Carbon fibre Pipercross indution kit?

Carbon fibre Pipercross indution kit?

Author
Discussion

alz

Original Poster:

376 posts

207 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
Anyone got one of these fitted. I just purchased an E46M3 and was looking on demon tweeks when I came accross the induction kit. It is pricey at nearly £900 though. The car I have has the CSL alloys, boot and bonnet and I was looking to upgrade the car slightly further.
If anyone has had it done, is it worth it?
Thanks in advance.

Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
I think i'd probably rather go with the Gruppe M one.

E36GUY

5,906 posts

224 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
DaveF kit available from www.e36coupe.com. He does a variant for the e46 as well. Brilliant stuff. Big K&N filter is what is used but the main thing is the hand-made heatshield. Having something in Carbon fibre does nothing for performance, it's just expensive.


Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.

ASBO

26,140 posts

220 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?

Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.

gavm5

186 posts

212 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.

E36GUY

5,906 posts

224 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
gavm5 said:
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.
Well that's the fist time I have heard that and I know that 00s of people have the DaveF kit on their BMWs. The kit has been dynoed (lots of times) with results worth between 12-15bhp on an M3 evo and I've never heard any problems associated with it. I've been running mine a year and all is well.


zmrjason

230 posts

204 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
I will have my 8month old Simota for sale within the next 2 weeks if its of interest, probably circa £125.


Edited by zmrjason on Monday 17th March 14:47

Chessers

745 posts

218 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
I could well be interested in that Jason. Can you confirm it fits on an E46 M3?

Cheers



Ayrton4ever

73 posts

202 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
E36GUY said:
gavm5 said:
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.
Well that's the fist time I have heard that and I know that 00s of people have the DaveF kit on their BMWs. The kit has been dynoed (lots of times) with results worth between 12-15bhp on an M3 evo and I've never heard any problems associated with it. I've been running mine a year and all is well.
K&N claim 18.63HP@7400RPM which sounds very high... http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=...
On the oil mist damage I would have thought K&N would have done their testing on such a key issue?? is it cases of misuse sticking the filter str8 on after oiling up before letting it dry or whatever the instruction is??? confused

zmrjason

230 posts

204 months

Monday 17th March 2008
quotequote all
Chessers,
Not sure if it fits an E46 M3. However Vixpy will know if you ask him!?
Jason

Chessers

745 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
Vixpy - I hear you are the man.

Do you know if Jasons Simota induction kit will fit straight to an 04 E46 M3?

Will PM you as well.

Cheers for the help on this.

Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
hehe

I'm afraid i'm honestly not sure, assuming the kit is orig off a Z3M.

Chessers

745 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
ha ha - I teed you up there!

I'll have a check about and see what's what.

biggrin


french

520 posts

206 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
E36GUY said:
gavm5 said:
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.
Well that's the fist time I have heard that and I know that 00s of people have the DaveF kit on their BMWs. The kit has been dynoed (lots of times) with results worth between 12-15bhp on an M3 evo and I've never heard any problems associated with it. I've been running mine a year and all is well.
Bit of a long read but quite interesting

http://www.bmwe34.net/e34main/upgrade/Air_filter.h...

ASBO

26,140 posts

220 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
french said:
E36GUY said:
gavm5 said:
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.
Well that's the fist time I have heard that and I know that 00s of people have the DaveF kit on their BMWs. The kit has been dynoed (lots of times) with results worth between 12-15bhp on an M3 evo and I've never heard any problems associated with it. I've been running mine a year and all is well.
Bit of a long read but quite interesting

http://www.bmwe34.net/e34main/upgrade/Air_filter.h...
My God french, that's not like you to provide something constructive wink

<thud>

I've read various reports on the effectiveness or otherwise of cotton filters. I have to say though that the report is hardly ground breaking. Does it not stand to reason that a filter that lets in more air will let in more dust?

My research into this topic has been quite substantial. I started out quite sceptical - especially so, when I read reports that a simple cone filter attached to some fairly clumsy looking pipe can release up to 15bhp, but countless dyno tests over on http://www.e36coupe.com have all showed the same thing.

And heres why:

The airbox - and therefore the inlet diameter, used in the E36 M3 is exactly the same size as that used in the E36 320 and all other 6 cylinder models. The chap who engineered the DaveF kit is an ex race engineer. He concluded that for what ever reason - most likely to be packaging, the airbox on the M3 was/is incredibly restrictive. The net effect of opening the inlet further allows more air in.

Now I don't doubt there is a correlation between knackered MAF's and aftermarket induction kits, but frankly, when the gains are so great, I don't much care! I change the oil every 3000 miles or so and should the time come that the MAF needs to be replaced then so be it. I'll perhaps keep an eye on the condition of the inlet tract, but I shouldn't think that my filter is letting in much more than the standard filter would as I don't happen to live in a dessert...

Vixpy1

42,664 posts

270 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
I have no argument with the gains claimed, I'm sceptical natually, because i have not personally done a before and after the kit. But don't wish to debunk other peoples findings.

I also have no problem with aftermarket filters, they are usefull (though i personally believe no more that an uprated panel filter will do for most purposes)

My problem is oiled filters, there is no need for the filter to be oiled. And having seen VW's and BMW's running 14:1 Afr's with buggered MAF's, (which is not ideal), it is a problem. It rarely brings up an error code on many cars, its just lucky the ecu's pull timing to conpensate for the lean running. Because most people don't realise until they have a wide band stuck up the exhuast.

french

520 posts

206 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
gavm5 said:
Vixpy1 said:
ASBO said:
Vixpy1 said:
Nice way to kill your Air flow meter that.
What with a K & N?
yes I dislike them intensely. 50/50 chance any car that comes through my place with a K&N filter will have a fecked MAF.
Not worth the money for little or no gain just noise and an "ooh" when you open the bonnet.

The oil on a K&N mists over the MAF which inturn burns the MAF out as these get hot, so you end up with incorrect readings given to the computor and can end up with low power, wrecked MAF's and engine management lights on.

Not recommended in my opinion.
I think your right,not really worth the ££'s for the results you end up with.

I am thinking about fitting a the diff from a E46 M3 but I'm not sure whether I will have to cahnge the D\shafrt flanges or the prop flange, it seems to be the same casing?

This IMO is the most cost effective bang for your buck .

Pro's faster acceleration & mid range pick up

Con's lower top speed , higher revs (not to much) when cruising & ofcourse worse Mpg .

Two of the con's dont bother me at all ie Top speed it will still get about 140-145mph where can you go this fast let alone 155mph, Mpg i dont use every day so no problem , the higher RPm may be a pain though , depends what it would be at around 70 - 80mph .