03 Accord 2.4i vtec... info please

03 Accord 2.4i vtec... info please

Author
Discussion

pstruck

Original Poster:

3,518 posts

254 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Anyone got one of these and care to share some knowledge of running costs?

Book reckons 31mpg combined, but is this realistic?

What are servicing costs like? Is using a good independent garage a viable alternative to main dealer servicing?

vxrandy

1,785 posts

188 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
I've got a tourer 2.4 exec auto. Had it about 5 years and has been reliable apart from the power tailgate which required a new motor last year which honda did foc. Fuel consumption is shocking for such an underpowered car mine is on a par with my monaro at around 18-19mpg around town, but this is down to the auto box refusing to go into 5th at under 35mph the manuals are a lot better on fuel. Im a member on www.typeaccord.co.uk it might be worthwhile joining up there is a faults section and everyone is pretty friendly.

Andy

marsred

1,042 posts

230 months

Sunday 16th January 2011
quotequote all
I have a 2.4 Type S Tourer (2004) and its been faultless for the 2 1/2 years I've had it. As mentioned above the fuel consumption is not impressive at all, but I knew this when I bought it and paid less as a result. I wouldn't say it was underpowered though, maybe it isn't a huge engine which is perhaps what the previous poster meant, but for a huge family car it keeps me suitably entertained.

I always use an independent garage as I know and trust them, that's worth more to me than a Honda stamp in the book.

pstruck

Original Poster:

3,518 posts

254 months

Sunday 16th January 2011
quotequote all
marsred said:
I have a 2.4 Type S Tourer (2004) and its been faultless for the 2 1/2 years I've had it. As mentioned above the fuel consumption is not impressive at all, but I knew this when I bought it and paid less as a result. I wouldn't say it was underpowered though, maybe it isn't a huge engine which is perhaps what the previous poster meant, but for a huge family car it keeps me suitably entertained.

I always use an independent garage as I know and trust them, that's worth more to me than a Honda stamp in the book.
Thanks for the info. When you say the fuel consumption "is not impressive at all", what sort of figures are you getting?

marsred

1,042 posts

230 months

Sunday 16th January 2011
quotequote all
Around town its maybe 20mpg if you drive very nicely. On a run with cruise control its better at maybe 30 or so.

I think the problem is that it likes to be revved high and its just very hard to resist sometimes. I think if I did more miles than I do (15k a year at most) i'd be feeling the fuel cost but for me; its big, didn't cost me much for the amount of car, is entertaining enough to drive and faultlessly reliable so I love it.

tali1

5,268 posts

206 months

Sunday 16th January 2011
quotequote all
Well a 2.4 Accord will def be an avoid for me as always get 30-50% less mpg than everyone else

p-car

92 posts

266 months

Sunday 30th January 2011
quotequote all
I get about 24mpg on my short (9mile) daily commute and mixed weekend dodging about from my 2.4 Exec Tourer (Automatic). Longer A road/motorway trips see the average climb to 30+mpg. My full tankful record is 34mpg on the French autoroute i.e. almost no traffic to slow/accelerate for smile

What are you comparing it to? For a large powerful (190hp) petrol motor I think its pretty good. I tried a 2.0Ltr version and it was sloooooooow and gutless in comparison. I guess a 2.0ltr petrol Accord, or indeed anything else, might be 20& better on fuel but it'd be 20% slower as well so you pay you money and take your choice.

You could go weasel/diseasel but then everyone would think you're a cheapskate or a wannabe cabbie wink

Cheers

Mark

TotalControl

8,204 posts

203 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Can the 2.4 be remapped then?

vxrandy

1,785 posts

188 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
TotalControl said:
Can the 2.4 be remapped then?
I think one of the tuners assosiated with typeaccord tried but there were no real power gains, however the elite remap for the 2.2 diesel is very good.

PJ S

10,842 posts

232 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
TotalControl said:
Can the 2.4 be remapped then?
Sort of - not like diesels can though.
Need the US TSX ECU with Hondata - about £900 (probably more now with VAT increase & exchange rate)

TotalControl

8,204 posts

203 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Wondered if any more power could be extracted from the 2.4. Does seem a little under powered for its displacement.

PJ S

10,842 posts

232 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
Not much for the cost of doing so, esp air intake & exhaust.
Supercharger yes, but still need to involve Hondata & TSX ECU, which means losing deadlock function or something along that line.
If you use Google, you'll be able to see what my faded memory is half remembering.

joe_90

4,206 posts

236 months

Tuesday 22nd February 2011
quotequote all
I sold the s2000 to get one of these (needed a family car) and its excellent, drives 4 of us up and down to Scotland no worries, never goes wrong, the misses feels safe in it. It never misses a beat and tows the trailer with the track car on with no issues.

its is a little thirsty thou, and there is no real vtec to mention.. Its a excellent car all around thou, and cheapo now for what you get.