General Belgrano 1982
Author
Discussion

T66ORA

Original Poster:

3,474 posts

286 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2012
quotequote all
30 years ago today the, some say, controversial sinking of the Argie Cruiser by HM S/M Conqueror started, IMO, the realization that the British ment business in there quest to retake the Falkland Islands.I thought that we would all go down there, rattle a few sabres, and return safely home with out any blood spilt! Spare a though for ALL the service personnel (including a couple of my ex-shipmates/friends...HMS Ardent) who gave there lives in 1982.
These Islands must remain British, until the Falkland Islanders themselves decide otherwise.

Lets use this thread to discuss any of the key events from the conflict on its 30th anniversary.

Ex Stoker, D175***K, HMS Hermes,HMS Tiger Bay/Stena Inspector and HMS Ilustrious.

Edited by T66ORA on Monday 19th November 19:18

steve j

3,223 posts

257 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
T66ORA said:
30 years ago today the, some say, controversial sinking of the Argie Cruiser by HM S/M Conqueror started, IMO, the realization that the British ment business in there quest to retake the Falkland Islands.I thought that we would all go down there, rattle a few sabres, and return safely home with out any blood spilt! Spare a though for ALL the service personnel (including a couple of my ex-shipmates/friends...HMS Ardent) who gave there lives in 1982.
These Islands must remain British, until the Falkland Islanders themselves decide otherwise.

Lets use this thread to discuss any of the key events from the conflict on its 30th anniversary.

Ex Stoker, D175312K, HMS Hermes,HMS Tiger Bay/Stena Inspector and HMS Ilustrious.
clap That cruiser was a threat even if it was in port, the Argentine carrier should have been sent to the bottom too, I agree that the Islands must remain British.

Tango13

10,047 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
I've read a few books on the sinking of the Belgrano and I don't see what the problem is/was. The ship was a threat that needed to be removed and it was.

The problem I have is the way the politicians and to an extent Whitehall meddled with the way Admiral Woodward wanted to run the war. He wanted total control of the three SSN's but Northwood retained control which allowed the Argentine carrier to escape.

daz3210

5,000 posts

269 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
At the end of the day it was a war. And it was a war that we did not start.

So why should the Argies complain that we attacked a WARship. Had it been a ferry, or cruise ship I may feel different.

But I would say I feel sorry for those who lost their lives, and the loved ones they left behind, regardless of what side they were on.

Sheets Tabuer

21,384 posts

244 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
I can't get my head around what the people who whinge about it are moaning for, do they think while we were fighting the argies the belgrano was taking time out for a pleasure cruise?

Turbodiesel1690

1,958 posts

199 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
Big boys games, big boys rules, they started it, we finished it

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
It seemed astonishing to me too. If you are at war, and if you can destroy an enemy asset easily, then do so. Otherwise not only is it a strategic threat to your own plans but if it then kills 1,000 of your own side you'll feel a bit silly.

I think it was mainly Thatcher-bashing from her opponents and various anti-war types.

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
Turbodiesel1690 said:
Big boys games, big boys rules, they started it, we finished it
Nuff said. Couldn't have put it better myself.

Can you even begin to imagine the ramifications had we not sunk the Belgrano & it had sunk more of our ships? Maggie & the top brass would have been hung out to dry by the media & the two faced fools in the Houses of Parliament had she stood up & said 'we didn't sink it because it was going the other way so we thought we should leave it alone..........'

We did what we had to do - no doubt the Argies would have done exactly the same as we did had the tables been turned.

We were at war with the Argies hence what was done was done to protect our armed forces. End of story.

daz3210

5,000 posts

269 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this event also send the Argie Navy running for port, not to reappear until after the conflict was over?

Thus it made our job somewhat easier.

onyx39

11,349 posts

179 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
daz3210 said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this event also send the Argie Navy running for port, not to reappear until after the conflict was over?

