New M3 - emerging spec details

New M3 - emerging spec details

Author
Discussion

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
BMW were due to reveal more info today and it looks like a few bits have already leaked out. Importantly the engine specs. Seems like the new V8 is 15kg lighter than the previous S54 six in the E46 M3.

www.motorauthority.com/cars/bmw/bmw%e2%80%99s-new-v8-engine-for-the-m3/






Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 22 March 08:24

RichardD

3,607 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
DoctorD said:
...Seems like the new V8 is 15kg lighter than the previous S54 six in the E46 M3.
...
Is this down to the new unit being all alloy and the old one being an iron block (to make it smaller/stronger or something like that) ?

daveco

4,201 posts

213 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
So if the engine is lighter and the roof is now carbon how is this car going to be heavier than the E46 M3?

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
Out of interest;

- the 997 GT3 engine develops 305Kw and 405Nm from 3600cc
- this new M3 V8 engine develops 309Kw and 400Nm from 3999cc

Interesting eh? Key information we need to hear is how much the whole car weighs. Bear in mind the 997 GT3 has weighed in at 1460-1470kg, if the E92 M3 weighs in at 100kg more then that gives us 'some' idea of performance.




Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 22 March 10:37

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all








Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 22 March 10:55

RichardD

3,607 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
DoctorD said:
... Key information we need to hear is how much the whole car weighs. Bear in mind the 997 GT3 has weighed in at 1460-1470kg, if the E92 M3 weighs in at 100kg more then that gives us 'some' idea of performance.
How about gear ratios, and time to shift, as not wasting say 0.7 sec changing gears each time helps accleration times (works for the F430 and M5!)

With enough numbers I can feed it into

www.cartestsoftware.com/cartest2000/index.html nerd !

Oh, as a wild guess am estimating a top speed of 186mph derestricted) hehe.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
DoctorD said:


M5 V10 for comparison:


DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
No gear ratios yet. There is a press conference in Munich later this afternoon so more information perhaps then.

A few more factoids;

This new S65 V8 engine has a 12:1 compression ratio (same as the 997 GT3). BMW claim it to be the lightest V8 engine on the market and it is some 40kg lighter than the last V8 engine built by M GmbH as fitted in the E39 M5.

vixpy1

42,658 posts

270 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
DoctorD said:


M5 V10 for comparison:





Wibble

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
English version of the press release just now available.

Only clue I could find about the absolute weight of the M3 read as follows:

"In its specific output, the eight-cylinder easily exceeds the benchmark of 100 hp per litre acknowledged as the standard for a particularly sporting and dynamic power unit. But even so, power is not everything. Instead, the dy-namic experience offered by a car is borne out in particular by its acceleration and performance in gear at all speeds resulting also from the weight of the vehicle and the sheer thrust and muscle of the engine"

And..

"High speed, low weight.
The fact remains that more power alone – that is higher torque – is not
sufficient to be a winner. And so the BMW M3 outperforms competitors focusing on the torque concept alone, wherever those models require a massively reinforced and, accordingly, heavy drivetrain to convey their extremely high level of torque, since this extra weight and mass must first be accelerated and propelled to a higher speed. The high engine speed
concept, on the other hand, enables the engineer to opt for a much lighter drivetrain and choose a far shorter transmission ratio"

I guess they wouldn't be saying this if they had something to hide.


Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 22 March 14:17

daveco

4,201 posts

213 months

Top pup

312 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
Impressive power and weight figures, but i expected BMW to squeeze a little more torque out of it.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
Top pup said:
Impressive power and weight figures, but i expected BMW to squeeze a little more torque out of it.

You are missing the point of M Power engines then. The concept is of a lightweight engine and transmission operating at high rpm. Power is a function of torque and rpm and the M Power model is to get power by revving the engine, like Ferrari, like Porsche, like (at a far more extreme level) an F1 car.

Top pup

312 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd March 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
Top pup said:
Impressive power and weight figures, but i expected BMW to squeeze a little more torque out of it.

You are missing the point of M Power engines then. The concept is of a lightweight engine and transmission operating at high rpm. Power is a function of torque and rpm and the M Power model is to get power by revving the engine, like Ferrari, like Porsche, like (at a far more extreme level) an F1 car.


I realise the concept of M Power engines, i simply expected it to produce in excess of 100Nm per litre.


Edited by Top pup on Thursday 22 March 23:14

stuh

2,557 posts

279 months

Friday 23rd March 2007
quotequote all

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd March 2007
quotequote all
Top pup said:
Zod said:
Top pup said:
Impressive power and weight figures, but i expected BMW to squeeze a little more torque out of it.

You are missing the point of M Power engines then. The concept is of a lightweight engine and transmission operating at high rpm. Power is a function of torque and rpm and the M Power model is to get power by revving the engine, like Ferrari, like Porsche, like (at a far more extreme level) an F1 car.


I realise the concept of M Power engines, i simply expected it to produce in excess of 100Nm per litre.


Edited by Top pup on Thursday 22 March 23:14

It's just about bang on 100 Nm, just like the M5, whcih is what I expected.

edb49

1,652 posts

211 months

Friday 23rd March 2007
quotequote all
As a comparison, the 330i coupe weighs 1545kg (EU) with a 161kg engine. The M3 engine adds 40kg, which would take the weight to 1585kg.

Other things that would affect the weight:

+ M Diff
+ SMG
- Carbon roof

Anything else to add to this list?

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Sunday 25th March 2007
quotequote all
edb49 said:
As a comparison, the 330i coupe weighs 1545kg (EU) with a 161kg engine. The M3 engine adds 40kg, which would take the weight to 1585kg.

Other things that would affect the weight:

+ M Diff
+ SMG
- Carbon roof

Anything else to add to this list?

SMG adds verylittle weight. The gearbox itself is probably heavier with an extra ratio and beefed-up components though.