Help me make the right choice. Rolex v AP v JLC?
Help me make the right choice. Rolex v AP v JLC?
Author
Discussion

Speed.deman

Original Poster:

232 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 04 August 2017 at 16:19

lostkiwi

4,585 posts

154 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
For me it would be the JLC all day long.

CardShark

4,262 posts

209 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Speed.deman said:
Am I being foolish in choosing the AP which is £1,100 more and 11 years older?

My preference is the AP, which is a watch I have worn in the past. I am just concerning I'm spending my money foolishly given the other two are younger and cheaper?
I don't follow the prices of such models however if the AP is your first choice and the £ is right in relation to its age, condition, full set (or not) and, importantly, service history then just go for it! AP is the bigger name of the 3 so the fact that it's more expensive shouldn't be an issue, it's whether the price is right with respect to that watch that matters.

Do check the service history though, that's not going to be cheap to send back to AP.




Edited by CardShark on Thursday 9th March 13:06

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

261 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
AP for me, I have a thing about the date position on the JLC which would annoy the hell out of me smile

TheOversteerLever

1,357 posts

243 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
lostkiwi said:
For me it would be the JLC all day long.
Me too. Not a fan of the Datejust and the AP looks a bit 'used car dealer' for my taste.

I very nearly bought a Master Chrono before I got my ceramic Sub LV. Still want one!

davek_964

11,319 posts

205 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
I think you should buy whichever you like most that's in budget - which seems to be the AP.

I saw the first two pics and thought : You have excellent taste. I've always liked the Rolex Datejust, especially in that colour. The JLC also looks lovely to me and I'd be happy with either. For me, the AP is a completely different looking watch to the other two and a bit "bling" for my tastes but if you love it, then buy it! smile

Sir Lord Poopie

212 posts

120 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Would have to be for the Rolex but the hands let it down slightly. AP looks like a ladies watch. JLC looks too big, again I don't like the hands (at all).

BrabusMog

21,801 posts

216 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
AP for me!

13m

28,176 posts

252 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Speed.deman said:
Hi all

Pictures below.

It has come down to 3 x watches. They are all used watches but in mint condition.

1. 2015 Datejust in steel with blue face and baton (116334) - £5,500

2. 2016 JLC Master Chronograph in steel - £5,500

3. 2005 AP Royal Oak Bi Metal - £6,600

My budget was £5,500 max but I saw this AP and negotiated like mad to get this price.

Am I being foolish in choosing the AP which is £1,100 more and 11 years older?

My preference is the AP, which is a watch I have worn in the past. I am just concerning I'm spending my money foolishly given the other two are younger and cheaper?

Thank you all.




If it has to be one of those, the Rolex. The JLC is too big for you and the RO is just horrific in any incarnation, particularly that one.

A standard Datejust would suit you better.


lostkiwi

4,585 posts

154 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
TheOversteerLever said:
lostkiwi said:
For me it would be the JLC all day long.
Me too. Not a fan of the Datejust and the AP looks a bit 'used car dealer' for my taste.

I very nearly bought a Master Chrono before I got my ceramic Sub LV. Still want one!
Pretty much my thoughts too.

All are great watches but for me Rolex is the default choice for someone who has come into money so its a bit 'BMW' to me - great product but shows little imagination (apologies to Rolex fans). You'll also be asked 'Is it real' and people will assume its not....
The JLC is nicely understated, can be worn for all occasions and superbly elegant.
The AP is as said just too bling for my tastes but then I don't like gold or two tone watches much.

Whats important is what you like. What I've said are just my opinions and many will not agree. Buy what you like. All are great products.

Wills2

29,757 posts

205 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
I like the JLC it can't be that big only a 40mm case, looks lovely I could live with the dodgy date position.


toon10

7,143 posts

187 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
lostkiwi said:
For me it would be the JLC all day long.
Very much this for me too. I really don't like Rolex design other than the sub and I'm liking the AP even less from an aesthetic point of view. The JLC is beautiful. As watches, they're all superb though.

dimots

3,241 posts

120 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Rolex is the best design but the other two offer more bang for your buck. Tough call. I'd go Rolex, it's a classic.

poocherama

396 posts

239 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Will this be your only watch?

I've got both the DJ (36mm) and the JLC. A word of warning about the JLC, it's terribly fragile, I had a nightmare with mine when I first bought it and as a result rarely wear it, lovely looking watch though. I bought a Daytona to replace it as I'm a fan of chronographs, it feels bomb proof by comparison.

The rolex is much better as an everyday proposition. The AP in bi metal doesn't do it for me but to each his own.

As an aside I paid £5250 for the JLC 3 years ago. The rolex is probably a much better place to put your money if you worry about that sort of thing.

Edited by poocherama on Thursday 9th March 15:42

kmpowell

3,549 posts

258 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
I have the 116334 in that exact dial combination. I love it. No other watch I own get's so many "ooooh that's nice" comments.

The colour isn't common, so it really does feel special when i put it on. It can be worn with any colour jacket or shirt. I wear it for very smart/formal.

It has the classic datejust shape and the 41mm means it's not too chunky or big on the wrist.

I wouldn't however say the JLC is an alternative to the Rolex, it's a different style all together, so it would be another watch to have along side for different formal options when a leather/chrono/classic look is required.



Edited by kmpowell on Thursday 9th March 16:18

GCH

4,141 posts

232 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
JLC

tuffer

9,012 posts

297 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Out of those 3 it would have to be the JLC, looks stunning.

Shaoxter

4,614 posts

154 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
JLC for me too, seems like a majority decision.
Therefore I predict the OP will go ahead and get the blingy AP anyway hehe

audidoody

8,598 posts

286 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
No to the AP

Mixed gold and s/s is just a bit outre

As an owner of two S/S Rollies - I vote JLC

Zingari

947 posts

203 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
AP looks like it came out of the 80s. Rolex are like a nose - everyone has got one and usually buy one to get it noticed. JLC looks quality.