How Dangerous/Dodgy Is Road Biking?

How Dangerous/Dodgy Is Road Biking?

Author
Discussion

Nobby Diesel

Original Poster:

2,062 posts

256 months

Friday 4th July 2014
quotequote all
Mrs Nobby likes to keep fit.
Good job too!!!

Now, she's been doing a bit of road biking over the last 18 months.
Mostly on weekends, when there are lots of cyclists out on the road.

This morning, she decided to go for a ride. Left the house at about 6 AM.
So the roads are fairly quiet, but she had to use a NSL main road to get home.
She got whacked by some fella in a Transit; his NS door mirror hitting her hip. That sounds like a mighty close shave to me.

No injuries, apart from a bruise. He stopped and made the right noises, but no explanation of why he hit her.

Is this a normal event? I think she would be far better off, cycling in a small group of 2 or 3 riders. More visible.

Appreciate constructive thoughts and advice.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

157 months

Friday 4th July 2014
quotequote all
At the risk of sounding blasé about it, I think it is one of those things - in the same way incidents happen in cars because one car is negligent/careless.

I have been cycling for 3-4 years now, and never had a run in with another road user *touches wood*. I appreciate this is partly luck, but also partly a function of being daubed in bright colours and having lights on etc.

Its a case of doing all you can to be seen and looking after yourself

Joey Ramone

2,152 posts

130 months

Friday 4th July 2014
quotequote all
I find it very safe. That's because I never cycle on busy roads

Rich_W

12,548 posts

217 months

Friday 4th July 2014
quotequote all
Well that sounds pretty bloody horrible for your Mrs. And I suspect she should report it to the Police! more for the fact she;s made a record so if idiot boy does it again, they can show repeat offending. (Probably do nothing but better to spend the time)

AS for danger. "Generally" the rush hour morning is worst, but my advice would be to try and choose roads where they are

a) wide enough for cars to pass you without having to think about it. People are lazy by and large so a lot (not all) don't want to have to slow down or move across and these are the inbreds that reckon you are costing them hours of their valuable time and are likely to do something stupid rather than wait 5 seconds.


and

b) Not going significantly faster than yourself.

Clearly this is not equal rights for cyclists, but as ever better to be safe and enjoying it.

Kermit power

29,386 posts

218 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
I'd suggest you ask a mod to move this to the Pedal Powered section. You'll get a more complete response!

Personally, I think whilst there will always be pillocks on the road - both on bikes and in other vehicles - you can do a lot to avoid being affected by their idiocy if you're observant and prepared to anticipate the actions of others.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

133 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Roads are paid for to get people from A to B in cars and vans and lorries to make £. If you want to go cycling on them among all those NCAP rated cars or 7.5 tonne lorries then you have to take the rough with the smooth I'm afraid.

The whole infrastructure of our roads is not created for, or paid for, so people can do their hobby on two wheels.





Edited by Gandahar on Saturday 5th July 16:57

Kermit power

29,386 posts

218 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
Roads are paid for to get people from A to B in cars and vans and lorries to make £ if you want to go cycling on them among all those NCAP rated cars or 7.5 tonne lorries then you have to take the rough with the smooth I'm afraid.
rofl

It didn't take long for someone to come along with the trolling bks, did it!

anonymous-user

59 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
What a piss poor attitude.

Matt_N

8,911 posts

207 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
Roads are paid for to get people from A to B in cars and vans and lorries to make £. If you want to go cycling on them among all those NCAP rated cars or 7.5 tonne lorries then you have to take the rough with the smooth I'm afraid.

The whole infrastructure of our roads is not created for, or paid for, so people can do their hobby on two wheels.





Edited by Gandahar on Saturday 5th July 16:57
That really makes you look like a complete tt.

BoRED S2upid

20,150 posts

245 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Keep off the main roads and avoid the peak times before and after work touch wood vie never had a run in with a motorist in 15 years but you have to ride with respect for cars and vans.

anonymous-user

59 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
The whole infrastructure of our roads is not created for, or paid for, so people can do their hobby on two wheels.
Yet there was an extensive surfaced road network before cars arrived.

I wonder who used it?

hyperblue

2,813 posts

185 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
Roads are paid for to get people from A to B in cars and vans and lorries to make £. If you want to go cycling on them among all those NCAP rated cars or 7.5 tonne lorries then you have to take the rough with the smooth I'm afraid.

The whole infrastructure of our roads is not created for, or paid for, so people can do their hobby on two wheels.
Strange, because I'm pretty sure I still get paid when I have the audacity to commute by bike on these roads.

mph1977

12,467 posts

173 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
Roads are paid for to get people from A to B in cars and vans and lorries to make £. If you want to go cycling on them among all those NCAP rated cars or 7.5 tonne lorries then you have to take the rough with the smooth I'm afraid.

