Can some one explain these gears...
Can some one explain these gears...
Author
Discussion

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
Hi, I'm a bicycle idiot; can some one explain these gears please
it's a road bike with 700c wheels and the gears are 12-24 (compact) on the back and 42-53 on the rear.

does this mean my bike is set of for flat, hills or a combination? I ask because I live in the middle of the pennines and these hills are seeming bleeding impossible!

47p2

1,905 posts

191 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
12-24 (compact) on the back and 42-53 on the rear.

They are not a compact set of gears
12-24 will be on the wheel so high geared and not good for hills

42-53 again high geared and not good for hills


If you are looking for compact gears they should be around 34-50 front

Rear will range between 11 and 32 depending on the make

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
by compact I meant two ring. I guess I got my terms wrong!

ok, so it's rubbish gearing for hills. Given that I live next to the tour de france route I will need a different gearing.

would this be good on the back instead?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SHIMANO-11-32-8-SPEED-MO...

is it likely just to bolt straight on, or do I have to be careful to get the right type or something? will it work with my chain? should I stick to motorbikes?

Gizmoish

18,150 posts

239 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
"Compact" = usually 34/50, sometimes 36/50 at the front.
"Double" = 39/53, 42/52, various other options at the front.

I >think< that cassette will fit - Shimano 8-speed is all the same hubs iirc. And it will help.

Do you know how to change it though? You need special tools to get the freewheel off.

Some Gump

13,018 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
OP,

What gears do you have? The name will be on the rear deralleaur. The number of gears at the back is also important. If in doubt, take a photo and post it =)

Most road bikes can't do a 32 rear gear, not with a big ring up front. SRAM and Shimano both do a long cage version of the rear deraliur (for triples etc) that can, but most bikes are supplied with "short cage" rear mechs that will max out at 28 or so.

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Cool. Didn't know that. There is a good bike shop near me though who will change it over for me i think

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
OP,

What gears do you have? The name will be on the rear deralleaur. The number of gears at the back is also important. If in doubt, take a photo and post it =)

Most road bikes can't do a 32 rear gear, not with a big ring up front. SRAM and Shimano both do a long cage version of the rear deraliur (for triples etc) that can, but most bikes are supplied with "short cage" rear mechs that will max out at 28 or so.
its a shimano sora setup.

pic as requested smile


Some Gump

13,018 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all


wiggle said:
Top Features of the Shimano Sora 9 Speed Rear Derailleur

The 9 speed Sora derailleur features an advanced light action for low-friction shifting up or down the cassette and is compatible with all 9 speed frivetrains.

•Wide link design for increased rigidity and precise gear shifts•11-tooth pulleys for reduced pulley wear and chain noise•Pulleys feature sintered alloy bushings for smooth-running performance•37 tooth total capacity, rear sprocket size range 11-32T
I run a compact front (50-34), and 11-28 rear. I am bad at hills, but go in the peaks a lot. I still have to use my smallest combo sometimes, but get by. 34*28 is 31.9 inches.

If you can fit the 12-32, then your bottom gear is 42*32, which is 34.5".

That means your bottom gear is somewhere between my lowest and 2nd lowest combo. IMO you can get by on this, unless you intend to spend the whole time on the steepest hills you can find.

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
ok then, so a 11-32 or 12-32 on the back would be ideal.

by looking at the picture, can anyone tell if this will fit?

BGarside

1,568 posts

167 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
The comments above relate to the 9-speed version of the Sora rear mech. Yours looks like an 8-speed Mech. I'm not convinced it would be happy with a 32 tooth large sprocket.

You could fit an 11-32T or 12-32T cassette and, if the 32 tooth sprocket interferes with the rear mech., split the casette, remove the 32T sprocket and add a spacer, and use it as a 7-speed casette with a 28T largest sprocket (you'd need to reset the rear mech limit screw to avoid overshifting into the position formerly occupied by the 32T sprocket).

Alternatively, fit something like a 11-28 or 12-28 cassette and reduce the chainring sizes. You can fit a smallest inner 'ring of 38 teeth with the chainset you have, and then perhaps fit a 48 tooth or 50 tooth outer 'ring.

Alternatively, just swap the chainset to a 'compact double' with 'ring sizes 34 / 50.


Some Gump

13,018 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Bugger! I could have sworn that i counted 9 last night...

Anyways, this might help:

http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-4178...

Disco You

3,749 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
You're probably best off changing your chainring(s) rather than your cassette.

Rouleur

7,418 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Disco You said:
You're probably best off changing your chainring(s) rather than your cassette.
You can't put compact rings on the OP's chainset, he'd have to change the whole thing which will get expensive. It's the ideal solution though.

