Would the 4dr M3 tempt you instead of the coupe?

Would the 4dr M3 tempt you instead of the coupe?

Author
Discussion

tali1

Original Poster:

5,270 posts

207 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Given that its cheaper and more exclusive with with only 400 to UK as opposed to the 1700 coupes - would the 4dr tempt you instead of the coupe?

french

520 posts

206 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
If you like the car why not just make sure it cheap as chips as the prices for the coupes are tumbling lately.

belleair302

6,908 posts

213 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Yes. Four doors are handy, I think the car looks in proportion and the performance is not significantly different. I also think it looks more like a Q car.

croyde

23,739 posts

236 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
I drove the 4 door a couple of days ago and although I like the more sporting look of the coupe, the extra doors and amazing amount of rear leg room would be very useful, as I have 3 kids, plus once you are in the driving seat there is no difference that I can tell.

It does look like any other BMW 3 to the uninitiated so you could have some fun there.

So why is the saloon £1500 cheaper than the coupe? I would have thought that the extra doors would cost more. Are there other differences?

Edited by croyde on Saturday 5th April 07:43

Neil.D

2,878 posts

212 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
The only other M3 to have 4 doors was the E36. Although they made fewer it was none more desirable, even more so now.
This could be down to the fact that the E36 M3 received a very luke warm reception - bearing in mind its heritage was the E30 - the sort of (unjustified) welcome the current M3 has also received.

rn1988

4 posts

202 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
they did actually do an e46 m3 4 door but only on the continent,the 4 door in my opinion is the one to go for but they may also be doing a touring which would be good,i work for bmw and get the see the new models alot earlier than most people including the new x6 which is also going to be a big seller i reckon,twin turbo v8 with the turbos mounted near the top of the engine side by side(sorry bit off topic)

Huliganov

319 posts

201 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
croyde said:
I drove the 4 door a couple of days ago and although I like the more sporting look of the coupe, the extra doors and amazing amount of rear leg room would be very useful, as I have 3 kids, plus once you are in the driving seat there is no difference that I can tell.

It does look like any other BMW 3 to the uninitiated so you could have some fun there.

So why is the saloon £1500 cheaper than the coupe? I would have thought that the extra doors would cost more. Are there other differences?

Edited by croyde on Saturday 5th April 07:43
Less desirable, not as good looking, not as much of a 'sports car' coupe. Basically it's about image and depreciation, which the saloon will do alot quicker than the coupe.

darronwall

1,730 posts

202 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
better car ...a lot stiffer and rarer a little less boyracer therefor ,if you can find one,it will be a better car and more practical too.When launched all the roadtesters found it to be the better driving car

Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
History tells us M3 saloon value's sink faster than Miss surrey in a swimming pool.

The estate however, now thats interesting yes

Pugsey

5,813 posts

220 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Vixpy1 said:
History tells us M3 saloon value's sink faster than Miss surrey in a swimming pool.

The estate however, now thats interesting yes
Absolutely! My M3 went last week and I miss it hugely but have a Touring coming. Better looking than Coupe or Saloon IMHO. smile Oh, and if there's no carbon roof I'll be able to have it in mean and moody black too - which I couldn't do with my coupe as it seemed a shame to loose the effect of the carbon roof.

John D.

18,394 posts

215 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Oooh...did'nt realise they were doing a touring too cool Nice. The M5 touring is uber-cool.

kusee pee

1,021 posts

209 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
As the owner of that much-maligned M3, the E36 Evo Saloon, I would definitely prefer the saloon. I prefer the looks and the sleuth element to it. And it gives me the chance to imagine I'm Andy Priaulx. Which I'm not BTW.

GT Chipper

1,358 posts

223 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Does anyone know when the M3 touring will be available ?

rassi

2,475 posts

257 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
rn1988 said:
they did actually do an e46 m3 4 door but only on the continent
The E46 M3 was only available as a 2 door (Coupe or Convertible).

The E90 or E91 M3 have a bit of "mini M5" about them + added stealth which IMO makes them more interesting.

raysingh

1,113 posts

245 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
rassi said:
rn1988 said:
they did actually do an e46 m3 4 door but only on the continent
The E46 M3 was only available as a 2 door (Coupe or Convertible).

The E90 or E91 M3 have a bit of "mini M5" about them + added stealth which IMO makes them more interesting.
This was the raison d'etre for the e36 M3 4-door - as there was no M5 avaiable at the time.

I went E30>E28 M5>E36 M3 Saloon.
_Really_ wish I'd kept my E36 M3 (& the E30 M3!).

Then again I'm not exactly a youngster so my image needs no assuaging, and I like the incognito look & so called "exclusive M3 Saloon" adverts - but they get a kicking for used prices.

The E90 coupe looks fabulous compared to the saloon, & E46 - so you may want to be wary if depreciation is an issue.

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

262 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
i saw one yesterday in the M1 and it did look good! if only the fuel economy wasn't so bad!

KENZ

1,229 posts

199 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
No carbon roof on the saloon

croyde

23,739 posts

236 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
Ahhhh! that's why it's £1500 cheaper, perhaps?