2012 Chrysler 300
Discussion
I was not a big fan of these before; however, this newer version appeals more to me. Over all though, the Buick LaCrosse is tops in this class IMO.
http://www.chrysler.com/hostc/vsmc/vehicleSpecMode...
http://www.buick.com/lacrosse-luxury-sedan.html
http://www.chrysler.com/hostc/vsmc/vehicleSpecMode...
http://www.buick.com/lacrosse-luxury-sedan.html
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 30th March 19:19
I love the older Chrysler 300C with it's imposing front styling.
Predictably Fiat softened it and made it look a bit ghey in the latest incarnation.
They're robust cars, RWD, evolved multi link ex Mercedes platform, finely honed, robust Hemi engine. Not alot goes wrong with them.
I can't take Buicks too seriously. I regurly rent new cars and when I rented a Buick Lucerne- with it's 'high value' transverse V6 - I just felt under whelmed and could imagine that car degenerating into a russty appliance in a few years.
Predictably Fiat softened it and made it look a bit ghey in the latest incarnation.
They're robust cars, RWD, evolved multi link ex Mercedes platform, finely honed, robust Hemi engine. Not alot goes wrong with them.
I can't take Buicks too seriously. I regurly rent new cars and when I rented a Buick Lucerne- with it's 'high value' transverse V6 - I just felt under whelmed and could imagine that car degenerating into a russty appliance in a few years.
Marquis Rex said:
I love the older Chrysler 300C with it's imposing front styling.
Predictably Fiat softened it and made it look a bit ghey in the latest incarnation.
They're robust cars, RWD, evolved multi link ex Mercedes platform, finely honed, robust Hemi engine. Not alot goes wrong with them.
I can't take Buicks too seriously. I regurly rent new cars and when I rented a Buick Lucerne- with it's 'high value' transverse V6 - I just felt under whelmed and could imagine that car degenerating into a russty appliance in a few years.
Try a 2012 non-rental model. They have overtaken some German and Jap usual suspects in JD Power ratings. Predictably Fiat softened it and made it look a bit ghey in the latest incarnation.
They're robust cars, RWD, evolved multi link ex Mercedes platform, finely honed, robust Hemi engine. Not alot goes wrong with them.
I can't take Buicks too seriously. I regurly rent new cars and when I rented a Buick Lucerne- with it's 'high value' transverse V6 - I just felt under whelmed and could imagine that car degenerating into a russty appliance in a few years.
black1 said:
i test drove one of the first 300 a few years ago, i had a s type jag at that time
and all i can say about it is crap, the ride was naff the interior was cheap n tackey
yes it looks great but thats all !
anyone tried the 2012 ?
Why are you doing a 'top gear' and comparing it with the Jag - which is alot more expensive.and all i can say about it is crap, the ride was naff the interior was cheap n tackey
yes it looks great but thats all !
anyone tried the 2012 ?
It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
Marquis Rex said:
Why are you doing a 'top gear' and comparing it with the Jag - which is alot more expensive.
It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
is the jag not a ford then ?It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
black1 said:
Marquis Rex said:
Why are you doing a 'top gear' and comparing it with the Jag - which is alot more expensive.
It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
is the jag not a ford then ?It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 6th April 23:37
Jimbeaux said:
black1 said:
Marquis Rex said:
Why are you doing a 'top gear' and comparing it with the Jag - which is alot more expensive.
It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
is the jag not a ford then ?It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 6th April 23:37
i was out your way a few weeks ago i should have had a test drive
black1 said:
Jimbeaux said:
black1 said:
Marquis Rex said:
Why are you doing a 'top gear' and comparing it with the Jag - which is alot more expensive.
It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
is the jag not a ford then ?It's about as ridiculous as when Clarkson compared a Dodge Ram with an Ariel Atom
You should really be comparing it to something of similar price- such as a Ford Mondeo or Big plasticy Honda Legend or something.
Before you think I'm biased against the Jag- I was involved in it's design and development.
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 6th April 23:37
i was out your way a few weeks ago i should have had a test drive
Jimbeaux said:
chryslerben said:
Just got our first one in the showroom today, got to say its really nice inside interior trim game has been stepped up by chrysler. Outside is striking as ever.
8 Speed autobox and 31 MPG?Perhaps it apppeals to the Mr Gears who get excited about small engines!
300C SRT-8 with all the options tips the scales at $54,000 + the usual tax, tag, title.
Sounds like a substantial sum, but when you sit it next to it's European competition it looks OK - if you factor out the terrifying depreciation. In a year's time the same car will be around $30-35K and then it'll be an absolute steal.
Sounds like a substantial sum, but when you sit it next to it's European competition it looks OK - if you factor out the terrifying depreciation. In a year's time the same car will be around $30-35K and then it'll be an absolute steal.
Marquis Rex said:
Jimbeaux said:
chryslerben said:
Just got our first one in the showroom today, got to say its really nice inside interior trim game has been stepped up by chrysler. Outside is striking as ever.
8 Speed autobox and 31 MPG?Perhaps it apppeals to the Mr Gears who get excited about small engines!
Gassing Station | Yank Motors | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff