Olympics - what went right?

Olympics - what went right?

Author
Discussion

x5x3

Original Poster:

2,424 posts

259 months

Saturday 23rd August 2008
quotequote all
we have done well this time - especially in the so called "posh" sports

so what was different this time?

more money, better facilities, better coaches?

will there be an inquest?

why did it not happen with the track and field?

KANEIT

2,680 posts

225 months

Saturday 23rd August 2008
quotequote all
Legs weren't long enough!

x5x3

Original Poster:

2,424 posts

259 months

Saturday 23rd August 2008
quotequote all
forgot how literal everyone is on here, track and field was an example, nothing more and nothing less.

If you want a list of sports we did not do well at then google.

I was trying to focus on the positive, i.e. the sports we did well at, and asking the question what has changed from last time?

FourWheelDrift

89,447 posts

290 months

Saturday 23rd August 2008
quotequote all
I think the difference is everyone gets exposed to track and field sports at school, but there are very few schools that teach rowing, cycling and yachting. So anyone who takes up those sports is doing so because they really want to and not because they are forced into it because they happen to be better than the other kids at the school which on the global scale of things isn't that good.

And I think there has been more money pumped into track and field athletics in the UK than any other sport in the Olympics.

simba1

547 posts

206 months

Sunday 24th August 2008
quotequote all
I think we will struggle to match the medals tally in 2012. Other rich countries will up their budget in the 'posh olympics' where we excelled.

ewenm

28,506 posts

251 months

Tuesday 26th August 2008
quotequote all
Looking at our "top 3" sports that definitely went right and comparing to athletics, from the Beijing 2008 website:
Track Cycling - 188 entrants
Sailing - 400 entrants
Rowing - 550 entrants
Athletics - 2000 entrants

Is it any surprise that athletics medals are particularly hard to come by?

Fantastic work by the cyclists, rowers and sailors. Don't make the mistake of assuming that the athletes aren't working as hard as the other sportspeople just because they aren't winning the medals.

Scooby_snax

1,279 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th August 2008
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Looking at our "top 3" sports that definitely went right and comparing to athletics, from the Beijing 2008 website:
Track Cycling - 188 entrants
Sailing - 400 entrants
Rowing - 550 entrants
Athletics - 2000 entrants

Is it any surprise that athletics medals are particularly hard to come by?

Fantastic work by the cyclists, rowers and sailors. Don't make the mistake of assuming that the athletes aren't working as hard as the other sportspeople just because they aren't winning the medals.
Statistics statistics, you only paint half a picture. How many different events/discilpines did the athletics have? in the sailing there were 11 disciplines and 47 in athletics so the ratios are 1:36 sailing 1:42 athletics perhaps not as great a difference as you were suggesting!

ewenm

28,506 posts

251 months

Wednesday 27th August 2008
quotequote all
Scooby_snax said:
ewenm said:
Looking at our "top 3" sports that definitely went right and comparing to athletics, from the Beijing 2008 website:
Track Cycling - 188 entrants
Sailing - 400 entrants
Rowing - 550 entrants
Athletics - 2000 entrants

Is it any surprise that athletics medals are particularly hard to come by?

Fantastic work by the cyclists, rowers and sailors. Don't make the mistake of assuming that the athletes aren't working as hard as the other sportspeople just because they aren't winning the medals.
Statistics statistics, you only paint half a picture. How many different events/discilpines did the athletics have? in the sailing there were 11 disciplines and 47 in athletics so the ratios are 1:36 sailing 1:42 athletics perhaps not as great a difference as you were suggesting!
Yep and we got 4 athletics medals and 6 sailing ones so pretty comparable, and yet the sailing squad are (rightly) lauded as successful and the track and field squad are not. As you've shown the ratios of people to events are similar so why are the reactions to similar success so different?

Scooby_snax

1,279 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th August 2008
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Scooby_snax said:
ewenm said:
Looking at our "top 3" sports that definitely went right and comparing to athletics, from the Beijing 2008 website:
Track Cycling - 188 entrants
Sailing - 400 entrants
Rowing - 550 entrants
Athletics - 2000 entrants

Is it any surprise that athletics medals are particularly hard to come by?

Fantastic work by the cyclists, rowers and sailors. Don't make the mistake of assuming that the athletes aren't working as hard as the other sportspeople just because they aren't winning the medals.
Statistics statistics, you only paint half a picture. How many different events/discilpines did the athletics have? in the sailing there were 11 disciplines and 47 in athletics so the ratios are 1:36 sailing 1:42 athletics perhaps not as great a difference as you were suggesting!
Yep and we got 4 athletics medals and 6 sailing ones so pretty comparable, and yet the sailing squad are (rightly) lauded as successful and the track and field squad are not. As you've shown the ratios of people to events are similar so why are the reactions to similar success so different?
Maybe it is because 4 of the 6 sailing ones were Gold and Ben Ainslie won his 3rd Gold