E39 M5 to E60 M5?

E39 M5 to E60 M5?

Author
Discussion

Levinson

Original Poster:

21 posts

214 months

Thursday 22nd February 2007
quotequote all
I have a 2001 M5 and really like it however the newer shape has grown on me and iam considering moving to one.

But...would it really be worth paying another £35k just to drive the newer model,is it really that much better?

Opinions welcome.

dazren

22,612 posts

268 months

Thursday 22nd February 2007
quotequote all
I've got an E39 and regularly drive my brother's E60. The only thing stopping me definitely getting an E60 in the future is the small petrol tank. Fantastic car otherwise. As for the £35k cost to switch being worth it or not that obviously depends on financial circumstances.

Suggest you test drive one ASAP.



Edited by dazren on Thursday 22 February 18:49

derestrictor

18,764 posts

268 months

Thursday 22nd February 2007
quotequote all
Is it better?

Did the boy J Paul (Il Popus Maximus) windsurf orf the craggy Sardinian coast?




The Philanthropist of Wessex continually bangs on about the risible range of the new car but he has yet to drive it anywhere other than the Black Forest.

shout Diplomatic immunity!

dazren

22,612 posts

268 months

Thursday 22nd February 2007
quotequote all
We had an E39 v E60 M5 thread a while ago which may be of interest:

www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=289394&f=181&h=0

dazren

22,612 posts

268 months

Thursday 22nd February 2007
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
Diplomatic immunity!

Closest we'll get to immunity is cloned plates. Might I suggest something registerred to the American Embassy, following their approach to the congestion charge (ie bog off Ken it's a tax, we're not paying). I can't imagine they'll be too helpful to the busybody scum.

Ashok

607 posts

266 months

Friday 23rd February 2007
quotequote all
I've had both and they're completely different animals. Think of the E39 as a charging rhino - all visceral and raw with lots of torque. The E60 by contrast is like the starship enterprise - high tech and slow to get going but once you floor it... whoosh! If you want an E60 more akin to the E39 consider an Alpina B5.

Zod

35,295 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd February 2007
quotequote all
Ashok said:
I've had both and they're completely different animals. Think of the E39 as a charging rhino - all visceral and raw with lots of torque. The E60 by contrast is like the starship enterprise - high tech and slow to get going but once you floor it... whoosh! If you want an E60 more akin to the E39 consider an Alpina B5.

DOn't agree at all, Ashok. The E60 is ot slow to get going. It's quicker to every increment than the E39. The B5 is a fast, but dull car.

The E60 M5 is continentally fast. I did 2500 km on the continent last week and its Autobahn performance was simply astounding. Very few cars on the road could touch it. The way it can accelerate from 80 to 140 mph is mind-blowing.

Ashok

607 posts

266 months

Saturday 24th February 2007
quotequote all
Certainly the mid range acceleration is fantastic but I just find it lacks the low down grunt that makes for smooth powerful driving around town. It needs revving a lot more than the E39.

whoami

13,157 posts

247 months

Saturday 24th February 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
Ashok said:
I've had both and they're completely different animals. Think of the E39 as a charging rhino - all visceral and raw with lots of torque. The E60 by contrast is like the starship enterprise - high tech and slow to get going but once you floor it... whoosh! If you want an E60 more akin to the E39 consider an Alpina B5.

DOn't agree at all, Ashok. The B5 is a fast, but dull car.



The B5 is at least as fast (in real world conditions) as the M5 and I didn't find it particularly dull to drive. Softer, yes, but not really dull.

jm doc

2,928 posts

239 months

Sunday 25th February 2007
quotequote all
I have had 2 E39 M5's over the last 5 years or so, ran both up to around 50k miles, and recently changed the last one for the E60. I agree with Ashok that they are very different cars, around town the bottom end is just not quite the same in the E60, and I think there is something about the SMG box which doesn't help that feel around town, its just not quite as smooth at low speeds. That said, it's still very respectable and the clutchless box, whilst not as smooth as the E39 manual, is very relaxing as a result of not having to keep heaving on the clutch pedal in traffic.

However, on the open road, when you start putting the pedal down, it is just stunning in the way it responds and is on a totally different level in performance terms and completely addictive. It remains very usable around town, remember everything is relative, the E39 was just so good at that particular aspect, but overall, E60 is streets ahead. Add to that the fact that just as the classic E34 shape was gradually superceded by the beautiful E39 shape, so I find the E60 shape starting to make the E39 look a bit dated, and driving the occasional rental had made me aware of how the interior was dating.

