Wanting a bike
Author
Discussion

OpalFruit

Original Poster:

7 posts

164 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Hi,

Im looking towards getting a mountain bike, roughly doing 12 miles a day just for work, want something comfy not to expensive £200ish maybe? what would you guys recommend?

Disco You

3,748 posts

209 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Why do you want a mountain bike to cycle to work?

For £200, you'll certainly be best off going second hand.

S10GTA

13,790 posts

196 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Hybrid? Road Bike?

OpalFruit

Original Poster:

7 posts

164 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Not only for work, also something to do if i get bored on any days, as there are quiet alot of off road routes around me, nothing major.. im new to this so any advice would be appreciated

Gizmoish

18,150 posts

238 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Not having a go at this OP in particular, but I wonder why it is that so many people taking up cycling think that £200 is a "reasonable" budget to start looking at? It can't be coincidence. Is it because it's double the price Tesco charge for an obvious POS?

I'd say that "decent" bikes (new) start at £500, which is also a decent starter SLR camera budget - but you don't get loads of people in the camera forum asking which SLR to buy for £200?


blugnu

1,523 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Gizmoish said:
Not having a go at this OP in particular, but I wonder why it is that so many people taking up cycling think that £200 is a "reasonable" budget to start looking at? It can't be coincidence. Is it because it's double the price Tesco charge for an obvious POS?

I'd say that "decent" bikes (new) start at £500, which is also a decent starter SLR camera budget - but you don't get loads of people in the camera forum asking which SLR to buy for £200?
You can't get anything vaguely like an SLR for £200 though. Perhaps that's why no-one asks.

I'd hope that if someone comes on the photography forum asking which compact camera to buy for about £200 they don't get told that it'll be rubbish and they should get something 2.5x as expensive.

OP - you'll probably get a better bike if you go secondhand - it's like spending £6k on a car and choosing between a 'it'll get you there and back and probably be quite reliable' Dacia, or £6k on a 2 year old Focus or <insert whatever car you'd like for £6k here>

Of course, if you want a Sandero because you want a new car and you don't really care much beyond that, then they are perfectly fine.

billzeebub

3,911 posts

228 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
If £200 is all you can afford up front currently, then second hand is definitely the way to go if you want any kind of longevity out of the machine. Worth checking if your employer is signed up to the Govt backed Cycle To Work scheme. You could then get anything up to £1000 voucher for bike/safety equipment. It comes out of your wage in 12 monthly instalments. Altogether it is significantly cheaper than the cost of purchasing outright and you should be able to up your budget to around the £500 mark without really noticing the monthly payment. Definitely worth looking into

okgo

42,141 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all

Steve vRS

5,395 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
This one is even closer to the OP's budget.

http://www.wheelies.co.uk/p52140/Dawes-XC-21-2013-...

Steve

Sarkmeister

1,700 posts

247 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Steve vRS said:
This one is even closer to the OP's budget.

http://www.wheelies.co.uk/p52140/Dawes-XC-21-2013-...

Steve
Even though it is over budget, the Specialized above will be a much better bike. The Dawes has a threaded headset for a start....

I'd be looking at a Carrera Subway (Halfords) or Pinnacle Lithium 1(Evan's Cycles). Both are fairly sturdy hybrids, suitable for both light trails and commuting to work.

As said above, if you really want a mountain bike worth having I'd see if you can up the budget by a couple of hundred.

blugnu

1,523 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Sarkmeister said:
Even though it is over budget, the Specialized above will be a much better bike. The Dawes has a threaded headset for a start.....
What's the problem with that? Most of the advantages of threadless headsets are to do with ease of manufacture. Either is a perfectly good mechanism though.

Sarkmeister

1,700 posts

247 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
blugnu said:
What's the problem with that? Most of the advantages of threadless headsets are to do with ease of manufacture. Either is a perfectly good mechanism though.
It makes upgrades (or replacement) of any of the surrounding components much more difficult.

Engineer1

10,486 posts

238 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
[quote=blugnuI'd hope that if someone comes on the photography forum asking which compact camera to buy for about £200 they don't get told that it'll be rubbish and they should get something 2.5x as expensive.
[quote]
Because a £200 bike unless you are lucky or know what you are looking at will turn out to be a massive unreliable liability that could kill your enjoyment. Cheap bikes can be heavy, poorly made and have rubish components which means they never ride properly and will proably be chucked in the shed unloved a good bike will last years.
there is a descriptive term of BSO - Bike Shaped Object that is a perfect discription of the low end bikes, the sad thing is some of these have brand names on that make you think back to the cool and desireable bikes of your youth.

