poms vs convicts

Author
Discussion

HSVGTSCoupe

Original Poster:

2,535 posts

236 months

Saturday 15th November 2008
quotequote all
how frustrating is that? we dish you up a decent serve at rugby HQ today, dominte the pack, on fire with the kicking. Don't get me wrong, luvin the sweet victory but it begs the question....


WHY THE fk CANT WE DO THE SAME IN THE FRIGGIN RWC WHERE YOU TURN US INTO JELLY REGARDLESS OF FORM???

and FFS don't give me that stock answer "JW" cos that's bks, as good a player as he is, he really had nout to do with the last win in France.

:HUMPH:

bandit

Edited by HSVGTSCoupe on Saturday 15th November 22:59

Chrispy Porker

17,123 posts

234 months

Sunday 16th November 2008
quotequote all
Perhaps you get refs who referee the scrums at RWC ?
Seriously though I guess it matters more at RWC.

spikeyhead

17,848 posts

203 months

Sunday 16th November 2008
quotequote all
There's always the possibility of us not gifting you three quarters of your points when it actually matters.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

261 months

Sunday 16th November 2008
quotequote all
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!

suthol

2,223 posts

240 months

Sunday 16th November 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
Interesting choice of words from the vanquished rolleyes

playerone

872 posts

216 months

Sunday 16th November 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
There's nothing more satisfying than watching the pompous, braying hosts get beaten. Then start dragging out words like "rebuilding" and various other excuses.

Was the same in the rugby league. The commentators were actually talking about the Aus vs England final before the game against NZ! Comical.



Chrispy Porker

17,123 posts

234 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
playerone said:
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
There's nothing more satisfying than watching the pompous, braying hosts get beaten. Then start dragging out words like "rebuilding" and various other excuses.

Was the same in the rugby league. The commentators were actually talking about the Aus vs England final before the game against NZ! Comical.
You mean the 'pompous braying hosts' of 2003 RWC surely?

ewenm

28,506 posts

251 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
playerone said:
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
There's nothing more satisfying than watching the pompous, braying hosts get beaten. Then start dragging out words like "rebuilding" and various other excuses.

Was the same in the rugby league. The commentators were actually talking about the Aus vs England final before the game against NZ! Comical.
You sound happier that England lost than Australia won confused Must be a true "fan" rolleyes

Congrats to Australia; they played better, took their chances and kicked more successfully. England have a lot more work to do.

playerone

872 posts

216 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
ewenm said:
playerone said:
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
There's nothing more satisfying than watching the pompous, braying hosts get beaten. Then start dragging out words like "rebuilding" and various other excuses.

Was the same in the rugby league. The commentators were actually talking about the Aus vs England final before the game against NZ! Comical.
You sound happier that England lost than Australia won confused Must be a true "fan" rolleyes

Congrats to Australia; they played better, took their chances and kicked more successfully. England have a lot more work to do.
Im not a fan of either. Im from NZ smile Its just boring that there are certain commentators who are obsessed with the way NZ, Aus and SA rugby teams (and fans) conduct themselves. Read Stephen Jones blog in the Times and every second article is about NZ.

The fact that they call us arrogant is so massively hypocritical. Teams who win consistently have to believe that they will win. If that comes accross as arrogant then thats a problem for the opposition's mental preparation than the team in question.

You guys beat yourself before you play because you have in built excuses about rebuilding, new coaches, new combinations etc etc. If a new player comes into the AB's or Aussie teams they are expected to perform and there is a structure there that will support them to do it. Very few players from either of those teams are in and out of the team like players like Hodgson, Lewsey or Tait. Look what happened when Woodward had a team centred around Wilkinson, Dallaglio and Johnson.


Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

261 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
suthol said:
Blue Meanie said:
It's a "lulling into a false sense of security" type scenario. Nothing more hilarious than seeing the bragging, and gloating antipodeans getting beaten!
Interesting choice of words from the vanquished rolleyes
I see you've missed the point completely... Well done.