Lunch break at work
Author
Discussion

rustyabarth

Original Poster:

103 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Bit of a rant really. Heres the story.

New guy has started at work 3 weeks ago, he has been told he is entitled to his 30 min lunch break which is fine.

Now we work at a small motor factors (3 of us on the desk/phones) and generally we occasionally pop down the town of a lunch or just sit and our desks and do without a break.
We have decided as new boy gets a break we would like to start taking our 30 mins as we are entitled to but the boss man has said, if you want a break then its minimum wage. If you carry on as usual (no proper lunch) then normal wage.

Can he do this?

Thanks in advance

The Boosh

116 posts

203 months

rustyabarth

Original Poster:

103 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
My main question is can he drop us to minimum wage without a problem if we start having out entitled to break

Mr E

23,039 posts

288 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
rustyabarth said:
My main question is can he drop us to minimum wage without a problem if we start having out entitled to break
What does your contract state?

Rick101

7,188 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Take your 30 min and use it to find another job with a responsible employer.

McAndy

16,553 posts

206 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
I believe that breaks can be specified as unpaid, although I'm happy to be contradicted!

rustyabarth

Original Poster:

103 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
He is a very reasonable employer thats the problem and is also a very good friend, i think thats what annoyed me the most how he reacted to me having my lunch break.

He has now put his point across that we are allowed to use our phones and internet etc and as long as we get the work done he doesnt mind what we do within reason.

Id still like to know if he can legally drop us to minimum wage if we decide to have lunch.

And my contract states 30 mins lunch break

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Does he mean he's paying you minimum wage for the duration of the break? Or for the entire working week?

The boss sounds like an arse to me. If he's happy to break rules regarding working times and breaks, then what else is he doing?

(An ex-employer of mine was a bit like that, he ended up stealing 2 years of our pension contributions and going down for it.)

Def check the contract.

rustyabarth

Original Poster:

103 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
He means if were going to start having lunch breaks he will put us on minumum wage like the new boy is currenty on.

Rick101

7,188 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
If you really do want this I suggest the three/four of you join forces and make it clear you are entitled to and want a break. However much of a 'mate' you think he is take stock of the fact he is lining his pockets at your expense.

However much people deride unions they are the sole reason for huge improvements in the work environment.

sunoco69

5,274 posts

194 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Rick101 said:
However much people deride unions they are the sole reason for huge improvements in the work environment.
Fully agree. All the ex-miners now have far better conditions than being under ground.

Rick101

7,188 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
That seems to be very much the attitude of the OP's employer.


McAndy

16,553 posts

206 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
rustyabarth said:
He means if were going to start having lunch breaks he will put us on minumum wage like the new boy is currenty on.
If your signed contract says differently then I don't believe that he can unless you sign an amended one. Which, I'm guessing, you won't.

Pothole

34,367 posts

311 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
rustyabarth said:
I still think he is a very reasonable employer and is also a very good friend,that's the problem
FTFY.

rustyabarth

Original Poster:

103 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Im off for four days now, so will see what happens when i return

santona1937

871 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Lunch break- what is this thing of which you speak?

santona1937

871 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Lunch break- what is this thing of which you speak?

Muzzer79

13,050 posts

216 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
I assume your salary is contracted?

In which case, he cannot give you a pay cut just because he feels like it and if you could prove it's because you're taking a lunch break you'd have a very good case against him.

However, I suspect your boss knows squat about HR and is just trying to extract the max out of you in a crap way.

I also suspect that if you rock the boat too much, he'll find another way to hurt you work-wise.

Be an adult - sit down with him and explain that you don't mind working through when it's busy, but don't want it to be every day. Be reasonable.

If he still gives you grief, consider how important your 30 mins is versus fighting your boss over this issue and go from there.

FWIW, the lowest paid employee in my dept arrives at 0900, takes precisely 60 mins for lunch and leaves at 1700 on the dot. I am entitled to do the same, but I don't get to and don't complain about it because I am more senior.
She doesn't complain that she doesn't earn as much as me either.

If you're considered more senior to new-boy and have a salary that reflects that, bear it in mind.

KFC

3,687 posts

159 months

Thursday 6th March 2014
quotequote all
Everyone is going on about the law but we're missing one important point here - how many hours is your shift? Are you actually entitled to a break at all in the first place?

roofer

5,136 posts

240 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
So new boy is on pittance wages and gets 30 mins, you have all took umbrage and are having a sulk. Man up and do as you were.