Thus it made our job somewhat easier.
Indeed. Interesting article here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2080490/Be...

phumy

5,827 posts

266 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
T66ORA said:
Ex Stoker, D175312K, HMS Hermes,HMS Tiger Bay/Stena Inspector and HMS Ilustrious.
Sprog.......Ex Stoker, D122997E HMS Llandaff, HMS Eskimo, HMS Hermes (5EStbd) wink sorry

Hooli

32,278 posts

229 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
phumy said:
5EStbd
Sounds like a BMW

T66ORA

Original Poster:

3,474 posts

286 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
phumy said:
Sprog.......Ex Stoker, D122997E HMS Llandaff, HMS Eskimo, HMS Hermes (5EStbd) wink sorry
hehe Sorry Salts biggrin
I take it you has left by 82 old timer? Missed yer tot and hammocks biggrin

OllieC

3,816 posts

243 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
my apologies if any find this to be in bad taste, but it amuses me :

Mt grandad was in the RAF at the time of the Falklands (although not involved in any way) he made us all laugh with this whispered forces 'joke' :

"Pssst, *I* know why they sank the belgrano ... it was full of Argies "

The joke of course is not at the expense of the unfortuate Argentinians on board, rather the hand wringers at home.

T66ORA

Original Poster:

3,474 posts

286 months

Thursday 3rd May 2012
quotequote all
MAY 3rd 1982

News filters in of further action off the Falklands, Lynx Helicoptors from HM Ships Glasgow and Coventry attack Argie Gun Boats using the, then new, Sea Skua anti ship missles Sinking one vessel and damaging another as the second missle glances the bridge. Approximately 17 Argentine sailors killed.

Sandy Woodwood cancels the night time bombardment by HM Ships Antrim and Yarmouth, following the Mirage attack on HM Ships Arrow Alacrity and Glamorgan "on the gun line" on the evening of May 1st, Glamorgan suffering minor damage from a near miss of a 500 pounder.

Hermes continues exercising with Broadsword the term "Goalkeeper" starts, the Type 22s with Sea Wolf are never more than a few yards away.(most of the time) wink

phumy

5,827 posts

266 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
T66ORA said:
phumy said:
Sprog.......Ex Stoker, D122997E HMS Llandaff, HMS Eskimo, HMS Hermes (5EStbd) wink sorry
hehe Sorry Salts biggrin
I take it you has left by 82 old timer? Missed yer tot and hammocks biggrin
LOL....At least i saw a tot and a hammock and a real true RN uniform hehe unlike the Burtons style single crease trousers that was introduced later, maybe in your time, the bullst and bks that naturally came with "big ships" turned me against staying "in".

T66ORA

Original Poster:

3,474 posts

286 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
phumy said:
LOL....At least i saw a tot and a hammock and a real true RN uniform hehe unlike the Burtons style single crease trousers that was introduced later, maybe in your time, the bullst and bks that naturally came with "big ships" turned me against staying "in".
Yep they changed over around 77 wasn`t it? I was 5 Oceans rating to short for 7 seas biggrin The new uniform was a lot easier to Rig though.

T66ORA

Original Poster:

3,474 posts

286 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
MAY 4th 1982

The day started with the second Vulcan strike of the conflict, at around 4.30am Stanley air field was bombed, unfortunatly no hits were registered.

A few hours later the task force lost its first Sea Harrier, 3 planes attacked the airfield at Goose Green, one was shot down by AA fire, the Pilot was killed.

The day was to get much worse. The 3 Type 42s Coventry, Glasgow and Sheffield were on routine Picket duty to the west of the task force, there Sea Dart missles systems were the long range defence of the fleet.
Two Super Etendards, both armed with one AM39 (airbourne version) Exocet missles attacked the task force at sea skimming altitude, they popped briefly up,so the missles internal radar could lock on to there targets. Glasgow was the only ship to pick up any sort of signal, the Sheffield was caught knapping, the ship was apparently using SCOT at the precise moment of the incoming Exocet, the crew were not even closed up (Action stations) The first missle hit Starboard side amidships
but thankfully failed to explode,saving many lives. The resulting fire and smoke crippled the ship, loss of fire main pressure hindered the crews efforts to extinguish the fires. 20 men lost there lives.
The second missle missed any target due to the amount of Chaff sent up by Task Force ships. HMS Yarmouth reported seeing the missle ditch into the sea.

In the aftermath it became apparent that the normal working dress (called number 8s) were a contributing factor to some horrendous burns due to there nylon content.
Most stokers i knew just wore overalls for most of the campaign from then on.

If the Task Force never thought they were in for a fight before, they did now!



Edited by T66ORA on Friday 4th May 19:36

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Friday 4th May 2012
quotequote all
IIRC this all happened because there was no AWACS?

steve j

3,223 posts

257 months

Saturday 5th May 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
IIRC this all happened because there was no AWACS?
A fleet carrier with AEW capability was sorely needed, alas Ark Royal had gone with no real replacement, I`m sure the meddling politicians saw to that !!