How much is too much for a CAT D repaired MX-5?
Discussion
I was just wondering what sort of price you think is acceptable to pay for a 2004 Mazda MX-5 1.6 that has been repaired after previously being a CAT D needing panel / bodywork repairs.
Mileage is 110K. Rust Free
Any input is welcome!
Thanks
Mileage is 110K. Rust Free
Any input is welcome!
Thanks
Edited by Eldog on Monday 20th February 10:22
Trabi601 said:
I wouldn't bother - the Mk2 1.6 is far too underpowered to be worth buying, especially as a CatD.
Thanks, I was thinking it may be okay to drive round for a daily for a little while then sell on and break even / maybe profit slightly if I can get it from a friend for let's say £250-300?Eldog said:
Trabi601 said:
I wouldn't bother - the Mk2 1.6 is far too underpowered to be worth buying, especially as a CatD.
Thanks, I was thinking it may be okay to drive round for a daily for a little while then sell on and break even / maybe profit slightly if I can get it from a friend for let's say £250-300?MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
Trabi601 said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
Trabi601 said:
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.
But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
Actually the 1.6 in the Mk2 is a very good pairing. But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
MX-5 Lazza said:
I guess you haven't driven one then. The 1.6 is basically the same engine as in the early Mk1 and is a more eager feeling engine than the 1.8 which feels torquier but not really that much quicker. There isn't really a lot in it and for a 1.8 to lose a 1.6 it has to be driven very hard.
- shrugs*
Trabi601 said:
- shrugs*
Trabi601 said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.Gassing Station | Mazda MX5/Roadster/Miata | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff