Super Six Boxing

Author
Discussion

dirty boy

Original Poster:

14,738 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th October 2009
quotequote all
Anyone else looking forward to this?

http://sports.sho.com/world-boxing-classic.html

Great line up, nice to see two champs putting their belts on the line too.


tuscaneer

7,843 posts

231 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
kessler surely is the man here but it will get interesting when we see what abraham can bring up from middle.i like froch but i can`t see his wildness beating a measured kessler.i don`t think taylor can do much here and i don`t know enough about the other 2 lads to comment with conviction.obviously good pedigree though.boxing needs more of this

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

222 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
I always feel as though Taylor is wasted talent. He should never of lost to Pavlik the first time around as he should of pressed the fight when he put Pavlik on the canvas and had him hurt and the same goes for the Froch fight. For the first 6 rounds he was in complete control but he has severe stamina issues. Anyone who pressures him or throws alot of punches will always cause him trouble as far as I'm concerned.

If I had to put money on someone to win I would bet on Kessler without a shadow of a doubt.

StevenJJ

541 posts

215 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Yet again anyone without Murdoch TV has been shafted. I am ready to pay to watch a legit stream but there isn't one! Will be battling it out with the wasters on the unofficial streams frown

I want Froch to win this tournament - I truly believe if he does he will have elevated himself above Calzaghe. The only person who is not here is Bute but he's kind of been left behind and made himself irrelevant by not being involved even if he can mix it with these guys. Regarding Froch I know it looks a tall order but most of the pundits in his previous couple of fights have swayed to the side of 'well I think this could be the night he doesn't quite match up' and then he wins again.

Dirrell looks the better boxer on paper - younger, faster etc. and I think he will wow the judges in rounds 1-3 with his zip. Froch will then drag him down into the trenches by his ankles and bludgeon him in his usual fashion. The problem is the 'take 2 to give 1' approach is going to fail at some point; let's hope it's far beyond this tournament when that happens.

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

222 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
[quote=StevenJJ]
I want Froch to win this tournament - I truly believe if he does he will have elevated himself above Calzaghe. The only person who is not here is Bute but he's kind of been left behind and made himself irrelevant by not being involved even if he can mix it with these guys. Regarding Froch I know it looks a tall order but most of the pundits in his previous couple of fights have swayed to the side of 'well I think this could be the night he doesn't quite match up' and then he wins again.

I don't doubt that this would boost his stock if he wins but I don't think he's anywhere near the level of Calzaghe at the moment and if they had ever of though I reckon Calzaghe would of gave him a boxing lesson.

I'd like to see Froch do fairly well but I just don't see him getting past the likes of Kessler.

tuscaneer

7,843 posts

231 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
watching froch reminds me of those guys from the 50`s like graziano and zale and la motta.superb to watch but ultimately the guile of a calzaghe or a prime jones wins those sorts of affairs.while this dirrel kid is largely untested his amateur creds are definately eyebrow raising.unbeaten as a pro....remember when everyone said froch was untested?every boxer is untested at some point in their career.hope froch comes through it and my gut feel is a kessler/froch or kessler/abraham final

hornetrider

63,161 posts

211 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
So, Froch v Dirrell this weekend and once again the poor bloke can't get a slot on ITV or Sky. Is there a more exciting British boxer around at the moment? I don't think so, his last fights against Taylor and Pascal were simply sensational.

I haven't seen anything of Dirrell though - thoughts on how this will go?

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

222 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
Who knows! Dirrell is a young and up-coming fighter who likes to switch his stance from Southpaw to Orthodox very quickly and effectively when he goes on the attack. Something to think about though, Froch's fight with Taylor proves that he can be outboxed by a slick fighter but Froch will keep walking forwards whilst throwing punches with conviction.

It's not a fight I'd like to call as I don't really know enough about either of them. Froch has the potential to knock Dirrell out and Dirrell has the potential to outbox Froch.

I'd also watch the Abraham vs Taylor fight this weekend too. Abraham is a warrior with good power and a solid chin and Taylor is a slick boxer with great skill who is often let down by his stamina issues. The only saving grace in this fight for Taylor is that Abraham isn't a volume puncher and Taylor has apparently been working on his stamina. Doesn't mean he'll show up any different to his last few outings though!

The great thing about the Super Six tournament is that they have got a fantastic selection of fighters so it's almost impossible to call each fight.

My money is still on Kessler to win the competition though as he's fought the better competition and aside from the Calzaghe fight, he's hardly lost a round to anyone which is pretty impressive when you consider his opposition.

tuscaneer

7,843 posts

231 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
agreed this is exciting because all the matchups are competitive.given frochs problems with taylor and dirrells stylistic similarities i see dirrell taking an early lead but froch digging his heels in and getting a narrow win

im

34,302 posts

223 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
^^^

Yeah - agree with all of that. If asked, the other 5 would all like to avoid Kessler but fancy their chances against the rest.

