Well, I think I've heard everything now
Well, I think I've heard everything now
Author
Discussion

72EuropaTC

Original Poster:

207 posts

236 months

Friday 14th September 2012
quotequote all
Applied for a job today and got this response...


Hi XXXXX,

Thanks for your email.

I’m afraid my client won’t consider anyone who isn’t currently working. It’s a shame as experience wise you look good.

Should anything else come up I will definitely bear you in mind.

Best of luck in your search.

Thanks


Words fail me.

cqueen

2,647 posts

249 months

Friday 14th September 2012
quotequote all
The boss sounds like a small minded idiot. Consider it a bullet dodged.

Marf

22,907 posts

270 months

Friday 14th September 2012
quotequote all
W T and indeed F

GadgeS3C

4,727 posts

193 months

Friday 14th September 2012
quotequote all
With that attitude you probably had a lucky escape - words fail me too.

PH lurker

1,301 posts

186 months

Saturday 15th September 2012
quotequote all
GadgeS3C said:
With that attitude you probably had a lucky escape - words fail me too.
+1.
Don't let this one bother you; I don't think you'll be missing out on a broad minded/ good boss.

iphonedyou

10,409 posts

186 months

Saturday 15th September 2012
quotequote all
That's fairly incredible. As above, I'd consider that a very lucky escape to be quite honest.

I do hope the boss has terrible trouble when his new start fails to extricate himself cleanly and quickly from his current employ... smile

Chilli

17,320 posts

265 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
Hang on a mo. Whilst the response may seem a bit out of order, how do you know that the OP hasn't been working for say 25 years?! IF I had the choice of 2 people with the same experience, one of whom was currently in a position, the other has spent the last few years wnaking away in his bedroom, I know which one I'd go for!

Digger

16,804 posts

220 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
Out of interest what was the position advertised?

Xtype

2,877 posts

227 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
Chilli said:
Hang on a mo. Whilst the response may seem a bit out of order, how do you know that the OP hasn't been working for say 25 years?! IF I had the choice of 2 people with the same experience, one of whom was currently in a position, the other has spent the last few years wnaking away in his bedroom, I know which one I'd go for!
How do you not know it was not due to illness, maybe looking after a family member or any other reason. It is a poor reason to not interview a candidate.

singlecoil

35,826 posts

275 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
As it appears to have been an agency, it's entirely possible that the 'job' and the 'client' don't exist. Agent isn't very interested in the OP either as he can't phish for placing a canidate in the OP's current job.

craigjm

21,383 posts

229 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
Could also be that they need someone quickly and therefore cant wait for notice periods.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Could also be that they need someone quickly and therefore cant wait for notice periods.
You have that the wrong way round - the client won't consider someone who is unemployed.

Hoofy

79,993 posts

311 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
As it appears to have been an agency, it's entirely possible that the 'job' and the 'client' don't exist. Agent isn't very interested in the OP either as he can't phish for placing a canidate in the OP's current job.
Now, who would possibly do something like that? hehe (Can't remember that guy's name who was the subject of a PH thread.)

Deluded

4,968 posts

220 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
A friend of mine had it the opposite way around once. Applied for a job he was more than qualified for, went for an interview. Went great. Last question was a concern about him already being employed. He told them he was but looking to move elsewhere etc.

The interviewer then told him the position was only open to unemployed people and terminated the interview there and then...

Chilli

17,320 posts

265 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
Xtype said:
How do you not know it was not due to illness, maybe looking after a family member or any other reason. It is a poor reason to not interview a candidate.
I don't, but that's completely besides the point. Whether it was intentional or not, good natured or not, the OP hasn't been in work for wahtever period and (I assume) the other candidate(s) has/have.
If the OP had been long-term ill, or looking after a relative, he's automatically disadvantaged by this fact when compared to someone who currently has a job. Fair or not, that's life my friend.

72EuropaTC

Original Poster:

207 posts

236 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
The OP is not suffering from any disability or long term illness.
The OP has been gainfully employed for 25+ years until redundancy at his last place of work, owing to a major collapse in the company's client base and market.
As for the job, it was advertised as "Urgent" and is a senior managerial job for which one shouldn't be surprised about a 3 month notice period.

I'm inclined to agree it's an agency fishing. But, well, ....

craigjm

21,383 posts

229 months

Sunday 16th September 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
You have that the wrong way round - the client won't consider someone who is unemployed.
d'oh i wasnt feeling well earlier biggrin