Mavic R-Sys SLR Wheels
Mavic R-Sys SLR Wheels
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
[redacted]

nammynake

2,658 posts

202 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
Very light (for clinchers), very stiff and seem to be pretty reliable based on what I've read online. If they do go bang you'll be faced with a very large bill to repair.

Your post is quite vague - what are you requirements? Just the bling factor, or do you race at a high level?

Dammit

3,816 posts

237 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
202 Firecrests are £1,636.07 on Wiggle, and they're a quantum leap ahead of the R-Sys.

I'd rather ride Aksiums than R-Sys, and I'd take the Zipps over both.

nammynake

2,658 posts

202 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
If you're expecting measurable gains (average speeds, Strava segment times) above your existing Quattro's you are likely to be disappointed. I've ridden various wheelsets and I've concluded at my level (regular club cyclist) that the most important areas to differentiate between wheelsets are the 'feel' and the 'look'.

Light wheels will feel nice and snappy on hills and when accelerating, but shaving 100-200 g from your wheels will not suddenly add 1 mph onto your average speed or knock 10 seconds of a 1 minute climb. A deeper, but slightly heavier, wheelset might feel a tad less lively in comparison, but you'll struggle to measure an tangible difference in average speed or climbing speed.

okgo

42,126 posts

227 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Spokes can be expensive and hard to find.

I would go for some 50mm wheels, most of your rides are pretty flat so you'll see benefit from the aero factor while giving away almost nothing up the hills. However I would say as above, they don't make as much difference as they should for the money. Ironically an aero helmet will probably save you more watts than any wheelset and better kit, I.e properly race fit and an aero helmet would be better likely than a whole new bike that was aero and Enve wheels.

ALawson

8,054 posts

280 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
I read somewhere that an aero bar made one of the greatest drag savings compared to other expenditure.

Obviously not the chocolate type wink

Barchettaman

7,254 posts

161 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Oh dear.

Jimbo.

4,217 posts

218 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
okgo said:
Spokes can be expensive and hard to find.

I would go for some 50mm wheels, most of your rides are pretty flat so you'll see benefit from the aero factor while giving away almost nothing up the hills. However I would say as above, they don't make as much difference as they should for the money. Ironically an aero helmet will probably save you more watts than any wheelset and better kit, I.e properly race fit and an aero helmet would be better likely than a whole new bike that was aero and Enve wheels.
Aero helmets or racey positions don't carry the same coffee shop kudos, however.

Dammit

3,816 posts

237 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
I've had 808's, 404 FC's and am currently running Stinger 4's on the race bike, of them all the 808's sounded best, there's not much between the 404 FC and the Stinger 4 but the HED has nicer hubs/better lacing.

There is a genuine difference between "proper" aero wheels and stuff like the R-Sys, which given the section of the spokes probably qualify as "improper" aero wheels.

You get that tail-wind feeling above 20mph, and it gets better the faster you go.

= if you want to go fast, go deep, and go with a rim design that has spent time in the wind tunnel.

I'd get some Flo30 for training on/raining and some second hand Stinger 6's (or deeper) if you are racing in flat country, 4's if you are heading for hills/mountains.


Dowks

449 posts

275 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Friend had a pair and had a couple of spokes snap, PITA to replace. Now has some Enve 3.4 no problems at all

duff

1,049 posts

228 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
If you're looking at the R-SYS I'd go for the new Fulcrum Zero Nites or the Campag equivalent : http://www.bike-discount.de/en/buy/campagnolo-sham...

Not quite as light but a fair bit cheaper, probably more reliable and they also have no horrible shiny aluminium brake track wink

Otherwise the Aero 38 from Wheelsmith?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
For an all round solid wheelset off the peg there are loads of deals on Fulcrum Zeros at the mo, they're light and bullet proof. If it were my money I'd stick £6-700 that way and get a set of 40mm cheap carbon clinchers. I have a set of deep Zipp's and have borrowed some Chinese wheels, there is not as much difference as people would have you believe. They are all crap(ish) in the wet and they all flex to some degree. (404's, 808's and Chinese do with me anyway)

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
yonex said:
For an all round solid wheelset off the peg there are loads of deals on Fulcrum Zeros at the mo, they're light and bullet proof. If it were my money I'd stick £6-700 that way and get a set of 40mm cheap carbon clinchers. I have a set of deep Zipp's and have borrowed some Chinese wheels, there is not as much difference as people would have you believe. They are all crap(ish) in the wet and they all flex to some degree. (404's, 808's and Chinese do with me anyway)
Aluminium brake track - it's worth it to be able to stop.
I have some full carbon 50mm tubs and a set of Dura Ace 7850 50mm clinchers. The Dura Ace wheels are sublime. Ally brake track stops, the extra oomph on the flat or downhill from the deep section profile is noticeable and the all up 1590g weight means they are hardly heavyweights.

