Why are watches so big now?

Why are watches so big now?

Author
Discussion

torres del paine

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

228 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Just curious, some are so ridiculously big you need ape's wrists to carry them off.

I see lots of guys with massive watches which totally overwhelm the wrist. It's only fat/rugger types who can carry them off.


anonymous-user

61 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Great thread. I was thinking this too. I've got big wrists and for me a 41mm case is about the max i'd go for.

I regularly see pictures on timezone on the IWC forum of people wearing 40-41mm watches where the lugs overhang the wrist. They look like they're wearing a clock on their arm or a child with an adults watch.

The iwc 3717 is a big old watch which to me can look daft on small wrists


and some doppels, They're not for girls.



On the other hand I find some watches too small with about 38-39mm being the min I'd go for depending on the case design.

Please note that none of these pictures are mine. There are loads more on Timezone. The Panerai and IWC big pilot ones are often the same with thin wrists and huge watches but the owners seem to love them.


Edited by stovey on Monday 30th July 14:34

Pesty

42,655 posts

263 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Not sure why they are so big but I do like them.

My latest is 42mm and I love it because it feels like im carrying a solid lump of iron around.

I agree though that people with skinny wrists just dont suit bigger watches.

ps since watches are getting bigger I cant wear any of my smaller ones, they just feel daft on now

Edited by Pesty on Monday 30th July 14:35

filaborg

261 posts

213 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Had a Breitling Super Avenger some time ago, that was 47 mm i believe. Sold it in the end as i looked like Flava Flav... ridiculously big.

Moose.

5,342 posts

248 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
I've got very skinny wrists but love big watches biggrin Current one is 45mm lug to lug and I don't think it looks silly. If I had the money, I'd have a yellow Emergency smile

SpydieNut

5,833 posts

230 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
would you think i was being cynical if i suggested the watch makers are catering for a new market - as people (generally) get larger.

dawson2k5

244 posts

209 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
my current wrist wear is 38mm and looks quite small, i can't wait to try the breitling 6.75.

Andy_CTR

2,090 posts

238 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
I love it!!

Being 6'6" I need a decent size watch, as otherwise it looks like I'm wearing a lady's one!

I've got a 45.5mm Planet Ocean and it fits me perfectly!! smile

torres del paine

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

228 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
Andy_CTR said:
I love it!!

Being 6'6" I need a decent size watch, as otherwise it looks like I'm wearing a lady's one!

I've got a 45.5mm Planet Ocean and it fits me perfectly!! smile
You're the kind of guy that fits these watches! Good on you!

I'm slim and have fairly slim wrists, so many watches that have caught my eye have been too big for me, at least I've felt uncomfortable wearing them. I don't like anything bigger than about 40mm. My current knockabout watch is a mid-size Seiko Divers Automatic (AKA Black Boy in Japan) and is a shade under 40mm. It's just right; chunky, good looking, reliable and affordable and it fits me perfectly without looking too big or too small.

I'm also after a trekking watch (altimeter/barometer) and have been looking at the Casio ProTrek range and they are massive - about the size of a carriage clock. I understand that they pack a lot of technology into these watches but I think out in the hills it would bug me being so big. I think I shall try the Suunto watches instead.

RickH

1,638 posts

255 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
Does the same approach apply to the thickness of the watch? I've currently got a standard high-street Seiko Titanium which is about 40mm lug-lug. But the thickness is only about 10mm, and being Titanium it's nice and light.

I'm looking to upgrade to an Omega Speedie and I noticed it was only a couple of mill wider but wuite a bit thicker (14.5mm I think - almost 50%).

You then look like you're wearing the proverbial brick on your wrist, but it's not necessarily the width of the watch that's the problem.

RickH

smartie

2,607 posts

280 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
torres del paine said:
I'm also after a trekking watch (altimeter/barometer) and have been looking at the Casio ProTrek range and they are massive - about the size of a carriage clock. I understand that they pack a lot of technology into these watches but I think out in the hills it would bug me being so big. I think I shall try the Suunto watches instead.
Have a look at the Tissot ones (T Touch), not too big and available with a leather strap which always seems to suit skinny wrists better.

CY88

2,808 posts

237 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
Larger men can get away with wearing larger watches....

That doens't mean small men should wear small ones though .... theres a small guy in my office who wears a ladies size watch, and it just looks daft.

My Tag Monaco (the square shaped one)is only 37mm wide but, having just measured, its 50mm diagonally from the point of each corner of the square face to the opposite one.