53 39 chain set
Author
Discussion

SILICONEKID350HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Is a 53 39 a very high geared chain set ? I currently have a compact chain set ,is there a masive difference ? The rear cassette is 12 25.

Seen a bike i like which has this chain set . cheers

Edited by SILICONEKID350HP on Wednesday 20th February 22:05

Jimbo.

4,220 posts

218 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
It's a "standard" double. Your current compact is probably 34/50. Use any of the internet gear calculators to compare smile

Edited by Jimbo. on Wednesday 20th February 22:09

SILICONEKID350HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Jimbo. said:
It's a "standard" double. Your current compact is probably 34/50.
Being a novice i like my compact what ever that is ,there are loads of hills where i live ! thanks


Will the rear cassette be the same on both bikes .

Jimbo.

4,220 posts

218 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID350HP said:
Being a novice i like my compact what ever that is ,there are loads of hills where i live ! thanks


Will the rear cassette be the same on both bikes .
Impossible to say. *Generally* what cassette is fitted is largely independent of the chain set: it's down to rider/manufacturer preference.

If you like your compact, stick with it smile

LeftmostAardvark

1,744 posts

193 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
<old fart mode>

Thank god the general shift has been away from the 42/52 13-21 combo of my youth. I'm sure that was pretty much solely responsible for most of the knee problems of today. Hell, 39 25 sounds positively blissful. My time trial bike had a 48 17 bottom gear (57 12 top) and even my winter bike had 42 24.

</old fart mode>

I think, so long as you can keep a smooth cadence on the long hills you ride regularly, the you're ok. Take ego out of it, how many people honestly need a 53 11 or even a 53 12 top gear?

SILICONEKID350HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
My Jamis rear cassete is 11-26T . Just about to upgrade to a carbon.Noticed that the teeth numbers change on different size chain sets ,is this to accommodate for the larger turning circle ,if you know what i mean.

BadgerBenji

3,534 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
I'm happily riding on the road with my cyclo-cross gearing of 46-36 upfront and 11-26 at the back, perfect for when the road points up, and not that bad when it points down, would want a higher gear for road racing, but for training especially this time of year it's more than enough.

Toscana

12,241 posts

235 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
How many people can spin out a 50-11 on the flat?

SILICONEKID350HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Which is higher geared the 12 25 or 11-26 is that a 18 speed?

Jimbo.

4,220 posts

218 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID350HP said:
Which is higher geared the 12 25 or 11-26 is that a 18 speed?
12-25 has a lower final gear, higher first gear, and closer ratios in between as a result.
11-26 has a higher final gear, lower top gear, and more widely spaced ratios in between.

re. no. of speeds...who knows?! Could be anything!

Toscana

12,241 posts

235 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Depends if you have a compact or standard chain set!

MadDad

3,836 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
I guess it also depends on your appetite for speed! Spinning out on a 11t cassette regardless of chainring is going to see a rider hitting 40+ mph, so unless they are comfortable and confident at that speed then 11t v 12t becomes kind of academic.

I would suggest that a lot of of the standard vs compact comes down to the rider, and their style of riding. Personally both of my road bikes are fitted with standard cranks and 11-25 cassettes and have never found them crippling on climbs - although that said I live in the Thames Valley so only really ride the Chilterns, Surrey Hills and South Downs - so if you live in Yorks your local rides might be a tad more hilly. I would say that you would be fine with a standard, and if you find that you are struggling with hilly bits swap the cassette out for a 12-27, which would give you roughly the same spread as you have at the moment.

Oh, also - real men ride standards...... smile

SILICONEKID350HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for your help ,Would there be alot of difference in the lowest gear ?

Old bike 34/50. 11-26T

New bike 53 39 12 25

mudshark

94 posts

167 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
Go here and have some fun...

http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/

I use a compact chainset and occasionally spin out on my club run - 12-25 cassette. Thinking of trying a double with 12-27 in the summer, only problem is the number of 20% climbs I ride most weeks.

MadDad

3,836 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th February 2013
quotequote all
mudshark said:
Go here and have some fun...

http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/

I use a compact chainset and occasionally spin out on my club run - 12-25 cassette. Thinking of trying a double with 12-27 in the summer, only problem is the number of 20% climbs I ride most weeks.
Beat me to it, I was just googling for this article!!!

okgo

42,132 posts

227 months

Thursday 21st February 2013
quotequote all
50-11 is a bigger gear than 53-12

Pretty rare that you would need a bigger gear on a normal roadbike than 50-11 I reckon.

I could have done with a bigger gear than 53-11 on Sunday as felt like I was spinning out, but that is pretty rare.

Magic919

14,495 posts

230 months

Thursday 21st February 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID350HP said:
Thanks for your help ,Would there be alot of difference in the lowest gear ?

Old bike 34/50. 11-26T

New bike 53 39 12 25
Try your old bike with the nearest to 22 selected on the rear using the 34 front. That will be your 'new' crawler gear.

shouldbworking

4,801 posts

241 months

Thursday 21st February 2013
quotequote all
Personal preference of course, but having gone from 53/39 to a compact, I'd never go back. It's much more pleasant to be able to ride a steady cadence on savage hills than having to attack all the time.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

164 months

Thursday 21st February 2013
quotequote all
To the OP, I would say - buy the bike and don't worry too much. If the gearing doesn't work out for you it isn't an expensive exercise to change the rear cassette. It rather depends if you ride somewhere fairy flat, or hilly, and what level you're riding at. For most purposes you probably won't notice, and you can mostly set up either to give the range you want.

For that matter, it's quite possible (not guaranteed) that you can simply swap the chainsets between the bikes and have compact on the new one.. Would need to know details of both bikes to find that out.

Compact (50/34) is often paired with 11-25; that gives a pretty big range, but bigger gaps between gears. I personally found the gaps a bit big / annoying, but you can get rear cassettes that go as big as 27 or 28, and still work OK with a normal short cage rear mech (from memory I have a 27-12 on one wheel, and a 24-12 on my deep 'race' wheel)

Personally I've gone the other way from compact to std 53/39. My biggest complaint(s) with compact were the big gap in gearing between the front rings, and that I generally finished up spending a lot of time in an awkward (near) cross chained combos, which I avoid on a 53/39 setup. Much of that could be mitigated by going to 50/36 compact tho.

Edited by upsidedownmark on Thursday 21st February 13:14

thiscocks

3,398 posts

224 months

Thursday 21st February 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID350HP said:
Thanks for your help ,Would there be alot of difference in the lowest gear ?

Old bike 34/50. 11-26T

New bike 53 39 12 25
53 39 / 12-25 would be a decent set up.