E92 Depreciation - Yes really!

E92 Depreciation - Yes really!

Author
Discussion

Pugsey

Original Poster:

5,813 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.

Marki

15,763 posts

276 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
hehe

GregE240

10,857 posts

273 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Pugsey said:
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.
Hmm, your coffee you mentioned in the other thread clearly did the job mate!

kayc

4,492 posts

227 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Pugsey said:
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.
The main reason people keep harping on about depreciation on the M3 is because the car itself was expected to be a major step forward from the old m3 and at £60K has to be fairly special.It was eagerly awaited,supposed to be as rare as rocking-horse shit,and capable of blowing 997's and rs4's into the weeds..in fact it looks less aggressive/worse looking than the old m3 and and looks poorly made(paintwork is shocking)and extremely easy to get hold of.Frankly a poor effort from BMW which is a shame because im a big fan of BMW and had lots of them in the past.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Sorry, but this is another price bleat. It costs £50k, not £60k. It has come out ahead of the rS4 in just about every test. It is £20k less than a 911, as quick and better equipped.

You are another who wanted to pay E46 money for a 911/RS4 competitor.

The car is far from perfect (too heavy, dull colours) and doesn't excite me sufficiently, but it is a strong RS4/911 competitor and well priced for that role.

Did anyone seriously expect to be able to sell to a dealer at list?

Donut

4,521 posts

257 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Good post Zod!

nice echo toobiggrin

nutcase

1,145 posts

258 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Does anyone want to do a straight swap with their E92 for my six year old 75k mile E46, maybe with cash my way???















(throws fuel on the fire)

Pugsey

Original Poster:

5,813 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
GregE240 said:
Pugsey said:
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.
Hmm, your coffee you mentioned in the other thread clearly did the job mate!
Yeah - wound up, need to calm down so what do my two remaining brain cells tell me to do? Three cups of expresso - doh!! wobble

Pugsey

Original Poster:

5,813 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
kayc said:
Pugsey said:
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.
The main reason people keep harping on about depreciation on the M3 is because the car itself was expected to be a major step forward from the old m3 and at £60K has to be fairly special.It was eagerly awaited,supposed to be as rare as rocking-horse shit,and capable of blowing 997's and rs4's into the weeds..in fact it looks less aggressive/worse looking than the old m3 and and looks poorly made(paintwork is shocking)and extremely easy to get hold of.Frankly a poor effort from BMW which is a shame because im a big fan of BMW and had lots of them in the past.
Classic kayc post just like the ones I remember from your Porsche days! Packed full of facts - sadly none of them relating to the M3 as far as I can see!wink







I'll give you the paint thing actually - it's crap!

Edited by Pugsey on Tuesday 20th November 13:21

bher

786 posts

276 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Just to say that I remain very very interested by buying a E92 M3.
Hope that price is high enough so it won't be the car of everyone (just kidding)I SAID KIDDING
K.I.D.D.I.N.G.

Could someone elaborate about paintwork quality.

kayc

4,492 posts

227 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Pugsey said:
kayc said:
Pugsey said:
NEWS FLASH. The new M3 is a car. Therefore it will depreciate. If this is news to you please don't feel the need to share your profound discovery. It's only been out a couple of months - don't you want to know/discuss how it handles, brakes etc etc. No? Well send your contributions to What Car or similar then. furious

Sorry - rant over.

Pugs.
The main reason people keep harping on about depreciation on the M3 is because the car itself was expected to be a major step forward from the old m3 and at £60K has to be fairly special.It was eagerly awaited,supposed to be as rare as rocking-horse shit,and capable of blowing 997's and rs4's into the weeds..in fact it looks less aggressive/worse looking than the old m3 and and looks poorly made(paintwork is shocking)and extremely easy to get hold of.Frankly a poor effort from BMW which is a shame because im a big fan of BMW and had lots of them in the past.
Classic kayc post just like the ones I remember from your Porsche days! Packed full of facts - sadly none of them relating to the M3 as far as I can see!wink







I'll give you the paint thing actually - it's crap!

