Crap telly- "Monster Moves - Spectacular Spitfire"
Crap telly- "Monster Moves - Spectacular Spitfire"
Author
Discussion

yellowjack

Original Poster:

18,408 posts

195 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
Nothing else on, thought it would kill some time. Channel 5, by the way.

The show was stuffed full of woeful graphics as 'filler', and seemed more concerned with shipping containers than classic fighters. Shockingly inaccurate and dumbed down to the point of melting my mind, I spat out my tea when the narrator mentioned that the American collector buying and shipping the Spitfire out to the US already owned a "rare World War One Tiger Moth".

Worse was to come, in the form of a graphic depicting a Spitfire spinning toward the vast expanses of the Atlantic Ocean, as the narrator explained that it was a short range fighter with a fuel capacity of 85 gallons. FFS, could you not just have told us that flying it over the Ocean was not possible due to the limited range of the aeroplane? Did I really need a CGI animation of a 'plane splashing into the Ocean to understand the consequences?

Suffice to say, I turned it off seconds later. I'd almost rather watch Big Brother. Almost.

gimmeshelter

100 posts

209 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
It was a crap programme about an interesting subject.

I got the feeling it was an English version of an American programme with an English presenter reading the original script.

There was something said about the Spitfire being designed by a team of engineers, no mention of RJ Mitchell.

Also, they said "The Spitfire was powered by the Rolls Royce Packard Merlin engine." Obviously trying to give their country a bit of credit.

Everything the team did was billed as potentialy a disaster to try and make it all dramatic.
I did notice he already had a Spitfire in the hanger with his "Rare WW1 Tiger Moth".

Simpo Two

92,670 posts

294 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
Seeing as it was a programme about moving things, and not about Spitfires, I thought it was fine. The graphics were a bit silly but harmless. There was plenty of input from the technicians.

Would have liked to have seen more of the first flight though.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
Sounds like I should be relieved to have missed it.

It does annoy me though that it takes almost as little care to get the basic facts right as it does to get them wrong. So why do they get them SO wrong. That takes effort.

S3_Graham

12,835 posts

228 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Seeing as it was a programme about moving things, and not about Spitfires, I thought it was fine. The graphics were a bit silly but harmless. There was plenty of input from the technicians.

Would have liked to have seen more of the first flight though.
I found the program ok as light sunday afternoon tv.

Cardinal sin must be putting one of their stupid songs on whenever the engine was running so you didnt get to hear the bloody aircraft!