Cyclists coming to the front
Cyclists coming to the front
Author
Discussion

Sump

Original Poster:

5,512 posts

196 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
I had this happen to me twice yesterday at traffic lights.

A cyclist would go out of his way to come to the front, but then to get off the mark would take him 6-7 seconds...

Why do they actually have a box at the front for them? Motorcycles are fine as they have always gotten off the mark relatively quickly but cyclists always take an age. Especially when you're involve a junction at the lights with them turning left and right. Then it begins to create alot more confusion and delays.

Isn't it better for them to stay where they were and then to get off the mark and upto speed on the left side rather than coming up to the front and in the middle?

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

233 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
You saw him

You didn't turn left and kill him


Urban Sports

11,321 posts

232 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
This does my head in as well, if they paid road tax I would be more tolerant.

tomsugden

2,470 posts

257 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
The road tax that was abolished in 1937?

LC2

254 posts

202 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
popcorn...

stuttgartmetal

8,156 posts

245 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
How is it they can ride with impunity, everywhere.
Is it not time we made cyclists have a licence.

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

233 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Oh screw it


I DEMAND THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KILL ALL CYCLISTS

s3fella

10,524 posts

216 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Urban Sports said:
This does my head in as well, if they paid road tax I would be more tolerant.
It was probly a Muslim too!!

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
You saw him

You didn't turn left and kill him
+1

You'll get delayed a lot longer than 7 seconds if you run over a cyclist.

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
What bugs me more is when you spend time waiting to overtake a cyclist safely then at the next set of lights they insist on almost scraping down the side of all the cars to get to the front. Then you have to wait and overtake them safely again because god forbid you get a little too close for their comfort.

Surely logic would dictate that rather than hold everyone up again they should maybe wait behind the cars that have just overtaken them, you know, like car drivers would? (and yes I do cycle on roads)

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Logic would dictate that it would be a good idea to build segregated cycle routes. Don't think of the cycle areas as a way for cyclists to re-pass everyone, it's a way of keeping them safe.

ChasW

2,162 posts

231 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
I have stopped a few on busy London pavements. One guy on a Boris bike got really shirty with me when I stopped him. He was cycling down Kingsway against a flow of pedestrians mostly coming from Waterloo direction on the day of a tube strike! I pointed out his stupidity but he seemed not to understand it.

Honestherbert

592 posts

176 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Typical PH cyclist thread already. Op I agree that they can be a pest most of the time, but you won't get any form of reasonable debate on here as the moment something negative is said about a cyclist the OP gets jumped on! ha ha.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

177 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
davepoth said:
McWigglebum4th said:
You saw him

You didn't turn left and kill him
+1

You'll get delayed a lot longer than 7 seconds if you run over a cyclist.
That's a good point.

Time to modify my driving, I'll stop aiming for them in future scratchchin

Nigel Worc's

8,121 posts

217 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
14-7 said:
What bugs me more is when you spend time waiting to overtake a cyclist safely then at the next set of lights they insist on almost scraping down the side of all the cars to get to the front. Then you have to wait and overtake them safely again because god forbid you get a little too close for their comfort.

Surely logic would dictate that rather than hold everyone up again they should maybe wait behind the cars that have just overtaken them, you know, like car drivers would? (and yes I do cycle on roads)
I'm with you, I see this all the time around Worcester.

One day this week I was in a line of cars that had to follow a cyclist up quite a steep hill, at 5 - 7 mph, the road isn't wide enough to overtake them with traffic coming the other way, even if they were in the gutter, which this one delights in not being.

I was third behind her, and I'd eventually got past, but had to stop at some lights, there really isn't room for her to come down the inside, there just isn't, so she goes on the pavement, gets to the front of the traffic, then off the pavement into the "cycle box", and does it all over again, only this time she's on the flat.

She then shouts and waves her fist at anyone that overtakes her.

She does this all the time, it's a pity the old bag doesn't have a heart attack whilst she's screaming at everyone.

I see her behave like this everytime I come across her, which is normally a couple of times a week, I'm amazed nobody has done something to her to be honest, she's been at this for several years now.

danjama

5,728 posts

171 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
I can assure you it doesn't take me 7 seconds to get up to speed. But we can't all be so athletic.

Here's a thought. If you know you will only be sitting at the next set of lights behind them anyway, what's the big rush?

This thread...

Coolbanana

4,419 posts

229 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Logic would dictate that it would be a good idea to build segregated cycle routes. Don't think of the cycle areas as a way for cyclists to re-pass everyone, it's a way of keeping them safe.
Like they have in the Netherlands and Belgium? Yes, brilliant idea and would be great here. Who's gonna pay for it though? No-one is interested. So cyclists have no choice but to share the rest of road as per their legal entitlement.

va1o

16,114 posts

236 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Pisses me off too when I'm driving back from the station and all these hero cyclists are getting in the bloody way at the lights. They should just dismount and get on the pavement as it makes it less dangerous for them and doesn't inconvenience other road users.

Honestherbert

592 posts

176 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Typical PH cyclist thread already. Op I agree that they can be a pest most of the time, but you won't get any form of reasonable debate on here as the moment something negative is said about a cyclist the OP gets jumped on! ha ha.

JCF22

10 posts

161 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Try driving in Brighton the council spent a fortune on a cycle lane in Lewes road and a large amount of cyclist still don't bother to use it.