Sideways takeoff at Sunburgh..
Sideways takeoff at Sunburgh..
Author
Discussion

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,033 posts

229 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
One reason I don't like Sumburgh Airport

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25510819

yikes

Fonz

361 posts

213 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
That looks fun, wink

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Wonder why they didn't turn into it once airborne?

moribund

4,407 posts

243 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Errr... they did?

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Looks like a fairly normal crosswind takeoff to me.

MaxNg

205 posts

228 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I would say it was a very good crosswind take-off, if the wind was indeed gusting to 80mph!

Trickie Dickie

2,399 posts

263 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Crosswind landings are far worse than take offs (IMHO)

On landings, it is really strange to look at the runway approaching in your side window
rather than out off the front windscreen, then you have to turn the aircraft
at the very last second before you hit the ground.
(if you don't turn properly, then the undercarriage can collapse!!!!!)

For the take off you hold the aircraft on the ground until you are at a speed that you are sure it will take off
then ease off the pressure on the control slightly and it will take off (almost on it's own) and "flicks" into the wind
Usually the crosswind actually gives you more lift, but the flick can be startling!!!

HTH

Trickie (PPL only)


mattdaniels

7,362 posts

311 months

Tuesday 31st December 2013
quotequote all
Trickie Dickie said:
On landings, it is really strange to look at the runway approaching in your side window
rather than out off the front windscreen, then you have to turn the aircraft
at the very last second before you hit the ground.
(if you don't turn properly, then the undercarriage can collapse!!!!!)
You don't have to do it that way of course. You could fly wing-down instead and keep the runway dead ahead.

Trickie Dickie

2,399 posts

263 months

Tuesday 31st December 2013
quotequote all
mattdaniels said:
You don't have to do it that way of course. You could fly wing-down instead and keep the runway dead ahead.
Agreed - it is just which one you are taught/prefer

Zeek

882 posts

233 months

Tuesday 31st December 2013
quotequote all
Trickie Dickie said:
Agreed - it is just which one you are taught/prefer
For low mass, I prefer wing down. At least this way you know if the cross-wind is beyond the capabilities of your aircraft before you're being blown sideways off the runway after kicking it straight when crabbing in. Doesn't matter so much in heavy aircraft.

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

213 months

Tuesday 31st December 2013
quotequote all
Zeek said:
For low mass, I prefer wing down. Doesn't matter so much in heavy aircraft.
Erm yes actually it does!

Try landing a C-130 with the 'Crab' technique and you will knock the main gear off if you get it in the slightest bit wrong.

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

213 months

Tuesday 31st December 2013
quotequote all
mattdaniels said:
You don't have to do it that way of course. You could fly wing-down instead and keep the runway dead ahead.
The first time I did that in the HS125 the Standards QFI became rather tense.

You tailor the technique to the a/c!