Edited by Pugsey on Tuesday 20th November 13:21
I know..i actually like the new M3 a lot but i did think the finish was poor...plus they have used a lot of weight saving materials already so im not sure where they can lose weight for the csl when it comes out!

paoloh

8,617 posts

210 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Lets start with price. A decent spec new one is easily £58k, £50 buys you a shell!
The car isn't as good as it could have been, for example HUD ( head up display ), you can even order it in an X5, why not in M3?
The reason the price has tumbled is because BMW in their wisdom flood the market. Withold supply and prices stay high.
You can order a new one for delivery in Jan/Feb 08.....

Pugsey

Original Poster:

5,813 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
paoloh said:
Lets start with price. A decent spec new one is easily £58k, £50 buys you a shell!
The car isn't as good as it could have been, for example HUD ( head up display ), you can even order it in an X5, why not in M3?
The reason the price has tumbled is because BMW in their wisdom flood the market. Withold supply and prices stay high.
You can order a new one for delivery in Jan/Feb 08.....
You didn't read my OP did you.wink

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

204 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Im taking it £60k is with the options you MUST have in the M3?
If so then the 997 Carrera 2 is £3k cheaper and the Carrera 2S is only £5k more.

Now which is more special a M3 or a Porche?? To me the porche as it is a highly desirable car that is not easily affordable to most people (well I say that I mean they cannot justify spening so much more on a car over another which does the job perfectly well).

Speculating on cars hell why not some make some £ some dont & some lose its the capitalist way.

However having said that knowing the terrible losses those who bought the M3 CSL's and knowing the fact that the Audi R8 is super desirable and already had a 2 year waitiing list common knowledge vs the M3 E92 which I certainly hadnt heard had waiting lists. I'd personally take the hit on the deposit lose the £2k and be done with it put it down to an error of judgement.

For those who have bought it who cares how much it has lost your running a car that you supposedly love remember it could be written off tomorrow or stolen (and recovered) then youd be losing a huge amount on its value. Spending £60k on a cardictates that you must be able to afford significant running costs and high depreciation & unlike the Dragons den lot who dont own their cars they lease them (new ones anyway not the classics) so they know from the start what the car will cost them

Sorry for ranting but its time to end the endless "ohh you bought an M3 and you lost lots of £" and the other side "its a great car you cannot afford such a car stop trolling". Come on lets talk about what the car is like what are its best bits where is it poor (ignore the financials) and what options are a must? And how it compares against the old E46.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Im taking it £60k is with the options you MUST have in the M3?
If so then the 997 Carrera 2 is £3k cheaper and the Carrera 2S is only £5k more.
er, add the options to the Porsches and the gap widens very quickly. Very quickly indeed.

Donut

4,521 posts

257 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
Welshbeef said:
Im taking it £60k is with the options you MUST have in the M3?
If so then the 997 Carrera 2 is £3k cheaper and the Carrera 2S is only £5k more.
er, add the options to the Porsches and the gap widens very quickly. Very quickly indeed.
Zod please stop making factual statements..

this is the internet!!

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Donut said:
Good post Zod!

nice echo toobiggrin
What echo might that be? whistle

Pugsey

Original Poster:

5,813 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
Welshbeef said:
Im taking it £60k is with the options you MUST have in the M3?
If so then the 997 Carrera 2 is £3k cheaper and the Carrera 2S is only £5k more.
er, add the options to the Porsches and the gap widens very quickly. Very quickly indeed.
Indeed, indeed! My well (but not over) spec'd M3 was £56.5K. My early 997S to similar spec but in reality with far fewer of the new gizmos & goodies that now come with the M3 as standard was £69k - and that was three years or more ago...........

laingy

676 posts

247 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
I think its great that people buy cars and expect them not to depreciate, and then you end up with lots of posts about 'wow never expected my xxx to fall in value so much'.

All cars are mass produced they are not in short supply, so why wont they fall in price? Bascially 40-50% fall over three years is what everyone should hope for so on a 60K m3 - about 8k a year (more in year 1 and 2).

paoloh

8,617 posts

210 months

Tuesday 20th November 2007
quotequote all
Pugsey said:
paoloh said:
Lets start with price. A decent spec new one is easily £58k, £50 buys you a shell!
The car isn't as good as it could have been, for example HUD ( head up display ), you can even order it in an X5, why not in M3?
The reason the price has tumbled is because BMW in their wisdom flood the market. Withold supply and prices stay high.
You can order a new one for delivery in Jan/Feb 08.....
You didn't read my OP did you.wink
Yes and did your not notice the lack of moaning in my reply?
Pure statement of facts.