Disco You

3,749 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Rouleur said:
Disco You said:
You're probably best off changing your chainring(s) rather than your cassette.
You can't put compact rings on the OP's chainset, he'd have to change the whole thing which will get expensive. It's the ideal solution though.
Really? Are double dérailleurs not compatible with compacts?

Rouleur

7,418 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
It's the chainrings that are the problem, the spider arms on the different crank types are different lengths so you can't put compact rings on double cranks or vv.

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

196 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
ok, so i'm losing what you guys are saying slightly. so here is my understanding...

I assume I should be changing the front gears rather than the rear to make it easier, so...
.
I have taken off the big ring at the front which was dead easy to do, and it looks like the smaller ring could become the bigger ring, then I get an even smaller ring. BUT

measuring the distance between the bolt holes, it's 76.4mm which an ebay seller listed as BCD 130mm

Then I have a think about it. the 40 ring which is the small one i pretty much as small as you can get with this BCD. Meaning that if I wanted a smaller chainset, then I will need a whole new chainset and pedal thingies(crank?)... Which I assume isn't all that cheap.

A quick check of ebay confirms this.

So I'm back to the rear gear cassette (are my technical terms getting better?)

have had a look at the back, and there's no way I'm getting this off. says shimano dura-ace hyperglide Lock 40 nm
so this must be the tool to remove it: http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_sacat=0&_fro...

so after all that, here is my question:
If I buy this: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Shimano-CS-HG31-8-Speed-...
can I chop and change the different gear rings on it and on mine, or are they in a certain order, or are they fixed?


Edited by Efbe on Thursday 8th August 23:17

nike 5

169 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
I'm in a similar position - http://www.ukcyclingevents.co.uk/events/wiggle-men...

I'm on a 25+ year old alloy bike with 8 speed Campagnolo 12-23 cassette with 42+52 front chainring (double?).

Have not 'road' cycled for while, past couple of weeks have been refamiliarising with above old friend (which is very comfortable on flats and downhills).

LBS not keen to acquire/change cassette, and it looks like only option (for my rear cassette) is 13-26. So am going to just push on, missing that lower gear, and looking forward to top of hills and flats.
Will then make a decision on if I want to spend money on old bike or change. Or just stick to off road.
(have forgotten how much I had enjoyed the acceleration and speed though).

<> <> <>

EFBE - Below website calculator may help understand your ratios (and appreciate the overlap of gears whilst changing between front chainrings (yours is 42/53)

http://www.bikecalc.com/gear_ratios



Gizmoish

18,150 posts

239 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
nike 5 said:
LBS not keen to acquire/change cassette, and it looks like only option (for my rear cassette) is 13-26.
Sounds like your only option is to find a new LBS wink

yellowjack

18,461 posts

196 months

Friday 9th August 2013
quotequote all
It is possible to find 'Standard double' sized chainrings that will fit onto a 'Compact' crankset, with the smaller BCD. I know because I had a pack in my hand at Fatbirds in Norfolk, but I chickened out of buying them because they were quite expensive. I don't think it works the other way around, because the bolt holes on the larger 'Standard' crankset are too far out from the centre to allow a set of 'Compact' rings to fit. The front dérailleur will work with compact or standard rings, it just needs to be slid up/down the seat tube to 'mesh' correctly with the teeth of the chainrings that are fitted, and a corresponding change needs to be made to the clamping point on the cable.

On most rear cassettes, the smallest three/four 'cogs' (higher gears) are usually permanently joined together, with the remainder of the larger (low gear) 'cogs' coming separately in the pack. As such, it is possible to 'mix and match' the lower gears to achieve a 'custom' cassette on which you decide where the larger gaps between ratios should sit. This will most often mean buying more than one cassette and having some wasted 'spare' cogs. I have no idea if you can order separate component parts of rear cassettes from Shimano, but a decent LBS should be able to answer that question, or pass the query up to the distributor (Madison?).

Short answer (and cheapest option) is to take the advice of the LBS, or consult the Shimano data sheets you should find online, and fit the largest 'cog' your rear dérailleur can cope with, on an off-the-shelf cassette. If you buy a Shimano replacement, with the same numbers of cogs at the same spacings, you may not even need to adjust your indexing, simply purchase, fit, and forget. Most expensive option would be to buy a complete new 'compact' groupset and replace everything, or even just replace the whole bike with something more suited to the task. Personally, I'd recommend trying the cassette first. Either it works, and you love it, or when you come to sell the bike you can point to the 'brand new cassette, recently fitted - invoice to prove' on the ad wink

TwistingMyMelon

6,514 posts

235 months

Friday 9th August 2013
quotequote all
Yeah a decent LBS is your friend, even if they don't do all the work they can advise on what is needed , I do stress a "decent" LBS! They might even have a few bits to test with first so you don't order the wrong parts