For track: Weight or Power?

For track: Weight or Power?

Author
Discussion

507bhp

Original Poster:

2 posts

40 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
On a track, what is more important for chasing laptimes? Lightness or Power?

Let's say for example you take a Caterham 620r, VS a Porsche GT3 RS.
Caterham being lighter but the Porsche possessing more power and being heavier.

GT3 RS 359 bhp per ton
Caterham 620R 508 bhp per ton.

Nurburgring time
GT3 RS - 6:65
Caterham 7:14

Surely the Caterham should have faster lap times considering its lightweight and higher power-weight ratio.


Bill

54,257 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Aerodynamics. Caterhams are shaped like a brick and struggle on fast circuits.

Miserablegit

4,173 posts

116 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
It is all circuit dependent-
Top speed of the Caterham is about 145 so it will lose out on the long straights.
Aero on the Gt3 will help in the corners whereas Caterham is relying on purely mechanical grip

The spinner of plates

17,955 posts

207 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all

Huff

3,226 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
507bhp said:
Surely the Caterham should have faster lap times considering its lightweight and higher power-weight ratio.
Much less total power though - and thats what you need to overcome drag at higher speeds.

simple illustration - small car, 200hp, vs a car twice as heavy with 400hp.
Suppose it takes (aribitrary but round/ high figure) 100hp to push either through the air at 100mph.

Above that speed , the heavier car has 300hp left to accelerate it; the small car only 100 - so now the available power :weight & power: drag is in favour of the more powerful car; and since power to overcome drag goes up with V^3, it only gets worse from there. More total power will be faster on a high-speed track.



Edited by Huff on Thursday 15th July 17:34

HustleRussell

25,205 posts

167 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Power helps on the straight.
Lightness helps on the straights and everywhere else.
Give me both, but if I’m picking one- lightness.

Bill

54,257 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Plus reduced wear in tyres, brakes etc. And I'd wager the Caterham driver had more fun. biggrin (

Huff

3,226 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Agree with both the above - I'll take 'light, fun and rewarding' every time. Like my tiny Fisher Fury.

(beside which - >100 in a straight line with your head in the breeze gets boring, very very quickly.)

Steve H

5,780 posts

202 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Yep, plenty to consider aside from pace but if that is the main issue then unsurprisingly there is a sweet spot in the centre.

Plenty of race series are based on power/weight ratios and occasionally a car at one extreme wins but mostly it’s one sat somewhere in the middle.

bigothunter

12,199 posts

67 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Power to drag ratio becomes dominant at high speeds, not power to mass. Regardless reducing mass has universal benefits.

timhum

163 posts

190 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Don't forget the driver.

Tim

bigothunter

12,199 posts

67 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
timhum said:
Don't forget the driver.

Tim
Yes I need to lose weight and drive faster biggrin

CABC

5,798 posts

108 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Huff said:
Much less total power though - and thats what you need to overcome drag at higher speeds.

simple illustration - small car, 200hp, vs a car twice as heavy with 400hp.
Suppose it takes (aribitrary but round/ high figure) 100hp to push either through the air at 100mph.

Above that speed , the heavier car has 300hp left to accelerate it; the small car only 100 - so now the available power :weight & power: drag is in favour of the more powerful car; and since power to overcome drag goes up with V^3, it only gets worse from there. More total power will be faster on a high-speed track.



Edited by Huff on Thursday 15th July 17:34
and so the difference between tracks is stark. Cadwell vs 'Ring. one for Caterhams the other for GT3s

Huff

3,226 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Exactly!

coppice

8,910 posts

151 months

Friday 16th July 2021
quotequote all
Caterhams can make you feel like a god too. Or at least a David taking down a Goliath a peg or two. I am no track star, very far from it , but I still recall overtaking a Porsche GT3 one lap , and a GT2 the next at Croft in a 160bhp Seven. Of course it helped that I know the track very well, and they may have been even more of a plodder than me - but it was still a buzz. Sailing past most cars' braking point is also curiously pleasing .

nickfrog

21,949 posts

224 months

Friday 16th July 2021
quotequote all
Interesting question. Lightness for sure. But then again, power can help in some scenarios on track days.

- it can help overtaking slower stuff who are not very co-operative in the straights.

- it can help carrying a bit more weight for either a passenger or simply for a bit more comfort/space/versatility on the way to the track, particularly to the Ring/Spa without having to tow a car.

- it may add a bit of safety in case of impact (by helping to carry more weight, including crumple zones) although the kinetic energy does go up too

- it may mean that you can run one road/track car rather than 2 cars

- it helps traction thanks to the (usually) added mass (that can be a negative).

Apart from that it's all downsides but all cars are compromises on track, including the light ones.

Edited by nickfrog on Friday 16th July 09:06

brillomaster

1,396 posts

177 months

Friday 16th July 2021
quotequote all
with an arbitrary target of 300bhp per tonne...

cadwell park, blyton park you probably want 150bhp in a 500kgs car
oulton, castle combe, snetterton you probably want 300bhp in a 1000kgs car
donington, and definitely silverstone you want 450bhp in a 1500kgs car.

for a trackday, i'd err on the side of power rather than lightweight. because you need power to overtake on the straights, which is where you're allowed to. in a race situation where you could sling it up the inside on the brakes, lightness is probably more important.

braddo

11,255 posts

195 months

Friday 16th July 2021
quotequote all
brillomaster said:
with an arbitrary target of 300bhp per tonne...

cadwell park, blyton park you probably want 150bhp in a 500kgs car
oulton, castle combe, snetterton you probably want 300bhp in a 1000kgs car
donington, and definitely silverstone you want 450bhp in a 1500kgs car.

for a trackday, i'd err on the side of power rather than lightweight. because you need power to overtake on the straights, which is where you're allowed to. in a race situation where you could sling it up the inside on the brakes, lightness is probably more important.
It would be an interesting comparison smile

Let's say roughly:

- R300 Caterham
- E30 M3 ex-race car softened up? VX220 turbo? Turbo'd MX5?
- 997 GT3 RS

QBee

21,415 posts

151 months

Saturday 17th July 2021
quotequote all
As said above, at the end of the day many of us are on a restricted budget, and not having to buy new tyres and brakes every two or three track days is a definite benefit that you get from a lighter weight car.
My TVR is 1060 kg, my R888r track tyres are about to do their 8th track day in September, and there is plenty of tread left. I am sure Lotus and Caterham drivers have a similar experiences.

I upgraded the power of my car from 300 to 400 bhp, because I thought I needed loads more power, but in fact I am not really any quicker because track speed is a mix of the cornering abilities of the car and the driver. Instruction at the track will make you faster down every straight because it will help you get out of the corners faster.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

142 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
^^ So much.

My old 3.2 boxster wrote off a set of tyres in 2 trackdays at significant expense. Can't recall what it is, about 265bhp/1250kgs? Brakes didn't last that long either. My 150bhp caterham isn't even close to that, must be about 10? days and I've just put new pads in the front / due some new tyres (which run to less than half of the cost of the boxsters for a set).

I'd guess the caterham is faster round most of the tracks I do, but then I'm a better driver now. It's certainly an easier car to extract the most from. It would however get spanked my the boxster on silverstone gp. But both were/are great fun, so what really..