Views on Blur LT vs Nomad vs Mojo HD.
Views on Blur LT vs Nomad vs Mojo HD.
Author
Discussion

v8 jago

Original Poster:

982 posts

282 months

Friday 20th April 2012
quotequote all
Im starting to look at different options for a new bike. To save costs im probs gonna buy a frame and use the parts of my ransom to build it back up. I feel the Scott ransom isnt so quick and responsive as some bikes on the trails but its ok for steady DH. I know it depends on how the bike is set up and what parts it using etc but im wanting a change so looking for some feedback of anyone thats had a bike im looking at or deals in them and knows them 100% rather than just trying to get a sale. It will be used for X/C and for trail centers like 7 staines etc so needs to be robust enough. Im 6ft and 16 stone so no feather weight build either. I would like another carbon bike but it might be just out of my price range so might have to be the alloy. Any pointers from the description ive gave would be great.;)

joshleb

1,550 posts

173 months

Friday 20th April 2012
quotequote all

Out of those, difficult between the nomad and the mojo. The blur is a great bike, but I've always wanted a nomad over one.

Other possible options are the Commencal Meta am, which I think look amazing!
Orange 5, even though every man and there dog have them because they are THAT good!

Most frames nowadays at that level are all going to perform pretty well, especially as it is mainly the shock that is used to sort out any flaws with the suspension linkage and compression curve.

GSP

1,965 posts

233 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
Nomad or Mojo HD... I hated the blur, seemed much more xc orientated, even on relatively mild descents I felt I was going over the bars, wasn't comfortable at all.

The nomad and mojo are both epic, still love my five though.