Would you buy a super bike?

Would you buy a super bike?

Poll: Would you buy a super bike?

Total Members Polled: 133

Yes: 27%
No: 48%
Already do: 25%
Author
Discussion

jimmy156

Original Poster:

3,699 posts

193 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
So for the purpose of this poll, don’t include yourself if you are the in a position where N+1 means your 6th bike, which will go on the back of your Porsche for alpine cycling holidays.

This question is aimed at those whose it would be their only road bike.

For most of us, we could never afford an exotic super car, but a lot of us could afford a super bike, so it becomes a matter of justifying spending 5, 7, 10k (wherever “super” starts, I’m not really sure) on a bike, when that might be the same (or more) of the value of our car.

Since seeing the GCN review of it, I go wobbly kneed every time I think about the Wilier Filante SLR, but I wouldn’t want to ride a 9k bike for fear of falling off or otherwise damaging it!



So would you?

Edited by jimmy156 on Sunday 17th January 20:20


Edited by jimmy156 on Sunday 17th January 20:20

Scabutz

8,056 posts

86 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
Not my road bike, but my Triathlon bike came out at around 7k once wheels and PMs are counted. It ain't half nice riding a decent set of pedals.

Kawasicki

13,411 posts

241 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
No. I don’t see the value in it for my particular case. The bike would be a small % faster, but my true performance bottleneck is my inconsistency in training.

I don’t get inspired to train by the bike itself.

nammynake

2,606 posts

179 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
I may well do when (if) the new Dura Ace comes out. I tend to keep bikes for 5+ years so the annualised cost isn’t that high, even for a super bike.

I’m under no illusions of being faster on a more expensive bike - it would primarily for the overall ride/feel and wow factor.

Captain Raymond Holt

12,241 posts

200 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
Road bike, no.

MTB, yes. You (or I at least) notice the gains more.

J4CKO

42,473 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
If I wont the lottery maybe but would feel unworthy, too old and fat to make proper use of one.


boyse7en

7,036 posts

171 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
I'm still umming and ahhing over whether I can justify spending £500 on a secondhand road bike to replace my now 11 year old crosscountry steed, so the idea of spending £5k or more would terrify me.
I'd be worried about it being stolen, crashing it, or just not being quick enough to do it justice.

TCX

1,976 posts

61 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
No got carbon TCR,105 groupset,light,stiff fast enough but spend most of time on alloy framed 105 geared cross/ gravel bike,so called superbikes,£5+k do nothing for me,could afford one just don't want one

MrBarry123

6,038 posts

127 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
As my only bike, I’m not sure I could justify going much beyond £5k, unless I suddenly became VERY wealthy.

And if I had £10k to spend, I’d rather buy 3 bikes than 1.

anonymous-user

60 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
I tend to buy something 3 or 4 years old that would have been a low end super bike when new

E.g In 2019 I bought a 2015 wilier zero7 with campag super record group set

Started back in the day with a colnago c40 about a week after the c50 was launched

anonymous-user

60 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
If I did it would be titanium, made to measure and utterly bespoke

keith2.2

1,100 posts

201 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
Everyone seems to conflate the purchase of a super bike with it being ‘because faster’.

Ok to an extent that may be true, but generally they’re also just more pleasurable to ride - they feel different.

PomBstard

7,046 posts

248 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
Captain Raymond Holt said:
Road bike, no.

MTB, yes. ....
Yep, with you on this

Dnlm

320 posts

50 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
Spending money on bikes is one of the few hobbies I've kept up through Coronavirus.... It's not THAT ruinous Vs say cars, fancy houses, or a drug habit.

I've tended to buy "decent" and then slowly upgrade, but prospect of getting something perfect is pretty attractive.

Am with the comments that marginal speed isn't the only important thing , but also it would suck to be the guy on an S-works getting overtaken by everybody.

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

5,690 posts

61 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
Why limit the thread to just roadbikes? Plenty of super mtbs in the your bike thread.

Back on topic.. I have a 'super' road bike of sorts. It should have been 10k new as a bike. I needed a new frame at the time and westbrook got hold of a load of NOS Scott bikes and I picked up the frame and fork for less than 200 quid. To which I then bolted tatty old campy bottom end components... Much to the annoyance of a couple of roady mates. Like bolting steel wheels to a ferrari was one analogy drawn.

I have to say, subjectively, it really isn't that much better than the brand x it replaced - certainly not enough to warrant the RRP price difference.

So for me no for a road bike, yes for mtb.

MockingJay

1,312 posts

135 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
I asked this very question a few months ago, and ended up buying a Pinarello. Very pleased that it did, it’s just on another level compared to my tarmac and the propel I had previously.



Edited by MockingJay on Monday 18th January 07:30

Dnlm

320 posts

50 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
Why limit the thread to just roadbikes? Plenty of super mtbs in the your bike thread.

Back on topic.. I have a 'super' road bike of sorts.
Wouldn't exclude MTB, but would frame only! I'd almost certainly go for "top" drivetrain/wheels with a middling frame if made to choose...

LimaDelta

6,861 posts

224 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
10k is a standard sort of toy benchmark isn't it? It could be a track prepared MX-5, or a motorbike, a decent shotgun or rifle/scope combo, even a cheap microlight or sailing boat. You could probably spend that on a set of golf clubs. The problem comes when there are already lots of other similar expensive toys in the inventory. If cycling was 'your thing' then I don't see any issue with it. If cycling is just one of many 'things' which fill your time it becomes harder to justify.

For me I wouldn't because:

a) I only ride once or twice a week,
b) I'm not fit or fast enough to appreciate the difference (let's face it, if you are going to draw that much attention to yourself then you better have the ability to back it up),
c) cycling is just one of many things which take up my time and money, a couple of 2-3k bikes is fine, 10k may be noticed by the purchasing department and have a detrimental effect on other spends.
d) while the bike in the OP is undoubtedly lovely to look at, I have no emotional attachment to it. It is just another expensive bike to me, I'm not a bike spotter so couldn't tell you anything about it. It's certainly not something I would lie awake thinking about.

Buuuuut, if it does it for you, and it is your one bike, and you do lie awake thinking about it, then buy it, and enjoy every moment of it!

Just don't drop it, and make sure it is insured!

PomBstard

7,046 posts

248 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
Dnlm said:
Wouldn't exclude MTB, but would frame only! I'd almost certainly go for "top" drivetrain/wheels with a middling frame if made to choose...
I went frame-only and then the other way - top frame, decent fork and respectable kit. I'd probably not notice too much difference going from, say, XT to XTR, but wanted the frame as the starting point. As bits wear out they'll get replaced, ahem, appropriately...

Dannbodge

2,196 posts

127 months

Monday 18th January 2021
quotequote all
Already have one.

S-Works Tarmac SL6 with Dura Ace 9170