The whole infrastructure of our roads is not created for, or paid for, so people can do their hobby on two wheels.





Edited by Gandahar on Saturday 5th July 16:57
only two possible places to send this muppet

1. back under his bridge
2. the clue shop

at least he didn't talk about VED as 'road tax' and suggest it is hypotheticated

JQ

5,933 posts

184 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Back on topic - does she understand primary and secondary positioning? Where I feel it unsafe for a car to overtake me I'll take a primary position, so they can't. I don't feel unsafe cycling as I'm pro-active with regard to my own safety, however, I'm not sure I'd feel the same if I just cycled everywhere in the gutter. Sounds like the van driver may have tried an overtake where one was not available. The reverse of course being that where I am holding up a car for a distance, I'll try my best to let them get past me.

Deanno1dad

596 posts

229 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
I do a fair bit of cycling..I try and go out weekends or after morning rush hour time.
It's all about giving yourself less chance of a problem.

I've recently joined a club as well..I find that the larger the group the better your odds.

Obviously the brighter your jersey the better.

mdavids

675 posts

189 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
IMO, it's all about increasing your odds. You're never going to be 100% safe no matter what you do but you can mitigate the risks somewhat.

For me this means picking my roads carefully, perhaps drive them first to see what they're like. You shouldn't have to as in an ideal world you'd get respect, time and space no matter where you rode but this is the U.K. where a sizeable percentage have barely evolved past the chimp stage.

I'll happily ride on busy roads but stick to 30/40 mph limits which are wide enough to allow cars to pass without having to ride in the gutter or take up the whole lane. I'm happy taking a primary position round blind corners, parked cars and pinch points but not for extended periods of time.

I'll happily ride rural NSL roads but only if they're quiet enough to allow me to take a lane for the majority of the time. Drivers can see me from way back and have no excuse to squeeze past as there's generally very little coming the other way.

I never ride on fast and busy trunk roads however I have no need to as there's nearly always an alternative and there's much nicer roads to ride on where I live.

Basically I try and limit the time that drivers spend waiting for me. A lot of riders will disagree and that's fine, I'd never try and dictate how people should ride just stating what (so far) works for me. I've done over 10000 miles over the last 2 years, about half of which was commuting on a variety of roads and never had a close call.

There's no excuse for your missus getting clipped by a mirror and the van driver should have his license removed.

FiF

45,109 posts

256 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Agree with the comments about increasing your odds and being sensible to minimise vulnerability.

While there are plonkers in control of every class of vehicle it never ceases to amaze me how people put themselves in the most life threatening situations seemingly oblivious that they are trusting complete strangers.
Regularly used to see an old geezer cycling up the A38 on his way home from work every night on a tricycle. Ok on light evenings but on dark winter nights with a glow worm for a rear light. eek

trashbat

6,008 posts

158 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
I did five years and about 25,000 miles of rush hour commuting by bike. Filtering through urban jams, mixing it with lorries on NSL A-roads and rural twisties, the lot. In the dark and all weather since I had no car for most of it.

In that time I had one actual 'other vehicle' accident when I tried to negotiate a poor visibility mini roundabout at 20mph and someone pulled out. I rode away fine.

I also once called 999 when I got into an argument with a driver who then followed me about for an hour. Something about cycle lanes and road tax, actually.

There were a few near misses and a bit of aggro from time to time but I didn't and don't consider it dangerous. IME you are mostly able to heavily influence your own safety through constantly developing better riding, even when other people's behaviour isn't up to much. Whether you should have to go to such lengths is another question.

So, possibly somewhere like London excluded, I think it can be very safe. If you work to make it that way.


feef

5,206 posts

188 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Been cycling for a few years, even when commuting 20 miles to Cambridge on a busy A road, the only memorable 'incidents' I recall was when I realised my front tyre had a slight buckle in it when I braked on a downhill towards a red light, and when my camelbak froze up early one March.

I don't commute any more, so just do weekend cycle rides with the local club, and the occasional time trial or sportive. Still never had any close calls, at least not close enough to bother me.

Nobby Diesel

Original Poster:

2,062 posts

256 months

Saturday 5th July 2014
quotequote all
Thanks folks, for the comments.

Good point Kermit, this is probably in the wrong sub forum - cheers.

Gandahar - interesting perspective and to be honest, not one that I can agree with. To me, you have come across as a weapons grade bellend. Maybe I'm wrong though.