What ride Height
Discussion
I'm thinking I need to increase the ride height of my car.
I had the local garage fit the Gaz kit from MX5parts a few months ago. And after I set the shocks settings correctly it's great handling.
However I cant get over the local speed bumps now without grounding out. Currently it's running 32cm (wheel center to to of wheelarch) all around.
Any suggestions for something a bit higher? Do I go for another 2cm? 5?
Originally it was on the 4x4 suspention frankly for road use I'd be happy to put it back there (or just a tad lower) if anybody knows what that was?
Cheers
I had the local garage fit the Gaz kit from MX5parts a few months ago. And after I set the shocks settings correctly it's great handling.
However I cant get over the local speed bumps now without grounding out. Currently it's running 32cm (wheel center to to of wheelarch) all around.
Any suggestions for something a bit higher? Do I go for another 2cm? 5?
Originally it was on the 4x4 suspention frankly for road use I'd be happy to put it back there (or just a tad lower) if anybody knows what that was?
Cheers
After fitting the Gaz kit, Tiny at WiM set my ride height at 13" / 33cm front and 13.5" / 34.3cm rear. I'm getting on well with it. It's still a bit higher than some of the others I see about. But it does now look a lot better than the previous 4x4 settings it had when I purchased it!
When talking to Tony about ride height I explained that I wanted 'handling' and that 'ride height' would be a result of that - I've heard that plenty of others go for ride height first and accept the handling compromises this can bring - each to their own I guess.
My understanding is that optimal handling is achieved when the wishbones are parallel with the ground - sounds great hey, but please don't ask me anything more as I'm repeating what I was told by an expert and have zero knowledge to discuss this sort of thing in more detail!
Anyway, HTH
When talking to Tony about ride height I explained that I wanted 'handling' and that 'ride height' would be a result of that - I've heard that plenty of others go for ride height first and accept the handling compromises this can bring - each to their own I guess.
My understanding is that optimal handling is achieved when the wishbones are parallel with the ground - sounds great hey, but please don't ask me anything more as I'm repeating what I was told by an expert and have zero knowledge to discuss this sort of thing in more detail!
Anyway, HTH
matt uk said:
After fitting the Gaz kit, Tiny at WiM set my ride height at 13" / 33cm front and 13.5" / 34.3cm rear. I'm getting on well with it. It's still a bit higher than some of the others I see about. But it does now look a lot better than the previous 4x4 settings it had when I purchased it!
When talking to Tony about ride height I explained that I wanted 'handling' and that 'ride height' would be a result of that - I've heard that plenty of others go for ride height first and accept the handling compromises this can bring - each to their own I guess.
My understanding is that optimal handling is achieved when the wishbones are parallel with the ground - sounds great hey, but please don't ask me anything more as I'm repeating what I was told by an expert and have zero knowledge to discuss this sort of thing in more detail!
Anyway, HTH
That does help a lot. If Tony is setting higher to get best handling I'm really happy. Because I need to go that way! I'll try out his heights this weekend unless it rains on me.... When talking to Tony about ride height I explained that I wanted 'handling' and that 'ride height' would be a result of that - I've heard that plenty of others go for ride height first and accept the handling compromises this can bring - each to their own I guess.
My understanding is that optimal handling is achieved when the wishbones are parallel with the ground - sounds great hey, but please don't ask me anything more as I'm repeating what I was told by an expert and have zero knowledge to discuss this sort of thing in more detail!
Anyway, HTH
Mine used to be very low and I do mean very. It looked great but it didn't only ground out on speed bumps but also on the road if it had a bit of a crown to it. It was very good at cleaning road kill off the road!
I have since raised it up to F32.5 R330 and it's spot on. Tony at WiM commented that the wishbones were in the perfect positions and that it allowed him to set the geometry perfectly. I can confirm that the handling is now great on the track where before it always felt just a little bit skitish.
I have since raised it up to F32.5 R330 and it's spot on. Tony at WiM commented that the wishbones were in the perfect positions and that it allowed him to set the geometry perfectly. I can confirm that the handling is now great on the track where before it always felt just a little bit skitish.
Actually I wont be raising it. Because I can't. Physically I'm unable to move the washer up the screw thread. The tool supplied has however taken of a lot of the paint on the washer.
Now is the washer a single item? It looks like two. But I cant even get the lower one to back away from the top one. I can move them both up a few mm turing the top one though....
Gerrr.
Now is the washer a single item? It looks like two. But I cant even get the lower one to back away from the top one. I can move them both up a few mm turing the top one though....
Gerrr.
MX-5 Lazza said:
Sounds like you need a pair of C spanners to unlock them. When you re-tighten just pinch the lower one up, it doesn't need to be tight. Also put a bit of copper grease between them to stop them binding together.
I only seem to have one.... I'll have a scratch around. Or otherwise a trip to www.topgearautomotive.co.uk who are based in town might be the lazy man answer. Munter said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
Sounds like you need a pair of C spanners to unlock them. When you re-tighten just pinch the lower one up, it doesn't need to be tight. Also put a bit of copper grease between them to stop them binding together.
I only seem to have one.... I'll have a scratch around. Or otherwise a trip to www.topgearautomotive.co.uk who are based in town might be the lazy man answer. Top Gear boys are great, I work with them on TVR and Lotus and they will help you if you get stuck.
I have been having a play recently to see what heights on my test mule work on general use without spoiling handling and between 12.5" to 13" on the front and 13" to 13.5" does not ruin handling but on the lower settings you may have to take bigger speed bumps at an angle
Ab Shocks said:
Munter said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
Sounds like you need a pair of C spanners to unlock them. When you re-tighten just pinch the lower one up, it doesn't need to be tight. Also put a bit of copper grease between them to stop them binding together.
I only seem to have one.... I'll have a scratch around. Or otherwise a trip to www.topgearautomotive.co.uk who are based in town might be the lazy man answer. Top Gear boys are great, I work with them on TVR and Lotus and they will help you if you get stuck.
I have been having a play recently to see what heights on my test mule work on general use without spoiling handling and between 12.5" to 13" on the front and 13" to 13.5" does not ruin handling but on the lower settings you may have to take bigger speed bumps at an angle
Right well the guys at Top Gear have taken some of my earth pounds and done the job for me.
I can actually go over speed bumps again!
I even interupted their lunch to collect it and they didn't bh too much And it's definately worth being there early. Ummm TVR being started in an enclosed space....
I can actually go over speed bumps again!
I even interupted their lunch to collect it and they didn't bh too much And it's definately worth being there early. Ummm TVR being started in an enclosed space....
Gassing Station | Mazda MX5/Roadster/Miata | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff