Ice Pilots
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,653 posts

294 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
OK, I can't resist it any longer.

Why are these guys using 1930/40 relics and not something more modern? Is it simply cost?

It seems a tribute to the engineering of the time.

I particularly like the C46; it's 90% DC-3 and 10% Stratocruiser: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss-Wright_C-46_C...

I'm confused about the Electra. I thought it was a twin favoured by 30's derring-do types, Cotten et al, but suddenly it's completely different and four engined... and now these guys come to England and buy a wreck wth no engines...?

thehappyotter

800 posts

231 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
They made two Electra's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Model_10_Ele...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_L-188_Electr...

The L-188 used to be a regular sight over Coventry when I was last there back in '04. Atlantic Airlines had a fleet based there, not sure if they still do with the drama at Cov over the past few years.

davidjpowell

18,689 posts

213 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Oddly the one they bought had 4 engines...

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
OK, I can't resist it any longer.

Why are these guys using 1930/40 relics and not something more modern? Is it simply cost?
If you want to land on a rough field, it's best to do it in a plane designed to land in a rough field. Those old planes were built very strongly, and designed to last.