air temp sensor vs air mass sensor

air temp sensor vs air mass sensor

Author
Discussion

madmanstiff

Original Poster:

7 posts

128 months

Sunday 2nd March 2014
quotequote all
I currently own the 1.6 miata and I've been toying with the idea of modifying the engine. Inlet and exhaust for the time being as I will be building a separate engine for use later obviously an on going project due to cost. One thing I had mentioned to me was that the air mass sensor could be swapped for an air temperature sensor. I'm wondering if there is any truth in this and if so a how to would be handy and the would allow me to remove the excessively long and windy induction pipes.
Cheers for your help.

DVandrews

1,324 posts

289 months

Sunday 2nd March 2014
quotequote all
I doubt it, they have very different functions and responses.

Dave

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

225 months

Sunday 2nd March 2014
quotequote all
Not on the standard ECU. If you use a standalone programmable ECU you can use a MAP sensor and air temp sensor instead of the AFM.

CaptiV8ted

819 posts

217 months

Sunday 2nd March 2014
quotequote all
That's a big no no. Air temp sensors use a completely different algorithm than a flap type flow meter (well, that's what Megasquirt tells me!)

The problem with MX5s is that they're not very tuneable by traditional methods. Even with a throttle body setup and after market ECU you won't see much over 130hp on a 1.6. Not a huge gain for a lot of outlay. That's why most people go forced induction.

This is available...

http://www.moss-europe.co.uk/Shop/ViewProducts.asp...

... it moves the airflow meter to the front of the engine with a direct air feed. Expensive though.

Even cams and head work aren't particularly effective. Go forced induction!

madmanstiff

Original Poster:

7 posts

128 months

Sunday 2nd March 2014
quotequote all
Forced induction is going to be the end result hopefully but that will be after the second engine is built as I would rather have peice of mind. I don't want to risk blowing the engine and taking the turbo with it. So for now it is naturally aspirated mods preferably ones that can be carried over to the turbo.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

225 months

Monday 3rd March 2014
quotequote all
Unless there is a problem with your engine or you are planning to go over about 260bhp/lb ft then you don't need to build a new engine. MX5s have a very strong engine and can cope with a lot of abuse.

Richyvrlimited

1,837 posts

169 months

Monday 3rd March 2014
quotequote all
CaptiV8ted said:
The problem with MX5s is that they're not very tuneable by traditional methods. Even with a throttle body setup and after market ECU you won't see much over 130hp on a 1.6.
Not strictly true anymore. BLiNK are doing some n/a packages which are very impressive. 130bhp from a 1.6 on a Dynapaq (equates to more like 165bhp on a 'normal' dyno).

http://www.mx5nutz.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1...