Helicopters and underslung loads
Helicopters and underslung loads
Author
Discussion

DP1

Original Poster:

287 posts

250 months

Friday 2nd August 2019
quotequote all
Hi

Just watching the news about the dam in Derbyshire and looking at the flying being done by the Chinook helicopters. I have some flying experience - Fixed wing PPL - and looking what the pilots were doing did give me a few questions

When you are flying with a load like that, 6 tons or so swinging about, can you feel it when you are manoeuvring - accelerating, slowing, turning etc

When you drop the bags does the helicopter want to go straight up and you have to control it

How does this load affect CofG, do you have to drop the bags in a fixed sequence

Many thanks

Phud

1,476 posts

172 months

Friday 2nd August 2019
quotequote all
yes, is a simple answer to all your questions, the back seat guys, loadies and aircrewmen watch the load, talk to the monkeys and tell the monkeys where to place the aircraft to get the loads in the right place.

All in all the pilots skill and the accuracy of the con are key, there is a movement after you drop a load.

There are different ways to control the load flying and dampen swing and oscillation, worst happens you let it go cheaper than loosing the aircraft and crew.

the pilots have the release button so they compensate for the reaction when they press the button.

ecsrobin

18,641 posts

194 months

Saturday 3rd August 2019
quotequote all
The chinook can lift its own weight near enough:


AW111

9,674 posts

162 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
The chinook can lift its own weight near enough:

Does that imply 1g vertical acceleration (max) when unloaded?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
AW111 said:
Does that imply 1g vertical acceleration (max) when unloaded?
Have you ever seen (felt, heard) a chinook display?

Nimby

5,678 posts

179 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
My former neighbour was an instructor at RAF Odiham, and got me a go on the Chinook simulator at Farnborough. It was remarkably easy to fly in standard config but as soon as they added a swinging underslung load I crashed it every time.

Mr E

23,027 posts

288 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
AW111 said:
ecsrobin said:
The chinook can lift its own weight near enough:

Does that imply 1g vertical acceleration (max) when unloaded?
Wiki reckons approx 10 tons empty, 22 tons max. So no fuel in the one being lifted and not much in the helicopter actually lifting, just about.

Presume the pilot of the second chopper is buying the drinks?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
Mr E said:
Wiki reckons approx 10 tons empty, 22 tons max. So no fuel in the one being lifted and not much in the helicopter actually lifting, just about.

Presume the pilot of the second chopper is buying the drinks?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
Mr E said:
Wiki reckons approx 10 tons empty, 22 tons max. So no fuel in the one being lifted and not much in the helicopter actually lifting, just about.

Presume the pilot of the second chopper is buying the drinks?
No blades, no engines. Probably plenty of other heavy parts removed. I’d doubt that load weighs 4 tons.

Reciprocating mass

6,056 posts

270 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
I did my work experience at raf odiham
In 1990 and was humbled to have been taken up in a Chinook, and we moved a few heavy loads up to greenham common etc
Got to sit by the centre lift hook and dangle my feet whilst watching a Land Rover pirouette around underneath then got to walk down to the rear door on a harness whilst it was down
Very strange standing in the rear opening watching the world fly by cloud9 it is a memory I will never ever forget and it was a shame that my father had to pass away the very same week he was so proud I went up in one,
I found out he passed away in the morning and I had a military police ride home, dad worked shifts and was due home to take me but was late home and was given a lift in by his colleague instead, of course I had no idea what was really happening, they were absolutely gobsmacked when I arrived the next day, I told them my dad was proud I was here
And that I have come back today because it’s what he would of wanted, to this day I struggle to understand how I managed that. I’m not sure I could be that strong again today and every time one of those chinooks fly over my house which they do most days
It all comes flooding back in a good way
It’s almost like a guardian angel lol sounds stupid doesn’t it


Fluid

1,750 posts

214 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
No blades, no engines. Probably plenty of other heavy parts removed. I’d doubt that load weighs 4 tons.
I’d wager the engines are in it.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
Fluid said:
I’d wager the engines are in it.
The engines, in their containers, will weigh well over 400kg each. Obviously I could be very wrong, but that airframe with (maybe) both main gearboxes in, will be close to the maximum load for the Chinook.

Anyone have a source for the story behind the photo?

CanAm

13,871 posts

301 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
Have you ever seen (felt, heard) a chinook display?
Yes, at Wings & Wheels, Dunsfold a few years ago. VERY impressive. A PHer was one of the crew.

Uncle John

5,338 posts

220 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
The chinook can lift its own weight near enough:

Impressive, but what’s with the male inflatable sex doll hanging out the side?

Krikkit

27,933 posts

210 months

Monday 5th August 2019
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
Fluid said:
I’d wager the engines are in it.
The engines, in their containers, will weigh well over 400kg each. Obviously I could be very wrong, but that airframe with (maybe) both main gearboxes in, will be close to the maximum load for the Chinook.

Anyone have a source for the story behind the photo?
It looks like all 4 engines have been dropped off, be surprised if they removed the gearboxes though.

cologne2792

2,151 posts

155 months

Tuesday 6th August 2019
quotequote all
https://youtu.be/UKZrFqv2Ev8?t=206


Near me a few years back...

MartG

22,750 posts

233 months

Tuesday 6th August 2019
quotequote all
Fluid said:
I’d wager the engines are in it.
You can clearly see in the pic that they have been removed

Oilchange

9,685 posts

289 months

Tuesday 6th August 2019
quotequote all
Blades can be packed into boxes and shoved inside the cab. If I remember correctly it was more important to get the blades back first but that might be completely wrong.
Engines have been removed from the slung cab in the pic, obviously, but I can't see if they or the blades are inside.

Numbers are rusty so may misquote but from memory:

Max underslung is 11,340kg based on sling limit. Centre hook can take slightly more though. Max underslung with both front and aft hooks is 10,500kg (eg iso container) Most I ever underslung from the centre hook was about 9,500 kg, a JCB for a short distance.

When flying with USLs the aircraft will be pulled about by a swinging load, spinning or swinging loads can often be settled by slowing or putting a turn in.

There are speed limits depending on the USL type.


Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Tuesday 6th August 2019
quotequote all
Cheers!

DuraAce

4,272 posts

189 months

Tuesday 6th August 2019
quotequote all
Engines are off obviously (they won't be stored inside)
No way will blades be inside either, too much weight (350 ish lbs each)
Front gearbox is still in (the forward rotor head attaches to it and is still there). Impossible to say for the other gearboxes but id guess still fitted as time consuming to remove them.
It'll have no fuel in and as much removed from the cabin as possible (ballistic protection/seats etc)

Lifting aircraft will be low on fuel and minimal kit/personnel inside also.


Edited by DuraAce on Tuesday 6th August 07:14