I cant see myself swapping those out for anything in the short term.

RGambo

883 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
I have R-sys wheelset. they are great wheels. With the exalith surface braking is superb. I'm a chunky rider at 85-90KGS and I have not found an issue with flex at all. They have 1 small characteristic, they are quite slow wheels once you get around the 22+mph. the spokes being round aren't very aero and you do notice it. I have noticed that at high speeds 35+mph sometimes you can feel a high frequency vibration which I think is the air buffeting around.
it's not an issue, just a characteristic.

Matt_N

9,035 posts

231 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
TheLemming said:
Aluminium brake track - it's worth it to be able to stop.
I have some full carbon 50mm tubs and a set of Dura Ace 7850 50mm clinchers. The Dura Ace wheels are sublime. Ally brake track stops, the extra oomph on the flat or downhill from the deep section profile is noticeable and the all up 1590g weight means they are hardly heavyweights.

I cant see myself swapping those out for anything in the short term.
I sold my 7850 C50s just before my fall, lovely lovely wheels.

If they were C35s I would've kept them but with a little'un my free time this year would be limited for time trialling etc and so the plan was to get some hand built all rounders.

Then I broke my hip!

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
Matt_N said:
TheLemming said:
Aluminium brake track - it's worth it to be able to stop.
I have some full carbon 50mm tubs and a set of Dura Ace 7850 50mm clinchers. The Dura Ace wheels are sublime. Ally brake track stops, the extra oomph on the flat or downhill from the deep section profile is noticeable and the all up 1590g weight means they are hardly heavyweights.

I cant see myself swapping those out for anything in the short term.
I sold my 7850 C50s just before my fall, lovely lovely wheels.

If they were C35s I would've kept them but with a little'un my free time this year would be limited for time trialling etc and so the plan was to get some hand built all rounders.

Then I broke my hip!
Ouch Ouch Ouch.....

But at least the wheels were ok, having been sent off somewhere safe? smile

adam85

1,264 posts

220 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
I'm glad this thread came up, some excellent advice on wheels here. I was in the same predicament regarding going "Aero" and the perceived benefits.
In the end I watched "Durianrider" on YouTube, Carbed up and bought a power meter.

fromage

538 posts

232 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
TheLemming said:
Aluminium brake track - it's worth it to be able to stop.
I have some full carbon 50mm tubs and a set of Dura Ace 7850 50mm clinchers. The Dura Ace wheels are sublime. Ally brake track stops, the extra oomph on the flat or downhill from the deep section profile is noticeable and the all up 1590g weight means they are hardly heavyweights.

I cant see myself swapping those out for anything in the short term.
I don't think Aluminium braking surfaces are all that important as you can still instantly lock a wheel with a carbon braking surface in the rain.

Though Shimano Dura Ace C24's are lovely and pretty sure the Shimano 11 speed spacing is the same as 11 speed campag now and alot cheaper than the Mavics

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
fromage said:
TheLemming said:
Aluminium brake track - it's worth it to be able to stop.
I have some full carbon 50mm tubs and a set of Dura Ace 7850 50mm clinchers. The Dura Ace wheels are sublime. Ally brake track stops, the extra oomph on the flat or downhill from the deep section profile is noticeable and the all up 1590g weight means they are hardly heavyweights.

I cant see myself swapping those out for anything in the short term.
I don't think Aluminium braking surfaces are all that important as you can still instantly lock a wheel with a carbon braking surface in the rain.

Though Shimano Dura Ace C24's are lovely and pretty sure the Shimano 11 speed spacing is the same as 11 speed campag now and alot cheaper than the Mavics
I've ridden full carbon tubs, I know there are variations with exalith brake tracks etc etc and the new Zipps claiming their latest Firecrest brake track is as good as aluminium. I haven't tried the funky improved versions.

What I found was that braking was poor. You can lock it up (after a revolution of the wheel to clear the brake track, I haven't found it to be instant) but there are very few situations where you'd want to do that.
Modulation is whats missing, there's very little between "no braking" and "locked up".

Perhaps there's a LOT more user skill needed to use full carbon brake tracks in the wet than aluminium. Maybe there's a knack to it - but I haven't acquired it.

RGambo

883 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
I know what you mean with carbon braking in the wet. My theory and it's only a theory is the heat. Let me explain,
Wet braking surface means no braking so you add more pressure, then the water clears the temp of the blocks flare up and the friction ramps up and wham, you've locked up. You almost have to second guess them, which isn't helpfull.
Ali rims remain at a more consistant temp.
Just my theory.
I rode some zipp 202's in the Alps last year and I was really pleased with how they performed brake wise, it was dry the whole time. I must admit to not wanting to use them if it was wet on an alpine descent.