In the end, I decided to go for it, and 3 months and 5k miles later feel I have bought into a legend that never fails to excite every time I get behind the wheel, and which is simply a better car than the E39, no contest.

stuh

2,557 posts

280 months

Sunday 25th February 2007
quotequote all
Interesting thread as the m5/m6 is very likely replacemnent for my e39 M5 in the very near future.

Just one observation from looking around the M5 in the showroom at my local dealership on Friday was the the interior looks very cheap and plasticky compared to the e39? The standard leather looked very cheap, as did the silver plastic trim. I've noticed a lot of 2nd hand cars come with the full Merimo leather option, is this a major improvement.

There was an M6 in the classified i had considered going to view (sadly now sold) that looked a million times better with the piano black finish.

www.pistonheads.com/sales/134720.htm

Any views from current owners re the comparitive interiors?




Edited by stuh on Sunday 25th February 18:41

Zod

35,295 posts

265 months

Sunday 25th February 2007
quotequote all
whoami said:
Zod said:
Ashok said:
I've had both and they're completely different animals. Think of the E39 as a charging rhino - all visceral and raw with lots of torque. The E60 by contrast is like the starship enterprise - high tech and slow to get going but once you floor it... whoosh! If you want an E60 more akin to the E39 consider an Alpina B5.

DOn't agree at all, Ashok. The B5 is a fast, but dull car.



The B5 is at least as fast (in real world conditions) as the M5 and I didn't find it particularly dull to drive. Softer, yes, but not really dull.

I'm slightly guilty of hype. Of course the B5 isn't a dull car, but I drove it back to back with the M5, having driven neither before and knew straight away that the M5 was the one I wanted. The B5 somehow felt bigger and less precise than the M5. The supercharger whine was irritating too.

derestrictor

18,764 posts

268 months

Sunday 25th February 2007
quotequote all
Stuh,

When you're physically in the E60 M5 the material quality and sense of well being is palpable - naturally more so in the M6, afaiwc.

However, the E39 ambience (like a late E38 7 next to it's replacement) is still special and not at all, imho, dated. The build - if not paint quality - truly first rate.

Looking at both cars side by side earlier, I derive great appreciation for both Bangle and pre-Bangle era models: the E39 M5 possesses an almost perfect proportional aesthetic.

I intend to find a superb, late E34 M5 at some stage, this time to keep for that car is at least as satisfying to behold.

{As far as E28 variants are concerned, there seem to be very few nice M5s available so that avenue may require deviance Alpinawards...banghead}

barrisimo

70 posts

243 months

Monday 26th February 2007
quotequote all
As a very new owner of an E60 M5 (two weeks ago), I'd say that the E60 is not without it's faults. Having come from a 996 Carerra 4s I can say that the luxury of the E60 is fantastic it's great to be seated inside and it is a techno geeks play pen. I must say though I find driving around town a little frustrating, and normally just use fully automatic as you just can't use the cars performance so its not worth trying. It drinks like an absolute fish and the fuel tank is laughably small for a car with a thirst like that. I am sure you can quite literally see the fuel gauge move as you stamp on the loud pedal. On the open road it is quite incredible and absolutely destroys my old 911 (and a new 997 judging by the other day). The E39 looks like an old car next to the E60 and I love the E60's aggressive styling - it might not be pretty but it has something to catch the eye and it certainly looks like a modern car.

Ashok

607 posts

266 months

Monday 26th February 2007
quotequote all
stuh said:
... the interior looks very cheap and plasticky compared to the e39? The standard leather looked very cheap, as did the silver plastic trim. I've noticed a lot of 2nd hand cars come with the full Merimo leather option, is this a major improvement.

Any views from current owners re the comparitive interiors?

Edited by stuh on Sunday 25th February 18:41


Full leather is nice but expensive and can be a pig to maintain if you have small kids. The standard colour choice is pretty poor and I do agree that the aluminium trim feels cheap. That said, once you start playing with the Individual interior options you can spec some very nice interiors. Of course it's a matter of personal taste and I've seen a few really odd ones (two tone seats etc). Personally, I have Caramel leather and a very rare wood trim called Light Figured Ash (NOT the same as Olive Ash Carrara). I love it.

stuh

2,557 posts

280 months

Tuesday 27th February 2007
quotequote all
Cheers Ashok / Der

That's the beauty of buying nearly new, should get the expensive options for not a lot. Just gotta choose between M5/6 now! I've got a 2 year old daughter so the 4 doors would be easier, but that M6 just looks such good value.


Edited by stuh on Tuesday 27th February 00:12

Zod

35,295 posts

265 months

Tuesday 27th February 2007
quotequote all
I have piano black and it looks very good.

I agree that the range is pitiful with town driving mpg, but I get over 300 miles out of a tank in motorway driving and I can live with that. I can never manage a 300 mile stretch with family in the car anyway!