jets, like the Vistajet fleet that aren't LADD so you can track their history in FR24.

https://www.faa.gov/pilots/ladd
It certainly keeps it interesting for the crew. It wouldn’t be unusual to circumnavigate the planet in less than a week and then go all the way back around the next - and all to airports you’ve never been to before!