Devilstreak

8,088 posts

187 months

Saturday 17th October 2009
quotequote all
Slightly off topic I know. But nottingham city centre is already covered in police.. Must be expecting a lively day. What with forests biggest game of the year and then Froch..

ETA that the fight is on tele.. Sky channel 480. A few pubs in nottignham will be showing it.

Edited by Devilstreak on Saturday 17th October 08:15

130R

6,849 posts

212 months

Saturday 17th October 2009
quotequote all
Dirrell hasn't fought at even close to this level before and for that reason I predict Froch is going to stop him. I don't think Froch is particularly good but he does have excellent stamina, an iron chin and decent power. Dirrell will try to outbox him and win by UD.

For the winner of the whole thing I'm going for Jermain Taylor, he's the best boxer in it plus I think he will have learnt his lesson from the last Froch fight and won't fade so badly again.

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

222 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
Well I reckon Froch was lucky to walk away with the win. He didn't land cleanly all night and was trying to rough house Dirrell all night long but Dirrell got deducted a point for holding? Having said that, Dirrell didn't engage too well either but he did start landing abit cleaner in the 10,11 and 12th rounds.

It's a fight that could be scored either way and I wouldn't have complained if Dirrell had got the nod instead.

Abraham was very calm and methodical against Taylor who boxed well early on but heading into the 12th, I had Abraham well up on the cards. Abraham finished the show with a huge straight right that had taylor out cold before he hit the canvas.

Abraham is looking good in this competition!

Now for some sleep..

towser

988 posts

217 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
Lucky Froch - could have gone either way. Not sure if the judges were swayed by the home crowd and Froch's desire to at least be the aggressor. Dirrel was on his bike and spoiling for 9 out of the 12 rounds and only really opened up for the last 3 - even then it was only in bursts. Can't really recall anything of note from Froch for the whole 12 rounds. Bit of an anti-climax to be honest after some very entertaining Froch fights over the last couple of years ( and the hype around this ).

Dirrel very slick and fast but really needs to be more on the front foot and aggressive if he's going to do anything in this series. When he did engage he looked dangerous.

Froch will hopefully be better against a come forward opponent.

Abraham looked solid defensively and powerful coming forward - a real tank of a fighter......

130R

6,849 posts

212 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
130R said:
For the winner of the whole thing I'm going for Jermain Taylor, he's the best boxer in it plus I think he will have learnt his lesson from the last Froch fight and won't fade so badly again.
And sure enough I am completely wrong and exactly the same thing happens again hehe

Abraham does look good though

StevenJJ

541 posts

215 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
Havn't seen Froch yet apart from a few sketchy YouTube vids... is the consensus that the decision was fair?

tuscaneer

7,843 posts

231 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
i wouldn`t say froch was lucky.close fight but you don`t nick world titles.i can see the similarities with the jones comparison apart from one thing.rjj used to be an offensive master,throwing loads of well placed spiteful shots.dirrell didn`t.i got the feeling he doesn`t trust his own chin.i kept hearing the wil o the wisp comments but again,go and watch some footage of wil o the wisp himself willie pep.elusive to the point of frustration but always scoring points.you cannot win a world title on the back foot all night.the mention of herol graham made me smile.i remember talking to chris eubank a few years ago and cheekily asking him why he never fought the bomber.his response-"why didn`t i fight herol graham?let me tell you about that man,you could take a handful of rice and throw it at him and he wouldn`t get hit by a single grain.that is why i never fought herol graham" refreshingly honest and very funny.

arthur abraham doesn`t look too spectacular but is ruthlessly efficient.starting to make the pre tournament odds of 7-1 against to win look a bit too long.

towser

988 posts

217 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
tuscaneer said:
"why didn`t i fight herol graham?let me tell you about that man,you could take a handful of rice and throw it at him and he wouldn`t get hit by a single grain.that is why i never fought herol graham"
Brilliant....

im

34,302 posts

223 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
I see the yanks were screaming 'hometown decision' - although the referee was Panamanian & 1 judge was Mexican with the other 2 judges being latin european rolleyes

Still, if anyone knows how to do a 'hometowner' its the sceptics.

The 1st Holyfield v Lewis fight dances before my eyes...

Edited by im on Monday 19th October 09:18

Vette_1978

3,247 posts

228 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
im said:
The 1st Holyfield v Lewis fight dances before my eyes...
A classic draw! The female American judge claims she couldn't see what was happening so gave the fight to Holyfield, and then Brit Larry gives the final round to Holyfield which draws the fight.

I remember being sat dumbfounded at the back of the Garden for what seemed like hours!