Air Canada A319 at Heathrow??
Discussion
Eric Mc said:
If a biz jet can cross the Atlantic with ease, there's no reason why these smaller airliners can't.
I'm guessing small airlines like an A319 don't have the range with max passengers/cargo.Or they aren't often equipped with the right length of ETOPS endurance.
Or passengers just want something bigger when crossing an ocean

creampuff said:
I'm guessing small airlines like an A319 don't have the range with max passengers/cargo.
Or they aren't often equipped with the right length of ETOPS endurance.
Or passengers just want something bigger when crossing an ocean
The A£19/320s don't have the range (inc reserve for stacking) to go from LHR to JFK in one hop. BA fly London City, refuel at Shannon and then on to JFK and I can see that the Air Canada flight would go LHR - Gander - Toronto / Montreal. BA's lfight is 100% business classOr they aren't often equipped with the right length of ETOPS endurance.
Or passengers just want something bigger when crossing an ocean

While BA are refuelling the Self Loading Frieght do US immigration at Shannon, saving them hours at JFK. This is all aimed at cutting down the centre to centre journey time and is effective apparently.
Collectingbrass said:
creampuff said:
I'm guessing small airlines like an A319 don't have the range with max passengers/cargo.
Or they aren't often equipped with the right length of ETOPS endurance.
Or passengers just want something bigger when crossing an ocean
The A£19/320s don't have the range (inc reserve for stacking) to go from LHR to JFK in one hop. BA fly London City, refuel at Shannon and then on to JFK and I can see that the Air Canada flight would go LHR - Gander - Toronto / Montreal. BA's lfight is 100% business classOr they aren't often equipped with the right length of ETOPS endurance.
Or passengers just want something bigger when crossing an ocean

While BA are refuelling the Self Loading Frieght do US immigration at Shannon, saving them hours at JFK. This is all aimed at cutting down the centre to centre journey time and is effective apparently.
Collectingbrass said:
The A£19/320s don't have the range (inc reserve for stacking) to go from LHR to JFK in one hop. BA fly London City, refuel at Shannon and then on to JFK and I can see that the Air Canada flight would go LHR - Gander - Toronto / Montreal. BA's lfight is 100% business class
While BA are refuelling the Self Loading Frieght do US immigration at Shannon, saving them hours at JFK. This is all aimed at cutting down the centre to centre journey time and is effective apparently.
I thought that the take-off weight of the BA A318 is limited by the short runway at LCY and that's why it isn't able to carry enough fuel for the whole trip to JFK.While BA are refuelling the Self Loading Frieght do US immigration at Shannon, saving them hours at JFK. This is all aimed at cutting down the centre to centre journey time and is effective apparently.
Mister V said:
peter tdci said:
I thought that the take-off weight of the BA A318 is limited by the short runway at LCY and that's why it isn't able to carry enough fuel for the whole trip to JFK.
That's what i thought. Don't they do the return trip non stop? Turbodiesel1690 said:
Came in on the red eye from Belfast this morning, could have swore I saw an A319 in Air Canada livery sitting at T1, can someone confirm if I was dozing/dreaming?!
I fly Halifax to Heathrow on Air Canada a week next Wednesday. 23:45, get in about 9am local time. No idea what type plane though. Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