Edited by Engineer1 on Wednesday 4th September 16:09

blugnu

1,523 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Engineer1 said:
blugnu said:
I'd hope that if someone comes on the photography forum asking which compact camera to buy for about £200 they don't get told that it'll be rubbish and they should get something 2.5x as expensive.
Because a £200 bike unless you are lucky or know what you are looking at will turn out to be a massive unreliable liability that could kill your enjoyment. Cheap bikes can be heavy, poorly made and have rubish components which means they never ride properly and will proably be chucked in the shed unloved a good bike will last years.
there is a descriptive term of BOS - Bike shaped Object that is a perfect discription of the low end bikes, the sad thing is some of these have brand names on that make you think back to the cool and desireable bikes of your youth.
(my bold) Maybe people could try and find out what to look for by asking other people who know more about it than them for advice. They should invent a way of people doing that smile

I think most of us have said that at a budget of £200 the OP would be best off looking for something second-hand.

blugnu

1,523 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Sarkmeister said:
blugnu said:
What's the problem with that? Most of the advantages of threadless headsets are to do with ease of manufacture. Either is a perfectly good mechanism though.
It makes upgrades (or replacement) of any of the surrounding components much more difficult.
Because people commuting 12 miles a day will be forever upgrading or replacing the handlebars and forks on a £200 bike?

Mr Will

13,719 posts

235 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Gizmoish said:
Not having a go at this OP in particular, but I wonder why it is that so many people taking up cycling think that £200 is a "reasonable" budget to start looking at? It can't be coincidence. Is it because it's double the price Tesco charge for an obvious POS?

I'd say that "decent" bikes (new) start at £500, which is also a decent starter SLR camera budget - but you don't get loads of people in the camera forum asking which SLR to buy for £200?
Get plenty of "Which bridge camera should I buy?" threads though...

Sarkmeister

1,700 posts

247 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
blugnu said:
Sarkmeister said:
blugnu said:
What's the problem with that? Most of the advantages of threadless headsets are to do with ease of manufacture. Either is a perfectly good mechanism though.
It makes upgrades (or replacement) of any of the surrounding components much more difficult.
Because people commuting 12 miles a day will be forever upgrading or replacing the handlebars and forks on a £200 bike?
I was using that as an example of what is essentially outdated standards on cheap bikes. There will be other areas that may have been a better example.

I'm standing by my opinion that the bike we are discussing is an awful choice for someone commuting 12 miles or so a day. You may feel differently.

Fotic

719 posts

158 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Gizmoish said:
Not having a go at this OP in particular, but I wonder why it is that so many people taking up cycling think that £200 is a "reasonable" budget to start looking at? It can't be coincidence. Is it because it's double the price Tesco charge for an obvious POS?

I'd say that "decent" bikes (new) start at £500, which is also a decent starter SLR camera budget - but you don't get loads of people in the camera forum asking which SLR to buy for £200?
I think suggesting a minimum of £500 for someone who wants to ride 6miles each way is being a touch dramatic!


Bobley

730 posts

178 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
That specialized hardrock is an aweful bike.

I paid £350 in the sale last year for the disc version (RRP £400) for my lad after he'd outgrown the Hotrock 24.

How disapointing. It weighs a LOT. The bars are 1 kilo alone and are thick wall steel. I was flabbergasted (wow there's a first) when I removed the forks. They felt like they were at least twice the weight of the Rockshox Rebas I replaced them with! I've replaced almost the entire bike now (crankset is also a joke) but the frame is still clearly heavy. I intend to buy him a Ragley Marley frame and reassemble the original bike and flog it soon.

If you want a starter bike MTB then get a used hardtail Boardman or a Hoodoo Voodoo but for a 12 mile commute you should buy my 1995 (RRP £615) Marin Redwoods hybrid for £60 and it'll go down the street at c. 80% of the difference between a MTB and a road bike and then you can muck about off road on it too.

Otherwise the Decathlon Triban 3 is the best starter road bike I reckon.

blugnu

1,523 posts

270 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Sarkmeister said:
blugnu said:
Sarkmeister said:
blugnu said:
What's the problem with that? Most of the advantages of threadless headsets are to do with ease of manufacture. Either is a perfectly good mechanism though.
It makes upgrades (or replacement) of any of the surrounding components much more difficult.
Because people commuting 12 miles a day will be forever upgrading or replacing the handlebars and forks on a £200 bike?
I was using that as an example of what is essentially outdated standards on cheap bikes. There will be other areas that may have been a better example.

I'm standing by my opinion that the bike we are discussing is an awful choice for someone commuting 12 miles or so a day. You may feel differently.
The OP wants to ride 12 miles a day - it's not exactly a round-the-world trip. My dad used to ride 15 miles a day on his steel framed road bike with a threaded headset, and did so for about 20 years on the same bike, which still has it's original headset and is now doing a sterling job of getting me to work and back - 10 speed down-tube friction shifters, threaded headset and single pivot brakes and all.

It may be an outdated standard, but it works perfectly well. The bike that was used to "win" the Tour de France a mere 14 years ago had a threaded headset.