Renesis engined NC MX5

Author
Discussion

snotrag

Original Poster:

14,831 posts

217 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
Worth a read.

Look how it drops in! That chassis was made for a Rotary engine. Sort it out Mazda!

http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=158121

Edited by snotrag on Tuesday 2nd March 12:58

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
I've seen an RX8 engine in a Mk3 MX5 before (there is one in this country) but I've never seen anyone "engineer" a transplant quite that extensively! What would I give to have him as a neighbour!!!!! laugh

hornetrider

63,161 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Holy moley! yikes

inman999

27,881 posts

179 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Car Porn . . . I love it.

Shame its not finished yet and no new posts this year.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
The only other thing is all that money spent - and yet none to match the front bumper. Still, amazing achievement.

juansolo

3,012 posts

284 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
I can't help but feel it would have been easier to strip and cage up an RX8 if you're going to make it a coupe...

cyberface

12,214 posts

263 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
285 width R888s on the rear? That's going to need one hell of an engine to justify that much grip! Mental rotate

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
cyberface said:
285 width R888s on the rear? That's going to need one hell of an engine to justify that much grip! Mental rotate
A supercharged Renesis engine probably fits the bill adequately wink

Taffer

2,177 posts

203 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Worth a read.

Look how it drops in! That chassis was made for a Rotary engine. Sort it out Mazda!

http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=158121

Edited by snotrag on Tuesday 2nd March 12:58
Nice, but I still prefer this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7TUVjfcb0&fea...

No replacement for displacement!



Edited by Taffer on Wednesday 3rd March 21:59

cyberface

12,214 posts

263 months

Thursday 4th March 2010
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
cyberface said:
285 width R888s on the rear? That's going to need one hell of an engine to justify that much grip! Mental rotate
A supercharged Renesis engine probably fits the bill adequately wink
That's what you'd bung on the back of a tuned Porker GT2. Can you get 600-odd bhp from a supercharged rotary? Those engines are 238 bhp base aren't they?

I *love* the idea of an 'extended' Mazda rotary with 4 rotors, and maybe a supercharger... would be crazy, sound awesome, and would probably put out a lot of power. It'd probably drink petrol like my sensible family saloon too nuts

NDNDNDND

2,171 posts

189 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the NC chassis was basically a cut-down RX-8 - hence the trailing arm rear suspension... Some of the mounting points (look at the diff comparisons) do look extremely similar!

Funnily enough, I always though Mazda should've made a SWB RX-8 turbo... looks like this guy's got the right idea!

franv8

2,212 posts

244 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Trailing arms - you're joking! Disappointed at that - I'm afraid that to me makes it sound like the Mk3 has moved away from the original (rather pure) concept.