RE: Bruntingthorpe exclusive

RE: Bruntingthorpe exclusive

Monday 30th April 2007

Bruntingthorpe exclusive

Testing and trackday venue wins appeal over noise protestors to stay alive


Brunters allowed to make the noise of car testing
Brunters allowed to make the noise of car testing
We’ve had some heart-warming news this morning at PH. Bruntingthorpe aerodrome and proving ground has won its appeal against the issue of a Noise Abatement Notice by Harborough District Council. The judge has quashed the Abatement Notice, and the facility will find out whether it will be successful in recouping any of the substantial costs it has incurred fighting the case by the end of this week.

The facility had been under the pressure of virtual closure for over a year, after the council responded to complaints from a small number of local residents. Bruntingthorpe already operates a noise policy (98dB static/ 87.5dB drive-by) that rules out race cars unless they run heavy silencing, but the council issued the notice according to Bruntingthorpe on the basis that “if people can hear it, it’s too noisy”.

Bruntingthorpe responded by highlighting the permission given by the planning authority in 1973 as a venue for vehicle testing. The judge agreed, stating that anyone moving to an area near a facility such as Bruntingthorpe must expect to hear the noise of vehicle testing. Those complaining had moved to the area with full access to information on what the facility undertakes.

“We’re absolutely delighted”, said Bruntingthorpe owner Dave Walton, “and we’ll now be concentrating on building up a trackday and events diary for the year ahead. We’ll be sticking to our agreed noise limits of course, and in fact we’re investing heavily in noise monitoring equipment for the site. This last 12 months has been hell, and I now know the anguish that Elvington, Castle Combe and others have faced. Let’s hope that this decision sets a precedent for future appeals, as it clearly indicates that people should be aware of what to expect when moving next to already established facilities.”

Well done, Brunters…

Author
Discussion

mars

Original Poster:

9,000 posts

220 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Hooray for common sense at last.clap

Captain Beaky

1,389 posts

290 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Great news. thumbup

dazren

22,612 posts

267 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
shout FANTASTIC NEWS!!!!!!

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

256 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Is the "established noise regs" that they're going ot continue to adhere to the ones that they've adhered to for the past year, or were they more stringent?

Nevertheless, commonsense from a judge. Bravo!

spokey

2,246 posts

215 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Hooray! Some sense at last!

RobPhoboS

3,454 posts

232 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Noise restrictions on ANY track is absurd.

Anyone who complains about this kind of thing needs to be punished.
hehe

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

233 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
PH article said:
The judge agreed, stating that anyone moving to an area near a facility such as Bruntingthorpe must expect to hear the noise of vehicle testing. Those complaining had moved to the area with full access to information on what the facility undertakes.


This man should be Lord Chancellor



Edited by kevin ritson on Monday 30th April 13:40

Shadytree

8,291 posts

255 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
dazren said:
shout FANTASTIC NEWS!!!!!!


I'm with Daz on that..

shout When's the next VMAX Craig ?

Mr Whippy

29,594 posts

247 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
It's like moving next to an airport and then complaining about the aircraft taking off and landing being too noisy.

Muppet people who complained should have been laughed at by the council, not pampered to. Who will be paying for this now, the residents of the local council area no doubt!

Nobbers.

Dave

craigw

12,248 posts

288 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Shadytree said:
dazren said:
shout FANTASTIC NEWS!!!!!!


I'm with Daz on that..

shout When's the next VMAX Craig ?


I spoke with brunters last week, watch this space

Gyrock

193 posts

241 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Who-bloody-rah!!

Fabulous news

Shadytree

8,291 posts

255 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
craigw said:
Shadytree said:
dazren said:
shout FANTASTIC NEWS!!!!!!


I'm with Daz on that..

shout When's the next VMAX Craig ?


I spoke with brunters last week, watch this space



You have me email sir

westie ian

27 posts

231 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
RobPhoboS said:
Noise restrictions on ANY track is absurd.

Anyone who complains about this kind of thing needs to be punished.
hehe


Donnington springs to mind! You can't hear the person standing next to you when a plane takes off over the track and yet you can talk all day long when there's a race on!

oddball rs

1,757 posts

224 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Doningtons situation really is absurd.

Been there how long? next to what an airport.............

corozin

2,680 posts

277 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
Finally a blow for common sense. I wonder if Castle Combe would be able to use this judgement as the basis for an appeal against Chippenham Council's successful noise "castration" judgement last year which saw the end of GT/F3 racing at this 49 year old circuit?

Well done Brunters


Edited by corozin on Monday 30th April 14:16

jon-

16,525 posts

222 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
1) Buy house with significant discount due to noisy track locally
2) Complain until track gets shut down
3) ?????
4) PROFIT!

batfink

1,032 posts

264 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
this is great news. If I could only perswade the missus, I would move next to a track. nothing like the sounds of racecars in the summer air

clubsport

7,295 posts

264 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
What great news and just shows the world hasn't gone too far in favour of the lentalist, lets hope this case is used as a legal precedent.

superkartracer

8,959 posts

228 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
oddball rs said:
Doningtons situation really is absurd.

Been there how long? next to what an airport.............


Yes it takes the Piss.....

TOOFM

26 posts

236 months

Monday 30th April 2007
quotequote all
This seems to happen a lot. I heard of a guy who bought a bungalow alongside the perimeter fence of Southend airport at Rochford and then set up a 'residents committee' to complain about noise at the airport. It turned out that the seller told him that the airport was to be closed and turned into a golf club/leisure centre. Its still an airport!