Just arrived

Author
Discussion

BRGS

Original Poster:

33 posts

231 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all


very pleased with this and i wanted to share!


BigWithey

565 posts

237 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
yes .. yes

CmdrBond

709 posts

206 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
Very nice, looks much better without the Cyclops IMHO

Asterix

24,438 posts

235 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
CmdrBond said:
Very nice, looks much better without the Cyclops IMHO
Agreed - I still require the date so went for the SD

okgo

39,356 posts

205 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Love them, thinking about picking one up myself smile

petermansell

868 posts

213 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
v nice smile

BRGS

Original Poster:

33 posts

231 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Well i thought of the SD but it is a lot bulkier and now I have the sub it is a nice size, no problem getting a cuff over it and no-one noticing your watch, my Fortis and TAG are much bigger and the sub is a nice change. Also i didn't want the cyclops.

tuscan_al

4,107 posts

221 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Nice, but arent all SD &SM COSC and say so on the face??

Family Guy

802 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Very nice thumbup

BRGS

Original Poster:

33 posts

231 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
No my understanding is that M serial 14060 sub is COSC but the others are not, however it is the same movement as in COSC watches from Rolex just not COSC, makes the face neater.